https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105752
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Csaba Ráduly from comment #5) > The fact that GCC 11 shows an error for the code in comment #4 suggests that > this was a bug which was fixed. Does it ring a bell to anyone? This bug > should probably marked as a duplicate, but of which other bug? Looks like we started to correctly reject the comment #4 testcase after r11-6800-g29853c653245c3. Since the testcase is pretty similar to the one from PR58993, I guess we can mark this a dup of that PR. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58993 ***