https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoni Boucher :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5940b4e59f8e198dbf7e8b733561ef72a9ba2cbc
commit r13-1036-g5940b4e59f8e198dbf7e8b733561ef72a9ba2cbc
Author: Antoni Boucher
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105912
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
The ICE started with r277733
commit f968ef9b8df2bc2287e5e7e87299e5a2a44e8c94
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sat Nov 2 00:28:20 2019 +0100
PR c++/88335 - Implement P1073R3: Immediate functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105912
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105912
--- Comment #1 from Luke Dalessandro ---
Somewhat reduced testcase:
template struct A {};
template struct B {};
template
static consteval auto operator~(A) -> B {
return {};
}
A<'i'> i;
template
au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105912
Bug ID: 105912
Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_call_expr, at
cp/call.cc:7114
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100613
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100613
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1f99a4b0563e53a6ea5d03b44d5a4c27699c50b
commit r10-10820-ge1f99a4b0563e53a6ea5d03b44d5a4c27699c50b
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-09
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53288
Egor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamsupermouse at mail dot ru
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105911
Bug ID: 105911
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791
(error: unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105910
--- Comment #2 from Karine EM ---
It is probably the case: gcc-10 just compiles the program (as it is a UB) which
crashes with "Abort" when trying to actually run this program; llvm returns an
error:
test4.c:4:13: error: argument value 524288 i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105910
Bug ID: 105910
Summary: ICE: with -O1 optimization level and code calling
__builtin_return_address
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105866
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105871
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c334e0e4ff05d3a7ca9ebb832428c446cd0ae8d
commit r13-1027-g4c334e0e4ff05d3a7ca9ebb832428c446cd0ae8d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90254
m.cencora at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.cencora at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105909
Bug ID: 105909
Summary: RFE: SARIF output could contain metadata about
limitations of the analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105894
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> The analyzer's region model might make this fairly easy to implement.
Specifically: the result of the function call would be a conjured_svalue where
the stmt of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105397
Mathias Stearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84920
--- Comment #10 from Lewis Hyatt ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> That looks pretty good to me. What does it produce for the operator<<
> example in comment 1?
With the default options:
=
iowarn2.cpp: In function ‘
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105856
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102529
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105908
Bug ID: 105908
Summary: out-of-class definition of templated method with
decltype in trailing return type fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60913
dr.i.j.bush at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr.i.j.bush at googlem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105856
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #6)
> Hi David. Thanks again for all your help (building Linux distributions is a
> helpful/vital service to the GCC community).
Thanks. Good to know I am doing som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
After inlning I see:
IPA function summary for rcu_tasks_trace_pertask/5350 inlinable
global time: 13.535950
self size: 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84920
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That looks pretty good to me. What does it produce for the operator<< example
in comment 1?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105856
--- Comment #6 from Roger Sayle ---
Hi David. Thanks again for all your help (building Linux distributions is a
helpful/vital service to the GCC community). Can you confirm that this problem
is now fixed on ARM?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105853
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105866
--- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle ---
Hi Joseph. Sorry again for the breakage. Hopefully, the
load_register_parameters ICE is now resolved. Can you confirm that glibc now
builds without problems on MIPS?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105874
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105907
Bug ID: 105907
Summary: unordered containers should cache result of
std::hash
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105886
--- Comment #7 from Keven ---
Thank you for your fast investigation :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keven.kloeckner at siemens dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105886
--- Comment #5 from Keven ---
Created attachment 53112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53112&action=edit
source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105886
--- Comment #4 from Keven ---
Created attachment 53111
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53111&action=edit
Disassembly screen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105886
--- Comment #3 from Keven ---
Created attachment 53110
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53110&action=edit
precompiled file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105877
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> "strip -g" removed .gnu.debuglto_.debug_info sections. Should LTO remove the
> references of stripped debug info? Or should "strip -g" keep LTO debug info?
I suppose we should try to immi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105906
Bug ID: 105906
Summary: fanalyzer strdup false positive leak in loop
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Try it again without using a directory called "_Source/_12,1,x"
Say _Source/_12.1.x would work, dot is often used separator in filenames that
is known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And wouldn't surprise e if spaces wouldn't cause various issues as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if we should document what characters in the directories could cause
issues. I know @ also causes issues when the documentation is being generated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105818
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
The different flag bit is OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT.
if ((rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT) == 0
&& flag_shrink_wrap_separate
&& optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Try it again without using a directory called "_Source/_12,1,x"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105880
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101260
--- Comment #18 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus ---
Fixed for 12 and mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #5 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
Thank you for your reply.
So, what have I to do ?
Please note that GCC v. 11.3.0 was successfully built and installed with the
same configuration (./configure).
Kind regards,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105905
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105905
Bug ID: 105905
Summary: A possible rounding error
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105818
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From what I can see, it is mostly integral implementation and we already have
one such in GCC, so the question is if we just shouldn't use it (most of the
sources
are in libgcc/soft-fp/ , then configurati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
@Michael: Now that gcc 12 is out of the door, I would suggest we try to get
your code into the gcc tree for gcc 13.
It should follow the gcc style guidelines, which is quite trivial to do:
Comments should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105874
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
Can confirm that the benchmark works again.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105904
Bug ID: 105904
Summary: Predicated mov r0, #1 with opposite conditions could
be hoisted, between 1 and 1< // using the libstdc++ header
unsigned roundup(unsigned x){
return std::bit_ceil(x);
}
http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103320
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105493
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:269edf4e5e6ab489730038f7e3495550623179fe
commit r13-1021-g269edf4e5e6ab489730038f7e3495550623179fe
Author: Cui,Lili
Date: Wed Jun
62 matches
Mail list logo
