[Bug target/35363] Missing bit field coalescing optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35363 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 85283, which changed state. Bug 85283 Summary: Generates 20 lines of assembly while only one assembly instruction is enough. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85283 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/85283] Generates 20 lines of assembly while only one assembly instruction is enough.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/47769] [missed optimization] use of btr (bit test and reset)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2011-02-1

[Bug rtl-optimization/98962] Perform bitops on floats directly with SSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98962 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||the4naves at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/101311] GCC refuses to use SSE registers to carry out an explicit XOR on a float.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101311 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/64897] Floating-point "and" not optimized on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/93039] Fails to use SSE bitwise ops for float-as-int manipulations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93039 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/64897] Floating-point "and" not optimized on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Since GCC 9 we get for fand1: movq%xmm0, %rax btrq$63, %rax movq%rax, %xmm0 ret The question comes does the movement between sse registers and gprs is cheaper than

[Bug libffi/64618] Missing GCC changes in libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64618 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libffi/64620] Missing changes from libffi upstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64620 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug target/46219] Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|R

[Bug tree-optimization/24026] cleanup_control_expr_graph uses fold to fold COND_EXPR_COND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24026 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug driver/48691] Assembler file clobbered with -save-temps (LTO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48691 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this was fixed in GCC 11.

[Bug tree-optimization/47255] Missed CSE optimization with inline functions, and __attribute__((const))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2011-01-1

[Bug target/34064] ARM: missed optimization (conditional store)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34064 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The trunk we get: movsr3, #0 .L2: cmp r0, r1 bcc .L3 @ sp needed bx lr .L3: stmia r0!, {r3} b .L2

[Bug target/44132] [4.6 Regression] emutls is broken under a range of circumstances.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44132 --- Comment #44 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 44450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/44450] gcc.dg/lto/20090210 fails with emutls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44450 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/38856] loop iv detection failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38856 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug tree-optimization/26939] loop number of iterations analysis not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26939 --- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski --- In GCC 4.7 (and above), we get: Analyzing # of iterations of loop 2 exit condition [1, + , 1](no_overflow) <= i1_6(D) bounds on difference of bases: -1 ... 2147483646 result: under assumptions i1_

[Bug c/42136] Inconsistent strict-aliasing warning with cast from char[]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42136 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.2 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/32073] Loop unrolling does not exploit VRP for loop bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note there is a few things here that can be improved even more. With a slightly different testcase: void short_loop(int* __restrict dest, int* __restrict src, int count) { // same happens for assert(count <

[Bug target/31238] Too many instructions as not reversing loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31238 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 Status|NEW

[Bug target/11997] libgcc build fails because crtbeginS.o not built for sh-netbsdelf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/19089] Environment variable TMP may yield gcc: abort with internal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19089 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug other/19089] Environment variable TMP may yield gcc: abort with internal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19089 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Something like after the access check has passed: #ifdef S_ISDIR struct stat s; if (stat(dir, &s) <0) return NULL; if (!S_ISDIR (s.st_mode)) return NULL; #endif

[Bug other/19089] Environment variable TMP may yield gcc: abort with internal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19089 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/103306] [12 Regression] parallel build hangs since r12-5234-g04c5a9 when /usr/include includes broken symbolic links

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/62157] make distclean error when libsanitizer is configured not to build 'tsan'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug c++/94484] ICE in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94484 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-04-04 00:00:00 |2021-11-27 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/84653] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (prep_operand)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84653 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #2 from Andr

[Bug c/101057] [gimplefe] GIMPLE frontend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057 Bug 101057 depends on bug 101035, which changed state. Bug 101035 Summary: ICE: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1751 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101035 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/101035] ICE: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101035 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98042] error diagnostic for unmatched parentheses could be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98042 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-28 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/101035] ICE: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101035 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from And

[Bug middle-end/29231] need a way to produce trampolines not on the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29231 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/62157] make distclean error when libsanitizer is configured not to build 'tsan'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- From: https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/SUBDIRS-vs-DIST_005fSUBDIRS.html If SUBDIRS contains AC_SUBST variables, DIST_SUBDIRS will not be defined correctly because Automake does not know

[Bug sanitizer/62157] make distclean error when libsanitizer is configured not to build 'tsan'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/3415] make distclean (in gcc subdirectory) does not clean up all the way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3415 Bug 3415 depends on bug 100987, which changed state. Bug 100987 Summary: make distclean error "hwasan: No such file or directory" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100987 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug sanitizer/62157] make distclean error when libsanitizer is configured not to build 'tsan'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antony at cosmologist dot info --- Comme

[Bug sanitizer/100987] make distclean error "hwasan: No such file or directory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100987 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/103453] ASAN detection with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/100987] make distclean error "hwasan: No such file or directory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100987 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98071] no_unique_address and reusing tail padding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98071 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97285] Interaction between no_unique_address and has_unique_object_representations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97285 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- clang has fixed this on the their trunk. That is std::has_unique_object_representations_v is true there.

[Bug fortran/103263] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103263 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/102043] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51839|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/103453] New: ASAN detection with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 Bug ID: 103453 Summary: ASAN detection with clang Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ As

[Bug middle-end/103431] [12 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts since r12-4853-g2a83259f837e5cbd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103431 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 103435, which changed state. Bug 103435 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:879:13: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug tree-optimization/103435] [12 Regression] gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:879:13: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103435 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/103431] [12 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts since r12-4853-g2a83259f837e5cbd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103431 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7e4f57f1c7883721b6f5ad48953e10ebfb5a756 commit r12-5558-gf7e4f57f1c7883721b6f5ad48953e10ebfb5a756 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug tree-optimization/103435] [12 Regression] gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:879:13: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103435 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:567d5f3d62fba2a23a9e975f7e7c7b61bb67cf24 commit r12-5557-g567d5f3d62fba2a23a9e975f7e7c7b61bb67cf24 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug libstdc++/103448] unexpected tuple collapse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103448 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- With class template argument deduction, T(T{}) will always make a copy of the same type, and not wrap it in a different specialization of the template. There is no bug here, as Andrew said.

[Bug ipa/103451] [12 Regression] crash at gcc/range-op.cc:1836 since r12-5531-g1b0acc4b800b589a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |ipa Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/103449] [12 Regression] use-after-free in ipa_param_body_adjustments::prepare_debug_expressions(tree_node*) (ipa-param-manipulation.c:1283) since r12-4920-g1ece90ffa9ce63b4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103449 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-27 Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/103450] [12 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in memory_operand (recog.c:1818) with -Og -fharden-compares -fschedule-insns2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre since r12-5536-g90cb088ece8d8cc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103450 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug bootstrap/103452] *** Configuration arm-unknown-mingw32ce not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103452 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101853] [12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/77721] -Wformat-truncation not uses arg range for converted vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Sounds like gcc-8.0.1 PASS for me r257061 FAIL r258034 PASS r12-5546 PASS $ ~/arch-gcc/SVN/gcc_258034/bin/gcc --version gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180227 (experimental) [trunk revision 258034] $ ~/arch-gcc/SV

[Bug bootstrap/103452] *** Configuration arm-unknown-mingw32ce not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103452 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Nobody has contributed support for it. Do you want to be the first?

[Bug bootstrap/103452] *** Configuration arm-unknown-mingw32ce not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103452 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51890 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51890&action=edit stdout logs

[Bug bootstrap/103452] *** Configuration arm-unknown-mingw32ce not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103452 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51889 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51889&action=edit err

[Bug bootstrap/103452] New: *** Configuration arm-unknown-mingw32ce not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103452 Bug ID: 103452 Summary: *** Configuration arm-unknown-mingw32ce not supported Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c/103451] New: crash at gcc/range-op.cc:1836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451 Bug ID: 103451 Summary: crash at gcc/range-op.cc:1836 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug rtl-optimization/103450] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in memory_operand (recog.c:1818) with -Og -fharden-compares -fschedule-insns2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre

linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12--20211127001619-gf4ed2e3ae7d-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms:

[Bug ipa/103449] New: [12 Regression] use-after-free in ipa_param_body_adjustments::prepare_debug_expressions(tree_node*) (ipa-param-manipulation.c:1283)

ecking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20211127 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug libstdc++/103445] build failure for old versions of mingw32 (not mingw-w64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103445 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Sorry, I don't understand anything above. I don't care whether you're using > mingw or mingw-w64, what I asked is how old it is. Libstdc++ expects a > recent versio