[Bug driver/103465] [12 regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition broken on 64-bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Severity|normal

[Bug target/95737] PPC: Unnecessary extsw after negative less than

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95737 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/80857] slow compare_exchange_weak with unintegral type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug middle-end/92455] Unnecessary memory read in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92455 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/78874] Manual describes "-Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations" as if without "no-"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78874 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- @item -Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations @opindex Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations @opindex Waggressive-loop-optimizations Warn if in a loop with constant number of iterations the compiler detects undefined

[Bug middle-end/78874] Manual describes "-Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations" as if without "no-"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78874 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/103926] "wQ" broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103926 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Alexey Kardashevskiy from comment #3) > Documented here: > https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2015-08-31/rst-experiment/how-to-use- > inline-assembly-language-in-c-code.html Not documented i

[Bug c++/82125] Suboptimal error message for range-based for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82125 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/54299] Array parameter does not allow for iterator syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/54299] Array parameter does not allow for iterator syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-06 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/103926] "wQ" broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103926 --- Comment #3 from Alexey Kardashevskiy --- Documented here: https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2015-08-31/rst-experiment/how-to-use-inline-assembly-language-in-c-code.html Your example does not compile either (but does not crash :) ) This

[Bug middle-end/51867] GCC generates inconsistent code for same sources calling builtin calls, like sqrtf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/46106] Error in Manpage? -fstack-protection => -fstack-protector(-all)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46106 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/45272] comment about sqrt() implementation wrong: it is not from Carmack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/39552] Unnecessary stack usage with flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39552 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug target/103925] Missing int3 in ix86_output_indirect_function_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103925 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The bug is in ix86_output_indirect_function_return.

[Bug target/103925] Missing int3 in ix86_output_indirect_function_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103925 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In repl

[Bug target/103925] Missing int3 in ix86_output_indirect_function_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103925 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot gnu

[Bug target/103926] "wQ" broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103926 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/103926] "wQ" broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103926 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Host|power8 | Build|3b0ba97fafe8 (2 wee

[Bug other/103926] New: "wQ" broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103926 Bug ID: 103926 Summary: "wQ" broken Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassign

[Bug c++/102191] [C++20] Can't return prvalue with potentially-throwing destructor during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102191 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug target/103925] New: Missing int3 in ix86_output_indirect_function_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103925 Bug ID: 103925 Summary: Missing int3 in ix86_output_indirect_function_return Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/103879] error: accessing value of variant::_Copy_ctor_base through a 'const variant' glvalue in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103879 --- Comment #10 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #9) > That one unfortunately seems to be an unrelated constexpr bug. Mind opening > a separate PR? > > I'm reducing the testcase.. Reported PR103924.

[Bug libstdc++/103924] New: views::join combined with std::string cannot be used in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103924 Bug ID: 103924 Summary: views::join combined with std::string cannot be used in constant expressions Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/103622] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in altivec_resolve_new_overloaded_builtin)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103622 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/102708] Improve ''array temporary was created for argument" diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102708 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/103366] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc, at fortran/trans-expr.c:5647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103366 --- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- The proposed patch looks reasonable to me.

[Bug c++/103758] bogus warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103758 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1935db296892bbd9fc597889237528bd7e080ab1 commit r12-6277-g1935db296892bbd9fc597889237528bd7e080ab1 Author: Marek Polacek Date: W

[Bug bootstrap/59447] --with-dwarf2 should be documented as meaning "DWARF 2 or later" instead of just "DWARF 2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59447 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/59447] --with-dwarf2 should be documented as meaning "DWARF 2 or later" instead of just "DWARF 2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59447 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-09-07 00:00:00 |2022-1-5 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pins

[Bug preprocessor/45227] libcpp Makefile does not enable instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45227 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|WAITING

[Bug ipa/67051] symtab_node::equal_address_to too conservative?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67051 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/10520] induction variable analysis not used to eliminate comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10520 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, shouldn't we convert: _24 = MAX_EXPR ; if (_24 < _tmp0_27(D)) goto ; [94.50%] else goto ; [5.50%] [local count: 906139990]: _25 = MAX_EXPR ; if (_25 < _tmp0_27(D)) goto ; [94.50

[Bug tree-optimization/10520] induction variable analysis not used to eliminate comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10520 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Here is the current IR at optimized: [local count: 958878296]: # n_in_42 = PHI # n_out_43 = PHI # n_in1_44 = PHI # n_out1_45 = PHI n_in.0_1 = (int) n_in_42; _3 = n_in.0_1 w* 4; _4 = buf_f

[Bug target/43311] missed 'movw' optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43311 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Host|x86_64-gnu-linux| Build|x86_64-gnu-linux

[Bug libstdc++/103923] is_invocable inexplicably fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/103923] New: is_invocable inexplicably fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923 Bug ID: 103923 Summary: is_invocable inexplicably fails Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/103711] Virtual base destroyed twice when an exception is thrown in a derived class' constructor called from a delegated constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103711 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/103622] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in altivec_resolve_new_overloaded_builtin)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103622 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ec62dbafe0cb3b79cc635dfb964ef6a7ccc2d40 commit r12-6275-g4ec62dbafe0cb3b79cc635dfb964ef6a7ccc2d40 Author: Bill Schmidt Date:

[Bug c++/103922] fconcepts syntax cause g++ to stop checking access modifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103922 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/103922] fconcepts syntax cause g++ to stop checking access modifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103922 --- Comment #1 from Ido Kessler --- (In reply to Ido Kessler from comment #0) > As far as I could verify this has not been mention anywhere. > > Versions: g++-9 (all versions I tried). Was fixed in g++-10. > Compiler flags: -fconcepts -std=c++1

[Bug c++/103922] New: fconcepts syntax cause g++ to stop checking access modifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103922 Bug ID: 103922 Summary: fconcepts syntax cause g++ to stop checking access modifiers Product: gcc Version: 9.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/103910] openjdk17 causes ICE on -O3 -march=opteron -fcheck-new: during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch: in gimple_build_call, at gimple.c:267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103910 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/103910] openjdk17 causes ICE on -O3 -march=opteron -fcheck-new: during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch: in gimple_build_call, at gimple.c:267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103910 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d243f4009d8071b734df16cd70f4c5d09a373769 commit r12-6274-gd243f4009d8071b734df16cd70f4c5d09a373769 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: We

[Bug fortran/95879] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_formal_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/103861] [i386] vectorize v2qi vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103861 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c166632bd22d7da66354121502019fc9c92ef07f commit r12-6273-gc166632bd22d7da66354121502019fc9c92ef07f Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Wed J

[Bug libstdc++/103453] ASAN detection with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/103877] libstdc++ docs give a bad recommendation for printing C++ defines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103877 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|10.4

[Bug libstdc++/102445] [meta-bug] std::regex issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102445 Bug 102445 depends on bug 103549, which changed state. Bug 103549 Summary: Uninitialized member warning from regex header https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103549 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/103549] Uninitialized member warning from regex header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103549 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|12.0

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:226210894e53259940a8e1453125e37c65299ba4 commit r11-9441-g226210894e53259940a8e1453125e37c65299ba4 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/103919] The basic_string(const T&, size_type, size_type) constructor is overconstrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103919 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d566335a31722f8044852d9a24f492830ae5789 commit r10-10381-g0d566335a31722f8044852d9a24f492830ae5789 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103877] libstdc++ docs give a bad recommendation for printing C++ defines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103877 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39e5b756e1412a399613d7df25d8730e7de1d989 commit r11-9439-g39e5b756e1412a399613d7df25d8730e7de1d989 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/103877] libstdc++ docs give a bad recommendation for printing C++ defines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103877 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88518e5ae0c7b4ed87ffa4ba39c1ff93c7d146dd commit r10-10380-g88518e5ae0c7b4ed87ffa4ba39c1ff93c7d146dd Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103501] associative containers left invalid after allocator-extended move construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103501 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bae757f80970824fbc6a1a2598b233ff489efa4a commit r11-9438-gbae757f80970824fbc6a1a2598b233ff489efa4a Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/103549] Uninitialized member warning from regex header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103549 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17af7c1a054c9663e5b353a4fc576522e0cd9a4f commit r10-10379-g17af7c1a054c9663e5b353a4fc576522e0cd9a4f Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103549] Uninitialized member warning from regex header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103549 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e0ef5621b518caa593b77b7c8f202ee018a0900 commit r11-9437-g5e0ef5621b518caa593b77b7c8f202ee018a0900 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/103453] ASAN detection with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37fec1c1b0c942d861dd51b31d099084826a485b commit r10-10378-g37fec1c1b0c942d861dd51b31d099084826a485b Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/103453] ASAN detection with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad54d3fb8f09babc43ea46a93cc73cd623fe822f commit r11-9436-gad54d3fb8f09babc43ea46a93cc73cd623fe822f Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103919] The basic_string(const T&, size_type, size_type) constructor is overconstrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103919 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c64143f32642d22590959704e2ec6c686d745ff commit r11-9435-g4c64143f32642d22590959704e2ec6c686d745ff Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug analyzer/103546] Analyzer reports null dereference in flex scanners

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103546 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-05 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/93050] throw within constructor initialisation list causes invalid free in destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93050 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/103782] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal error occurs when overloading intrinsic since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug tree-optimization/103899] [12 Regression] make profiledbootstrap fails due to uninitialized warning in expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103899 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > While we should fix uninit warning to deal with this if possible, I think we > should also try to work around this in expr.c. > > If following works, then I thi

[Bug target/103910] openjdk17 causes ICE on -O3 -march=opteron -fcheck-new: during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch: in gimple_build_call, at gimple.c:267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103910 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96057] [9/10/11/12 Regression] -Wreturn-type warning message disappears with -O1+ in anonymous namespace definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96057 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-Wreturn-type warning |[9/10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug target/103722] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn building glibc for SH4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103722 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/90769] Template instantiation recursion when trying to do a conversion template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90769 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/103920] No warning for large structs passed by value ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103920 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually I think the warning is incorrect as there are aliasing implications if passed by reference instead of by value.

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- There are some further questions though. E.g. address_compare has a smart code to assume that static vars will never be adjacent to automatic vars or vice versa (the implementation guarantees that): /* Ass

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, for #c5, if (&a[1] == &b[0]) instead of if (a+1 == b+0) works right, that is handled by the match.pd (cmp (convert1?@2 addr@0) (convert2? addr@1)) address_compare simplification. And it also works f

[Bug rtl-optimization/94440] [9 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r7-5324-gb8cab8a5492e9639

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440 --- Comment #21 from Uroš Bizjak --- Fixed?

[Bug target/103915] [12 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in memory_operand with -flive-range-shrinkage since r12-6215-g708b87dcb6e48cb4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103915 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [9/10/11/12 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 Bug 92860 depends on bug 103905, which changed state. Bug 103905 Summary: [12 Regression] Miscompiled i386-expand.c with -march=bdver1 and -O3 since r12-1789-g836328b2c99f5b8d https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103905 What

[Bug target/103905] [12 Regression] Miscompiled i386-expand.c with -march=bdver1 and -O3 since r12-1789-g836328b2c99f5b8d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103905 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/103915] [12 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in memory_operand with -flive-range-shrinkage since r12-6215-g708b87dcb6e48cb4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103915 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6aa44066b342b9636a736f28d7ac3a0d44dae5c8 commit r12-6270-g6aa44066b342b9636a736f28d7ac3a0d44dae5c8 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Wed J

[Bug target/103905] [12 Regression] Miscompiled i386-expand.c with -march=bdver1 and -O3 since r12-1789-g836328b2c99f5b8d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103905 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:877c9e332f9b2b6eacd6ed4edf5790ee0f41a68f commit r12-6269-g877c9e332f9b2b6eacd6ed4edf5790ee0f41a68f Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Wed

[Bug c++/103879] error: accessing value of variant::_Copy_ctor_base through a 'const variant' glvalue in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103879 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka --- That one unfortunately seems to be an unrelated constexpr bug. Mind opening a separate PR? I'm reducing the testcase..

[Bug c++/103921] [modules] ICE dependent expression in explicit-specifier of instantiation of imported template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921 --- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- For the above, when it's fixed: ```diff - explicit(B) operator int() const; + explicit(B) operator int() { return 0; } ```

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues in gcc that other static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer, PVS-studio) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 94669, which changed state. Bug 94669 Summary: libcc1: 4 * minor performance problem https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/94669] libcc1: 4 * minor performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/103921] [modules] ICE dependent expression in explicit-specifier of instantiation of imported template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921 --- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Simplified: https://godbolt.org/z/rnfKrzYaP. mod.cpp: ```C++ export module mod; export template struct Int { explicit(B) operator int() const; }; ``` test.cpp: ```C++ import mod; int main(

[Bug c/94669] libcc1: 4 * minor performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 --- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #7) > Could this bug be marked as fixed, then ? Yes, but I don't really know the GCC rules about closing reports any more, so someone else probably ought to handle it.

[Bug target/103197] ppc inline expansion of memcpy/memmove should not use lxsibzx/stxsibx for a single byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103197 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npiggin at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/102169] powerpc64 int memory operations using FP instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102169 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/103914] -fcheck=do seems not to work with omp parallel do construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103914 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Stat

[Bug c++/103921] [modules] ICE dependent expression in explicit-specifier of instantiation of imported template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[modules] ICE requires in |[modules] ICE dependent

[Bug target/103197] ppc inline expansion of memcpy/memmove should not use lxsibzx/stxsibx for a single byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103197 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 52131 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52131&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug libstdc++/103086] [11 Regression] std::unique_ptr printer gets confused by [[no_unique_address]] in tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103086 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also fixed for 10.4 now.

[Bug inline-asm/98096] Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug libstdc++/103086] [11 Regression] std::unique_ptr printer gets confused by [[no_unique_address]] in tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103086 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:865ad53c49953f2950901aaf45b34a38841df019 commit r10-10375-g865ad53c49953f2950901aaf45b34a38841df019 Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/103086] [11 Regression] std::unique_ptr printer gets confused by [[no_unique_address]] in tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103086 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5400112aa94163b1e94404e74b3000779d24303b commit r10-10374-g5400112aa94163b1e94404e74b3000779d24303b Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug inline-asm/98096] Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 James Y Knight changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foom at fuhm dot net --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug fortran/95879] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_formal_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/103920] No warning for large structs passed by value ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103920 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Blocks|

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > At least when not constant evaluating that, a + 2 can be equal to b + 0 or > can be different, shouldn't we reject at least that? I think so, according to https:

[Bug fortran/103258] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114 since r12-4979-gee11be7f2d788e60

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103258 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

  1   2   >