https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24026
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=67915
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fold is never used there since r0-88576; we use gimple_fold but gimple_fold at
the time called fold, with the fix for PR 67915, we moved over to
gimplify_simplify instead.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67915#c1 also which describes
this exact issue.
We have now:
if (gimple_simplify (stmt, &res_op, NULL, no_follow_ssa_edges,
no_follow_ssa_edges)
&& res_op.code == INTEGER_CST)
val = res_op.ops[0];
And a different order too:
/* Do cleanup_control_flow_bb in PRE order. */
static bool
cleanup_control_flow_pre ()
So I am going to say this is fixed.
