https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 31 May 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643 > > --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> --- > Looks like codesize decreased after > r13-754-ga1c9f779f75283427316b5c670c1e01ff8ce9ced. > > Now we have cost model for unswitching loop > > decorate.c:605:25: note: not unswitching condition, cost too big (37 insns > copied to 35 and 37) Yes, I noticed that when comparing opt-info before/after on SPEC as well. Note the actual cost limit wasn't adjusted in any way, there's still some planned improvements pending and adjusting the cost limit is one of that.
