[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #16) > Aldy and I are discussing this. > > Ranger itself can't do anything outside of the gimple IL, its effectively > just a GIMPLE interface to range-ops. ... bu

[Bug sanitizer/100665] New: [hwsanitizer] nested funtion pointer is tagged but never checked.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100665 Bug ID: 100665 Summary: [hwsanitizer] nested funtion pointer is tagged but never checked. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:43:28AM +, yuri at tsoft dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 > > --- Comment #7 from Yuri --- > fpu-387.h is in the gcc10 source tree: > > $ fi

[Bug libstdc++/100664] ranges::drop_view fails to meet its complexity requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100664 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > Hi, in ranges#L2043, the _S_needs_cached_begin of reverse_view is defined as: This is drop_view, sorry for the typo.

[Bug libstdc++/100664] New: ranges::drop_view fails to meet its complexity requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100664 Bug ID: 100664 Summary: ranges::drop_view fails to meet its complexity requirements Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #7 from Yuri --- fpu-387.h is in the gcc10 source tree: > $ find . -name "fpu-*" > ./work/gcc-10.3.0/libgfortran/config/fpu-generic.h > ./work/gcc-10.3.0/libgfortran/config/fpu-sysv.h > ./work/gcc-10.3.0/libgfortran/config/fpu-glibc.

[Bug tree-optimization/100653] usage of scalar_storage_order produces incorrect result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100653 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0, 12.0, 7.3.0 Ever co

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:56:57AM +, yuri at tsoft dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 > > --- Comment #5 from Yuri --- > config.log doesn't contain the IEEE string even

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #5 from Yuri --- config.log doesn't contain the IEEE string even on amd64. libgfortran/configure.host seems to only enable IEEE modules on i?86 | x86_64 architectures through this code: > case "${host_cpu}" in > i?86 | x86_64) >

[Bug c++/100261] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or type_decl, have error_mark in emit_tinfo_decl, at cp/rtti.c:1643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fff482625ab184210d9121515b9ea98945dc0b6f commit r11-8434-gfff482625ab184210d9121515b9ea98945dc0b6f Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100372] [11/12 Regression] ICE with variadic template template, internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100372 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74ad5558d2acddcf4f5e96129ec29dd2f3d47d3a commit r11-8433-g74ad5558d2acddcf4f5e96129ec29dd2f3d47d3a Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug jit/95415] Add support for thread-local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50842 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50842&action=edit Patch to add this feature I created a patch to add TLS variables.

[Bug c++/100261] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or type_decl, have error_mark in emit_tinfo_decl, at cp/rtti.c:1643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01b2864757540d24c4e717a77b40b29369c064b2 commit r12-895-g01b2864757540d24c4e717a77b40b29369c064b2 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug c++/100372] [11/12 Regression] ICE with variadic template template, internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100372 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:061fe8c58ac4d436906a404f7fb46b0a6e0d7b4f commit r12-894-g061fe8c58ac4d436906a404f7fb46b0a6e0d7b4f Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:47:30PM +, yuri at tsoft dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 > > --- Comment #3 from Yuri --- > On amd64 gcc installs the file finclude/ieee_ar

[Bug libstdc++/100606] Please complete LWG3490: ranges::drop_while_view::begin() is missing a precondition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #3 from Yuri --- On amd64 gcc installs the file finclude/ieee_arithmetic.mod and on aarch64 this file isn't installed. What is installed is defined by the gcc build process.

[Bug libstdc++/100663] dietlibc build fail 'FP_NAN' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100663 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #2 from Yuri --- intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic works fine on amd64/i386 architectures on the same OS. What do you think is missing/wrong in the OS that causes it?

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/100644] [11/12 regression] Deleted move constructor prevents templated constructor from being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100644 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6384e940a6db379b0524465cf6cbbd0996b48485 commit r11-8431-g6384e940a6db379b0524465cf6cbbd0996b48485 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100205] [11/12 Regression] error: invalid use of non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b786dafe9eb933f23686c68c6d7110fef5656985 commit r11-8430-gb786dafe9eb933f23686c68c6d7110fef5656985 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/93314] [9/10 Regression] Invalid use of non-static data member causes ICE in gimplify_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b786dafe9eb933f23686c68c6d7110fef5656985 commit r11-8430-gb786dafe9eb933f23686c68c6d7110fef5656985 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100261] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or type_decl, have error_mark in emit_tinfo_decl, at cp/rtti.c:1643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/100663] New: dietlibc build fail 'FP_NAN' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100663 Bug ID: 100663 Summary: dietlibc build fail 'FP_NAN' was not declared in this scope Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) Looking some more into this: I couldn't find a consistent concept of setting variables to implicit-save as e.g. described in F2018 section 8.5.16 clause 4. A

[Bug c++/100372] [11/12 Regression] ICE with variadic template template, internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100372 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/98617] Failure to recognize pack expansion argument for non-pack parameter of alias template when alias is "exact"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98617 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Please provide the actual code, not only a CE link: template struct Base {}; template using A = Base; template using B = Base; template using C = Base; template using AliasA = A; // this should fai

[Bug c++/98617] Failure to recognize pack expansion argument for non-pack parameter of alias template when alias is "exact"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/100619] [11/12 Regression] ICE: in build_attr_access_from_parms, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5038 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/100205] [11/12 Regression] error: invalid use of non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205 --- Comment #11 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de --- Awesome, thank you, Jason!

[Bug c++/99976] gcc accepts requires-clause contains unexpanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99976 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/99967] gcc accepts declaration type contains unexpanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99967 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84337] Variadic expansion is accepted on not parameter pack template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84337 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/100658] Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-18 Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's not glibc-specific though, it's going to be in the next POSIX standard and other C libraries. It's a bit of a hack, but you could include any libstdc++ header and then check _GLIBCXX_USE_PTHREAD_COND

[Bug target/99314] [Patch] [RISC-V] g++.dg/opt/memcpy1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c114759b8c9c9e2ec90b82d92a24b5a71647017 commit r12-886-g8c114759b8c9c9e2ec90b82d92a24b5a71647017 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug c++/100205] [11/12 Regression] error: invalid use of non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c114759b8c9c9e2ec90b82d92a24b5a71647017 commit r12-886-g8c114759b8c9c9e2ec90b82d92a24b5a71647017 Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug c++/100644] [11/12 regression] Deleted move constructor prevents templated constructor from being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100644 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f71ca97def69b8aeb046d716eaea2367736f505e commit r12-885-gf71ca97def69b8aeb046d716eaea2367736f505e Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug libstdc++/100639] reverse_iterator::reference erroneously uses iterator_traits::reference instead of iter_reference_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- The assertion also fails when __int128 isn't available (which can be simulated by compiling with -U__SIZEOF_INT128__), because in that case iota_view's difference_type is the integer-like class type __max_di

[Bug fortran/100662] New: intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 Bug ID: 100662 Summary: intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/100602] [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100602 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug libstdc++/100639] reverse_iterator::reference erroneously uses iterator_traits::reference instead of iter_reference_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug fortran/100656] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-18 Statu

[Bug c/100661] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661 Bug ID: 100661 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/100593] [ELF] -fno-pic: Use GOT to take address of an external default visibility function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593 --- Comment #8 from Fangrui Song --- Seems that -fno-plt -fno-pic does have the required properties. A side effect is that all external calls use the (x86-64) call *f@GOTPCREL(%rip) (x86-32) call *f@GOT form. The instruction is one byte long

[Bug c/100660] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100660 Bug ID: 100660 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2451 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100659] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 Bug ID: 100659 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 --- Comment #1 from Michael de Lang --- It'd be fairly trivial to wrap the test in an ifdef: #ifdef __GLIBC__ #if (__GLIBC__ >= 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__>= 30) || __GLIBC__>= 3 // test here #endif #endif

[Bug testsuite/100658] New: Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 Bug ID: 100658 Summary: Typos in dg commands and texi files Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug target/100657] New: [GCN offloading] 'libgomp.c-c++-common/reduction-6.c' execution times out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100657 Bug ID: 100657 Summary: [GCN offloading] 'libgomp.c-c++-common/reduction-6.c' execution times out Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: open

[Bug fortran/100656] New: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656 Bug ID: 100656 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/100655] New: 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 Bug ID: 100655 Summary: 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug analyzer/100615] analyzer failed to report leak in rxtxcpu's parse_cpu_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100615 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd323d97d0592135ca4345701ef051659d8d4507 commit r12-884-gcd323d97d0592135ca4345701ef051659d8d4507 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug c++/100367] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error when std::lexicographical_compare_three_way third and fourth argument are reverse iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100367 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/100654] New: trunk bootstrap errors with -O0 and -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100654 Bug ID: 100654 Summary: trunk bootstrap errors with -O0 and -O1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: boots

[Bug c++/100205] [11/12 Regression] error: invalid use of non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100644] [11/12 regression] Deleted move constructor prevents templated constructor from being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100644 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-18 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #20 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #19) > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #18) > > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #17) > > > Richard Sandiford had a series of patc

[Bug target/100637] [i386] Vectorize 4-byte vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46ca31d65092e5afcef292f807fcf14c5363280d commit r12-883-g46ca31d65092e5afcef292f807fcf14c5363280d Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue Ma

[Bug tree-optimization/100653] New: usage of scalar_storage_order produces incorrect result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100653 Bug ID: 100653 Summary: usage of scalar_storage_order produces incorrect result Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/100652] Unexpanded parameter pack in partial specialization of variable template not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/100649] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in coerce_template_parms (releases) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100649 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > Confirmed. Compiled without errors with GCC 7. The error is properly issued in C++11 mode (-std=c++11): t.cpp: In member function 'void B::foo(const A<32>&)': t.cpp:12:23: error: 'mesg' is not a constan

[Bug fortran/100642] [12 Regression] ICE in omp_code_to_statement, at fortran/openmp.c:6907 since r12-20-ga61c4964cd714462

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100642 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100652] New: Uexpanded parameter pack in partial specialization of variable template not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652 Bug ID: 100652 Summary: Uexpanded parameter pack in partial specialization of variable template not rejected Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c++/87765] Internal compiler error: coerce_template_parms (8.2) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87765 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/100649] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in coerce_template_parms (releases) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100649 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100649] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in coerce_template_parms (releases) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100649 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The ICE appeared with r251423.

[Bug c++/100649] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in coerce_template_parms (releases) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100649 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 CC|

[Bug fortran/100642] [12 Regression] ICE in omp_code_to_statement, at fortran/openmp.c:6907 since r12-20-ga61c4964cd714462

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100642 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc193ac840d58ee0ffb57b14b542706cde3db0e7 commit r12-881-gcc193ac840d58ee0ffb57b14b542706cde3db0e7 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Tu

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50837|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/100631] ranges::elements_view:: _Sentinel is missing __distance_from() that can access _M_current of _Iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38751c4d5e15bd1c682ac4c868a2c4ce48ca5503 commit r12-880-g38751c4d5e15bd1c682ac4c868a2c4ce48ca5503 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug fortran/100651] New: Weird memory corruption with multiple triggers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 Bug ID: 100651 Summary: Weird memory corruption with multiple triggers Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- That patch isn't OK, because the declarations in would still be present, but using them would give linker errors. I think we should just check __SIZE_WIDTH__ < 32 (in that .cc file and in the header). I

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3) > Btw, we already disable the floating-point to_chars on targets without a > binary64 double. So is our test for detecting binary64 not accurate enough,

[Bug libstdc++/100631] ranges::elements_view:: _Sentinel is missing __distance_from() that can access _M_current of _Iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #7) > (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #6) > > The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e2eef80ac0c21f9533e6791ccf5e29458cbb77c

[Bug target/100626] [11/12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault (during RTL pass: split1) since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d39fbed75810fc7478842503ecb0268b85dc9c2e commit r12-878-gd39fbed75810fc7478842503ecb0268b85dc9c2e Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue Ma

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- Created attachment 50837 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50837&action=edit Proposed patch This patch fixes the problem for eSi-RISC and bootstraps on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu , with

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Patrick, is the table an optimization, or essential? We might be able to > avoid it, but he functions would be much slower. The tables are essential for Ryu's

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug analyzer/100546] -Wanayzer-null-dereference false positive through noreturn function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100546 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100650] New: Passing a derived-type array constructor to the reshape intrinsic gives incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100650 Bug ID: 100650 Summary: Passing a derived-type array constructor to the reshape intrinsic gives incorrect results Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50835 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50835&action=edit Patch add support for sized integer types That patch not only add support for 128-bit integers, but also all other siz

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 18 May 2021, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 > > --- Comment #14 from bin cheng --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12

[Bug c++/100649] New: ICE in coerce_template_parms (releases) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100649 Bug ID: 100649 Summary: ICE in coerce_template_parms (releases) or cxx_eval_constant_expression (trunk) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #14 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > So in number_of_iterations_ne it looks like the step 's' is always constant > which makes me wonder if we can somehow use ranger to tell multiple_of_p > (type, c,

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #13 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > (In reply to bin cheng from comment #9) > > Seems we have a long standing bug in fold-const.c:multiple_of_p in case of > > wrapping types. Take unsigned int as a

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug other/100598] [12 Regression] MinGW Canadian cross toolchain fails to build due to missing BASEVER in genversion.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100598 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug other/100598] [12 Regression] MinGW Canadian cross toolchain fails to build due to missing BASEVER in genversion.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100598 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5116b54e4644cb0d7b99891c76f8f015097f6530 commit r12-872-g5116b54e4644cb0d7b99891c76f8f015097f6530 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to bin cheng from comment #9) > Seems we have a long standing bug in fold-const.c:multiple_of_p in case of > wrapping types. Take unsigned int as an example: > (0xfffc * 0x3) % 0x3 = 0x1 >

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- The intent of this particular test is to test how orphaned distribute works and was done before the host teams construct support has been added, which means we do not want the target teams visible in the ind

[Bug middle-end/100593] [ELF] -fno-pic: Use GOT to take address of an external default visibility function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov --- Thanks. I agree that inferring address significance on the linker side is problematic. Thinking about your original request, I was about to say that it would be very reasonable to do under -fno-plt flag

[Bug target/100369] crash after error in gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vgetq_lane_s64_indices_1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100369 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.1.0, 9.3.0 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > Hmm, I reproduced the problem on the original test-case: > libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c, and minimized from there: > ... > $ cat libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-c

[Bug target/100369] crash after error in gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vgetq_lane_s64_indices_1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100369 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.0 CC|

  1   2   >