https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103320
Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I also met this issue recently, not sure if roms_r's failure has the same root
cause with what we have for perlbench_r, perlbench_r's page [1] highlights the
option "-fno-unsafe-math-optimizations " while roms_r's [2] doesn't. One thing
to note is that without -funroll-loops roms_r's verification can pass. Maybe
it's a good idea to reopen this for more investigation?
[1] https://www.spec.org/cpu2017/Docs/benchmarks/500.perlbench_r.html
[2] https://www.spec.org/cpu2017/Docs/benchmarks/554.roms_r.html
