https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Bo Duan from comment #6)
> Hello, should we backport this patch to gcc-10?
It's scheduled for a backport to GCC 11, I'm not aware that GCC 10 is affected?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102991
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regress]|[12 regression]
|gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
The problem is not related to XCode 13.1 which appeared at roughly the same
time. On Big Sur with XCode 13.1 still all works as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102987
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9,10,11,trunk] Segfault|[9/10/11/12 Regression]
In file included from :1:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20211028/include/c++/12.0.0/atomic:651:5:
note: in call to 'void
std::atomic<_Tp*>::wait(std::atomic<_Tp*>::__pointer_type, std::memory_order)
[with _Tp = char; std::atomic<_Tp*>::__pointer_type = char*]'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102868
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102868
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:146b83e14a0a76a9ce8a4cb79997a078f437f779
commit r12-4781-g146b83e14a0a76a9ce8a4cb79997a078f437f779
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
--- Comment #6 from Bo Duan ---
Hello, should we backport this patch to gcc-10?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046
--- Comment #13 from Bo Duan ---
(In reply to Bo Duan from comment #11)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046
--- Comment #12 from Bo Duan ---
(In reply to Bo Duan from comment #10)
> Created attachment 51697 [details]
> 0001-Subject-PATCH-ipa-102714-IPA-SRA-eliding-volatile.patch
I'm so sorry, I seem to have sent it in the wrong place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046
--- Comment #11 from Bo Duan ---
Hi, should we backport this patch to gcc-10? If needed, an adapted patch is
attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046
Bo Duan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||duan.db at linux dot
alibaba.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84bcefdaf6d95e08cd980965098961289215
commit r12-4780-g84bcefdaf6d95e08cd980965098961289215
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |MOVED
--- Comment #44 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102993
Luke Dashjr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |9.3.0
--- Comment #2 from Luke Dashjr --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102993
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you provide the full output of gcc -v? Also can you test out GCC 9.4.x or
above since GCC 7 is no longer supported?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102993
Bug ID: 102993
Summary: -mcf-protection=full produces segfaulting code when
targeting 32-bit x86 (i686)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> confirmed - I have no idea how to categorise this issue at present.
>
> Does gfortran do something special opening/cloning stdin/out/err?
Libfortran does a few t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-28
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Using a C program compiled with the same version (recent trunk with the fix by
Iain Sandoe for Monterey) leads to a program that can pipe to a file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102955
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
Bug ID: 102992
Summary: Piping in a file does no longer work on macOS Monterey
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Cooper ---
One curious thing I have discovered. While auditing the -mharden-sls=all code
generation in Xen, I found examples where I got "ret int3 ret int3" with no
intervening instructions.
It turns out this is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add Clang's _ExtInt(N) |Implement C2x's n2763
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It's _BitInt in C2X, see N2763 for the final wording. The operator for
computing the width of a type, present in earlier drafts, was removed to
get a minimal version into C2X; I don't kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:04:01PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853
>
> anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99853
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102984
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-28
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102984
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> This is probably the _Temporary_value helper used by std::vector.
Nope, that uses a correctly-aligned buffer.
The misaligned object is the default-initiali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102973
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #14)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #11)
> > >
> > > There should be a diagnostic, but it ought to include cf_check i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51693|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > This was added in r11-5064-g0c81ccc3d87098b93b0e6a2dd76815e4d6e78ff0
>
> Right, thanks. There were a couple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102991
Bug ID: 102991
Summary: [12 regress] gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-17.c fails after
r12-4757
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> This was added in r11-5064-g0c81ccc3d87098b93b0e6a2dd76815e4d6e78ff0
Right, thanks. There were a couple of regressions introduced by this patch,
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102986
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
Bug ID: 102990
Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build, à cp/pt.c:19856
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102951
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6123b998b185572abac7d7224b34f03955bb91a2
commit r12-4776-g6123b998b185572abac7d7224b34f03955bb91a2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #5 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Thanks for that info. It's nice to see the standard is considering that.
Yes, we should add what the standard is going to add, so I'd wait to see what
the standard decides in the end.
Cheers,
Alex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #3 from Alejandro Colomar ---
D'oh.
s/comma/parenthesis/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #2 from Alejandro Colomar ---
There was a missing comma. Fix:
#define __STYPE_MAX(t) (t) 1 << (widthof(t) - 2)) - 1) << 1) + 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #1 from Alejandro Colomar ---
This also triggers the following wish:
'widthof(t)', which would be equivalent to 'sizeof(t) * CHAR_BIT' for normal
types, but would be equal to N in the case of _ExtInt(N).
It could also be used to me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Bug ID: 102989
Summary: Add Clang's _ExtInt(N)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Cooper ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> (In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #11)
> >
> > There should be a diagnostic, but it ought to include cf_check in the type
> > it prints.
>
> Try the v3 patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102988
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code is:
inline namespace __cxx11 {}
template _Tp *__addressof(_Tp);
namespace __cxx11 {
class basic_string {
void _M_set_length();
public:
~basic_string();
void operator=(basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102983
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
This is a bit more interesting.
The IL starts the pass as
:
if (c_3 < b_4)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
:
if (c_3 != 0)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
<...>
:
# c_3 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102988
Bug ID: 102988
Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: hardcbr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102960
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90041
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
As Jakub says in comment #2, this problem is not in a diagnostic format string
that the -Wformat checker sees.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93836
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93836
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102940
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102940
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46aeb5906b8ed7ee255cfbacc5cf9d2f56b850c
commit r12-4773-gd46aeb5906b8ed7ee255cfbacc5cf9d2f56b850c
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102780
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102933
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f70f17d03630fd948bc15a646ebe7e784125c4d4
commit r12-4772-gf70f17d03630fd948bc15a646ebe7e784125c4d4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102984
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is probably the _Temporary_value helper used by std::vector. I already
have a patch to overhaul that so it works in constant expressions, so I'll fix
this too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102984
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> I think this is a user error, I don't think the standard allocator
> guarantees such alignment, you'd need to use your own allocator for the
> container.
It h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89695
--- Comment #5 from Matthijs van Duin ---
So for reference, the Itanium C++ ABI says:
"A type which is trivial for the purposes of the ABI will be passed and
returned according to the rules of the base C ABI, e.g. in registers; often
this has th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #9)
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
> >
> > --- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102780
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9927ecbb42d5be48fa933adc26f8601fab5007ca
commit r12-4769-g9927ecbb42d5be48fa933adc26f8601fab5007ca
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102942
Matthijs van Duin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijsvanduin at gmail dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57029
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
PR84407 was related which was about rounding modes and int-to-float conversion
which means the testcase in this bug should now also be fixed if you supply
-frounding-math which is documented as to determine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84407
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81342e95827f77c0917dd7a9fd54ac9729439c8e
commit r12-4767-g81342e95827f77c0917dd7a9fd54ac9729439c8e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
And even when making ray_sphere static we're not considering to use alternate
argument passing conventions (use 6 SSE regs for the 'double's or 3 for how
the vectors are used to setup the stack right now).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #11)
>
> There should be a diagnostic, but it ought to include cf_check in the type
> it prints.
Try the v3 patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51687|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to hubicka from comment #12)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
> >
> > --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
> > -mtune-ctrl=^sse_unaligned_load_optimal fixes the observ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102961
--- Comment #2 from John Parke ---
I tried your suggestion and removed
>> --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs flag:
../gcc-11.2.0/configure --prefix=/opt/freeware/gcc-11.2.0 --with-as=/usr/bin/as
--with-ld=/usr/bin/ld --enable-languages=c,c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
And before HJs patches to use by_pieces to setup arguments we had code like
pushq 136(%rsp)
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 224
pushq 136(%rsp)
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 232
push
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #12 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
>
> --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
> -mtune-ctrl=^sse_unaligned_load_optimal fixes the observed regression.
Interesting. I s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
-mtune-ctrl=^sse_unaligned_load_optimal fixes the observed regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #10 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
>| b = 2.0 * ray.dir.x * (ray.orig.x - sph->pos.x) +
> #
>| movupd (%rdi),%xmm5
> #
>| 2.0 *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #9 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> Not inlining ray_sphere at -O2 is of course what makes it overall slow.
ray_spehere is not at all that small function. We already play tricks
at -O3 to inline it by detecting that some of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
It _is_ likely STLF.
struct vec3 {
double x, y, z;
};
struct ray {
struct vec3 orig, dir;
};
the vectorized ray_sphere wants { ray.orig.x, ray.orig.y } and
{ ray.dir.x, ray.dir.y } where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102987
--- Comment #2 from Robert Russell ---
Created attachment 51692
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51692&action=edit
this is the build script i was using with creduce. probably not needed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102987
--- Comment #1 from Robert Russell ---
Created attachment 51691
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51691&action=edit
adjusted previous sample closer to my use case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102987
Bug ID: 102987
Summary: [9,10,11,trunk] Segfault when error or warning should
trigger with combination.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
zen
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/CPP/graph?plot.0=198.639.0&plot.1=180.639.0&plot.2=201.639.0&plot.3=150.639.0&plot.4=246.639.0&plot.5=256.639.0&plot.6=176.639.0&;
kabylake
https://lnt.opensuse.org/d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
>
> fixup_cfg already removes write-only stores so that seems fit for that
> purpose.
>
> Btw,
>
> static int x = 1;
>
> int main()
> {
> x = 1;
> }
>
> should ideally be handled as we
>
> fixup_cfg already removes write-only stores so that seems fit for that
> purpose.
>
> Btw,
>
> static int x = 1;
>
> int main()
> {
> x = 1;
> }
>
> should ideally be handled as well as maybe the more common(?)
>
> static int x[128];
>
> int main()
> {
> memset (x, 0, 128*4);
> }
>
xtra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211028 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to hubicka from comment #4)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
> >
> > Richard Biener changed:
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> > --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|cray regression with -O2|[12 regression] cray
|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102985
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That testcase doesn't seem to be valid to me.
While we have only explicit
"A list item that is private within a parallel region, or that appears in the
reduction clause of a parallel construct, must not app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102985
Bug ID: 102985
Summary: [openmp] Bogus "error: lastprivate variable ‘n’ is
private in outer context"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102972
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 51688
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51688&action=edit
Draft patch
Patch works – but causes quite some fails in testsuites (at least in
https://github.com/clang-ykt/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102960
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
Loo
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
