https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #44
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105830
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105830
Bug ID: 105830
Summary: call to memcpy when -nostdlib -nodefaultlibs flags
provided
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105795
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.1, 12.1.1
Status|ASSIG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105795
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:340c53bc6352d223f543faac71996a3fa87d9119
commit r11-10046-g340c53bc6352d223f543faac71996a3fa87d9119
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Please check this. Second pair of eyes needed.
$ ./a.out
i= 1 input="2,5," with point x =2.05.0 OK
i= 1 input="2,5," with comma x = 666.0 999.0 ERR
i= 2 input="2;5," with point x =2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829
--- Comment #1 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 53075
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53075&action=edit
First patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829
Bug ID: 105829
Summary: Allow getting the size of floating-point types
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105828
Bug ID: 105828
Summary: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wshadow
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105827
--- Comment #1 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 53074
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53074&action=edit
First patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105827
Bug ID: 105827
Summary: Infinite recursion in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #47 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #46)
> Even partially making the build less recursive would likely help a fair bit.
It will help a bit, sure, but not nearly as much as you perhaps hope for.
There
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105814
Bruce Fleming changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105795
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a4b608b31af3824d615cd490f855e3730d217b4
commit r12-8455-g7a4b608b31af3824d615cd490f855e3730d217b4
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98822
--- Comment #3 from David Friberg ---
I believe the current wording doesn't cover what should happen when
instantiating a constrained non-template (hidden) friend, particularly
instantiation of constrained (hidden) friends whose requires-clauses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105826
Bug ID: 105826
Summary: failure to compile namespace-scope constexpr
new-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b98910406b5000a6429c188b0c6cc14e3140637
commit r13-968-g7b98910406b5000a6429c188b0c6cc14e3140637
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102529
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
Hmm, it looks like this issue isn't concepts specific. Any non-trivial alias
template, i.e. one that isn't just a renaming of the underlying template (in
the sense of cwg1286) exhibits this bug. We still r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105795
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d19b4342c19e5a7fd84888aa06ebc106438d0c46
commit r13-963-gd19b4342c19e5a7fd84888aa06ebc106438d0c46
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105795
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db4243bb681f7d4e82c15674eb3bfd9b82b0cf71
commit r13-962-gdb4243bb681f7d4e82c15674eb3bfd9b82b0cf71
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-960-20220602111723-g72c605eea94-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220602 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105110
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davveston at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99699
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98822
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10566
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37e4e7f77d8f7b7e911bf611a0f8edbc3a850c7a
commit r13-961-g37e4e7f77d8f7b7e911bf611a0f8edbc3a850c7a
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105791
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37e4e7f77d8f7b7e911bf611a0f8edbc3a850c7a
commit r13-961-g37e4e7f77d8f7b7e911bf611a0f8edbc3a850c7a
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44425
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105824
Bug ID: 105824
Summary: Accepts invalid issue with implicit conversion of a
scoped enumeration type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103810
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> Note also that there is a proposal for C23 (N2854) to allow such
> functions, including changing the requirements on va_start to make it
> possible t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103812
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103459
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
I've been working a bit on this in my autotools-tinkering branch in my
userspace; it's nowhere near done yet, though... I'm also mirroring the branch
on GitHub: https://github.com/cooljeanius/gcc/tree/me/aut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-02
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103525
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[RISCV] wrong function |wrong function entry with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102168
Peter Dimov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pdimov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105792
--- Comment #4 from Petr Sumbera ---
I can confirm that gcc (GCC) 12.1.1 20220528 doesn't have this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101803
--- Comment #8 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
OK, thank you anyway!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105823
Bug ID: 105823
Summary: -Wrestrict / -Wstringop-overflow / -Warray-bounds
warnings for uninitialized values
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||csaba_22 at yahoo dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101803
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #6)
> Since it seems like 10.4 is around the corner... any chance this will make
> it?
>
> Thanks a lot!
Unfortunately I don't think so :/ the patch doesn't appl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
Lets see try to remember
it can be ambiguous. The inversion of undefined is not necessarily expected
to be varying in all circumstances.. Likewise, inverting varying is still
varying in some circum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105821
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105822
Bug ID: 105822
Summary: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.cc:2579
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105821
Bug ID: 105821
Summary: ICE for illegal constexpr-if
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
Bug ID: 105820
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in invert, at value-range.cc:1971
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105437
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|11.3.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105437
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:462e7e2c6fe0bc57e03110d43a2c7e53a1ce04ea
commit r11-10045-g462e7e2c6fe0bc57e03110d43a2c7e53a1ce04ea
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Honza, any estimate how long this could take? I'd prefer to wait with 10.4 for
it if it isn't going to take too long.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.1.1 |12.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, -Wl, etc. options don't have an escape mechanism, they just split the
argument on any , seen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105786
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f1e32c69d3f0cc04665587c18937a773616c6bd
commit r12-8453-g9f1e32c69d3f0cc04665587c18937a773616c6bd
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105726
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9bc27ee76d510360637c9578ffdefeab5c336e86
commit r12-8452-g9bc27ee76d510360637c9578ffdefeab5c336e86
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdd93e5b88e6aab832509d7aabed6cfd2d014c58
commit r12-8451-gcdd93e5b88e6aab832509d7aabed6cfd2d014c58
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:740771a620f661800b99dfc039b8896e2ddb9265
commit r12-8450-g740771a620f661800b99dfc039b8896e2ddb9265
Author: Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72c605eea94065606b5ddcb5a51ef24a3d2841e9
commit r13-960-g72c605eea94065606b5ddcb5a51ef24a3d2841e9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105752
--- Comment #5 from Csaba Ráduly ---
The fact that GCC 11 shows an error for the code in comment #4 suggests that
this was a bug which was fixed. Does it ring a bell to anyone? This bug should
probably marked as a duplicate, but of which other b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #2 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
Created attachment 53072
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53072&action=edit
my-make.log (xz compressed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
--- Comment #1 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
Created attachment 53071
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53071&action=edit
my-configure.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105819
Bug ID: 105819
Summary: GCC 12.1.0 Make failed - Compiled with GCC 4.9.4 and
under Mac OS X lion - I
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105818
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Sorry, there's a newline missing after the first paragraph, so the testcase
looks like this:
#pragma GCC optimize "-fno-tree-vectorize"
void
foo (void)
{
void
bar (void);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105818
Bug ID: 105818
Summary: ICE: 'global_options' are modified in local context
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcfdd2851b297e0005a8490b7f867ca45d1ad340
commit r13-927-gdcfdd2851b297e0005a8490b7f867ca45d1ad340
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105817
Bug ID: 105817
Summary: outline kernel-address sanitizer doesn't save
callee-saved register properly on AArch64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-02
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105816
Bug ID: 105816
Summary: SLP vectorize permutes from different groups
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105815
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-02
Keywords|
75 matches
Mail list logo
