https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105815
Bug ID: 105815
Summary: [x86] Extend ix86_vectorize_vec_perm_const which now
accept different input and output modes by r13-745
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105799
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
((v * A) + B) * C is handled in distribute_and_simplify_rtx.
-cut from combine.c---
6090case MULT:
6091 /* If we have (mult (plus A B) C), apply the distributive law and
then
6092
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 101668, which changed state.
Bug 101668 Summary: BB vectorizer doesn't handle lowpart of existing vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101668
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101668
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101668
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08afab6f8642f58f702010ec196dce3b00955627
commit r13-926-g08afab6f8642f58f702010ec196dce3b00955627
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.2|---
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105802
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a6b8d9aad9f68eec223cc126d9effbf45e37271
commit r13-925-g4a6b8d9aad9f68eec223cc126d9effbf45e37271
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105814
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105814
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|operand has impossible |16 "=rm" use in inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105814
Bug ID: 105814
Summary: operand has impossible constraints - worked with
previous releases
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813
Bug ID: 105813
Summary: ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at
fortran/simplify.cc:8490
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> Similar error observed for x86 on ICX.
> With option `-march=icx -Ofast -flto` for 510.parest_r.
-march=icelake-server
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
Similar error observed for x86 on ICX.
With option `-march=icx -Ofast -flto` for 510.parest_r.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #12 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 53068
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53068&action=edit
tested patch
Once the optimization node of the caller has changed, we need to rebuild the
target node in the cont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9)
> inline_call will force reload global optimization.
>
> /* Reload global optimization flags. */
> if (reload_optimization_node && DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (to->decl) =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812
--- Comment #1 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 53067
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53067&action=edit
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812
Bug ID: 105812
Summary: type mismatch in binary expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105811
Bug ID: 105811
Summary: Diagnostics for template class member call with
missing template parameters can be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105782
--- Comment #2 from Koakuma ---
Created attachment 53066
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53066&action=edit
Vectorization log from -fopt-info-vec-all
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You can check -fopt-info-ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105734
--- Comment #14 from Jeremy R. ---
Thank you for the quick patch :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105798
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27576
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d546ff69455f7deadab65309de89d19380a8864
commit r13-923-g2d546ff69455f7deadab65309de89d19380a8864
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Jan 17 16:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
template void hh() { ss t; }
template
int f(void)
{
constexpr char const* cc = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
struct j{ char const* kk=cc; };
hh();
}
int t = f<1>();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105810
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
You can see this generates extremely good assembly even under -Os
https://godbolt.org/z/oaerzYeo6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105810
Bug ID: 105810
Summary: __glibcxx_assert can be improved greatly.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95648
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95648
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4c3cd5ca5fe13724253d4270dc643fbc6b7f557
commit r13-922-gc4c3cd5ca5fe13724253d4270dc643fbc6b7f557
Author: David Seifert
Date: Wed Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53065
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53065&action=edit
testcase from the URL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105638
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a743a72714fc4a9d7036d28d0cacdf2a3621f629
commit r13-921-ga743a72714fc4a9d7036d28d0cacdf2a3621f629
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed May 18 13:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
Bug ID: 105809
Summary: GCC ICE when deal with __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ inside
macro
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105808
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Removing the include:
using size_t = decltype(sizeof(0));
template
struct extent
{
static constexpr size_t value = 0;
};
template
struct extent
{
static constexpr size_t value = size;
};
static_as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
namespace std {
template class shared_ptr;
}
struct S {};
template void build_matrices() {
std::shared_ptr(new S);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105808
Bug ID: 105808
Summary: Internal unsafe integer narrowing conversion during
non-type template argument value deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105734
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105779
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105734
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b090938e61260ce841a0d51de3407881a38e3c52
commit r12-8447-gb090938e61260ce841a0d51de3407881a38e3c52
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105779
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:819e3fda1e0fc4cc07f5fd9211cdb38cdec1b901
commit r12-8446-g819e3fda1e0fc4cc07f5fd9211cdb38cdec1b901
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Weird. Can you show your gcc -v output so that I can configure gcc the same?
(Yes, checking is enabled in my build.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105795
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104787
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamil.sliwak at codepoets dot
it
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105794
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105806
--- Comment #2 from Joseph ---
When getting symbols using readelf for get_meta() in some .o files symbol is
FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT and in others FUNC WEAK HIDDEN (we use hidden visibility
option).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105734
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2e471d83d16449a325315c0f33dc52b90ce0fac
commit r13-920-ge2e471d83d16449a325315c0f33dc52b90ce0fac
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105779
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72e52b88582e738c8b8bde5f85af63d3a0e15d2b
commit r13-919-g72e52b88582e738c8b8bde5f85af63d3a0e15d2b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And it was that revision, too.
seurer@muskie:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ whichgcc
Now at commit 1ad584d538d349db13cfa8440222d91d5e9aff3f, r13-859-g1ad584d538d349
seurer@muskie:~/gcc/cpu2017/benc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes it is:
seurer@muskie:~/gcc/cpu2017/benchspec/CPU/510.parest_r/build/build_peak_none.0002$
whichgcc
Now at commit ff91735a5b861dd6eaf2c1e511f26a9255898e7d, r13-860-gff91735a5b861d
seurer@mus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105807
Bug ID: 105807
Summary: ICE / error when defining a class containing
polymorphic components
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105806
Vincent changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent.lextrait at gmail dot
com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105806
Bug ID: 105806
Summary: [concepts] template class specialization using concept
issue
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I still cannot reproduce with
GNU C++17 (GCC) version 13.0.0 20220530 (experimental)
(powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu)
Can you please double check that the Comment 2 test is the correct one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
--- Comment #21 from Chengnian Sun ---
Thank you, Andrew and Jakub.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With a bit of hacking with a chainsaw I got it to this:
#include
#include
class SparsityPattern
{
public:
};
template
class BlockSparsityPatternBase// : public Subscriptor
{
};
class Blo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #19)
> (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #18)
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > While testing gcc with -fcompare-debug, I was asked a question which puzzled
> > me as w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105805
Bug ID: 105805
Summary: -fstrict-volatile-bitfields can read beyond the end of
the bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #18)
> Hello folks,
>
> While testing gcc with -fcompare-debug, I was asked a question which puzzled
> me as well.
>
> What if we always enable -g, and use 'strip'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf78d8411d00e21c30512d2af895e70d38bbfb77
commit r13-917-gcf78d8411d00e21c30512d2af895e70d38bbfb77
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #17 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
Thanks a lot for fixing this quickly!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105804
Bug ID: 105804
Summary: List-initialized argument in await expression is
doubly freed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
--- Comment #18 from Chengnian Sun ---
Hello folks,
While testing gcc with -fcompare-debug, I was asked a question which puzzled me
as well.
What if we always enable -g, and use 'strip' to remove debug information from
the binary file? Then w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Would there be a chance to get a reduced testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
Bug ID: 105803
Summary: [13 regression] ICE at gcc/cp/pt.cc:27737 after
r13-860-gff91735a5b861d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105802
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
The reason for the precision check is because doing a union or intersection
with ranges of different precisions is problematic, and being sure what the
user expects would be a guess
normally in this sort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|12.1.1 |
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105802
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-01
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105697
--- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua ---
I think the volatile keyword in function parameters is critical to this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105786
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57a8fb92ac4161ebbf9381b009e8c5af843e3e5f
commit r13-913-g57a8fb92ac4161ebbf9381b009e8c5af843e3e5f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105797
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47819
Bug 47819 depends on bug 93865, which changed state.
Bug 93865 Summary: .debug_line with LTO refers to bogus file-names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93865
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105491
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] Usage |[10/11 Regression] Usage of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105491
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e30b73bad9486f11b6b0022ae4a3edfc0f9da4bb
commit r12-8445-ge30b73bad9486f11b6b0022ae4a3edfc0f9da4bb
Author: Patrick Palka
nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220601 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105770
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d5cc976a36af07c9790c38a99a0b98110c89795
commit r13-912-g0d5cc976a36af07c9790c38a99a0b98110c89795
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105785
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
probably missing TYPE_CONTEXT here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105782
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
You can check -fopt-info-vec for vectorization. Note the sparc backend doesn't
implement any of GCCs vectorizer cost modeling hooks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105781
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is cost modeling which is what the existing -funroll-[all-]loops RTL
unrolling lacks. The vectorizer meanwhile can unroll vectorized loops by means
of increasing the vectorization factor which th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11) |11.3.1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105801
Bug ID: 105801
Summary: Missed CCP with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227
Bug 59227 depends on bug 59230, which changed state.
Bug 59230 Summary: __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0 missing from libgcc_s.so.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59230
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59230
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105800
Bug ID: 105800
Summary: Segfault deallocating a class, dimension(:) array
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105786
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105786
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |ICE in
|compute_distrib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 31 May 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
>
> --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
> Looks like codesize decreased after
> r13-7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105763
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae575e93b6f7fb7077940cb7410f899da184ec2d
commit r13-873-gae575e93b6f7fb7077940cb7410f899da184ec2d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
98 matches
Mail list logo
