[Bug libstdc++/103877] libstdc++ docs give a bad recommendation for printing C++ defines

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103877

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<r...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88518e5ae0c7b4ed87ffa4ba39c1ff93c7d146dd

commit r10-10380-g88518e5ae0c7b4ed87ffa4ba39c1ff93c7d146dd
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 4 15:54:16 2022 +0000

    libstdc++: Fix example preprocessor command in FAQ [PR103877]

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/103877
            * doc/xml/faq.xml: Add '-x c++' to preprocessor command.
            * doc/html/faq.html: Regenerate.

    (cherry picked from commit cebe875f6f44b905a0d56a2007b5a638a33a893c)