[Bug bootstrap/97355] [11 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-10-12 2:18 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Guess nobody will feel responsible without more info ... maybe you can bisect > or provide a good initial hint (last known good rev. v

[Bug tree-optimization/97354] ice during GIMPLE pass: slp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97354 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, possibly a dup of PR97347, this fixed by 5d708c6315e0fc57992cda7b466a5a9877ced4e3

[Bug c++/97372] Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-12 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/97371] [11 Regression] evrp problem with gcc.target/s390/pr77822-2.c and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97371 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|evrp problem with |[11 Regression] evrp

[Bug target/97366] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Redundant load with SSE/AVX vector intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97366 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||93943 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/97365] gcvt and qgcvt do not always provide requested precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97365 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97360] [11 Regression] ICE in range_on_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Summary|ICE in range_on

[Bug middle-end/97357] [10 Regression] Unable to coalesce ssa_names which are marked as MUST COALESCE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97357 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to fail|

[Bug c++/97358] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE while building firefox since r8-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97358 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/97377] New: Segmentation fault while compiling Marlin code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97377 Bug ID: 97377 Summary: Segmentation fault while compiling Marlin code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/97356] [11 regression] several test case failures after r11-3748

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97356 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug bootstrap/97355] [11 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/97354] ice during GIMPLE pass: slp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97354 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/97353] -Wuninitialized should warn about reading condition in do-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97353 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug c++/97376] New: Function type to function pointer type adjustment for non-type template paramter does not work when using decltype(auto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97376 Bug ID: 97376 Summary: Function type to function pointer type adjustment for non-type template paramter does not work when using decltype(auto) Product: gcc Versi

[Bug c++/97375] New: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375 Bug ID: 97375 Summary: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/97286] GCC sometimes uses an extra xmm register for the destination of _mm_blend_ps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Seems similar issue as PR97366?

[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Guess you want to figure what built the (vec_select:V8QI (V16QI)) and if > it was appropriately simplified (and simplify_rtx would handle this case). > In any case

[Bug middle-end/97374] missing essential detail in array parameter overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97374 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- This was prompted by warnings like the one below in a build of the kernel: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3062:9: warning: ‘intel_print_wm_latency’ reading 16 bytes from a region of size 10 [-Wstringop-overr

[Bug middle-end/97374] missing essential detail in array parameter overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97374 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Martin Seb

[Bug middle-end/97374] New: missing essential detail in array parameter overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97374 Bug ID: 97374 Summary: missing essential detail in array parameter overflow warning Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/97373] missing warning on sprintf into allocated destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97373 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85741 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/97373] New: missing warning on sprintf into allocated destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97373 Bug ID: 97373 Summary: missing warning on sprintf into allocated destination Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/68288] botched floating-point UDL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68288 --- Comment #4 from Yuriy Solodkyy --- P.S. I added my previous example to this bug as they seemed to be related, feel free to split it into a separate bug if they are not. P.P.S. Change that return expression to 42_sp-p and the parser seems to

[Bug tree-optimization/97360] ICE in range_on_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/68288] botched floating-point UDL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68288 Yuriy Solodkyy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||solodon at mail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/97372] Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 --- Comment #4 from marian --- Running gcc under valgrind with the original testcase produces some interesting output. These binaries of course barely have any symbols at all, but it might at least provide a hint: ==882380== Invalid read of size

[Bug c++/97372] Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 --- Comment #3 from marian --- Created attachment 49344 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49344&action=edit CVise differently reduced reproducer (possibly a different bug as well) Attached automatically reduced reproducer does

[Bug c++/97372] Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 --- Comment #2 from marian --- Created attachment 49343 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49343&action=edit CVise reduced reproducer (possibly a different bug) Attached testcase.ii was produced with CVise from the original rep

[Bug c++/97372] Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 --- Comment #1 from marian --- Created attachment 49342 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49342&action=edit pre-processed reproducer

[Bug c++/97372] New: Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 Bug ID: 97372 Summary: Segmentation fault using Tracy 0.7.3 in template class Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libfortran/97063] [ MATMUL intrinsic] The value of result is wrong when vector (step size is negative) * matrix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97063 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-October/055169.html

[Bug c/97371] evrp problem with gcc.target/s390/pr77822-2.c and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97371 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code is int a, b; void c() { if (b >> 38) a = b; }

[Bug c/97371] New: evrp problem with gcc.target/s390/pr77822-2.c and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97371 Bug ID: 97371 Summary: evrp problem with gcc.target/s390/pr77822-2.c and -O3 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug libfortran/97063] [ MATMUL intrinsic] The value of result is wrong when vector (step size is negative) * matrix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97063 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug c/97370] comedy of boolean errors for '!a & (b|c)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97370 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/97369] undefined reference to std::_***""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97369 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- If that's a linker error not a run time error, then it looks like you're not using the right GCC to link. It could be that you're compiling with GCC 6.3.0 but then using a different GCC to link, which doesn

[Bug libstdc++/97369] undefined reference to std::_***""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97369 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/97370] New: comedy of boolean errors for '!a & (b|c)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97370 Bug ID: 97370 Summary: comedy of boolean errors for '!a & (b|c)' Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/97366] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Redundant load with SSE/AVX vector intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97366 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug libstdc++/97369] New: undefined reference to std::_***""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97369 Bug ID: 97369 Summary: undefined reference to std::_***"" Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/71414] 2x slower than clang summing small float array, GCC should consider larger vectorization factor for "unrolling" reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414 Freddie Witherden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freddie at witherden dot org --- Com

[Bug fortran/96655] [OOP] CLASS dummy arguments: Bogus "Duplicate OPTIONAL attribute specified"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96655 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97323] [10/11 Regression] ICE 'verify_type' failed on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97323 Fabio changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pedretti.fabio at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c/97368] randomly build failure for mesa with lto on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97368 Fabio changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97368] randomly build failure for mesa with lto on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97368 Fabio changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |c --- Comment #1 from Fabio --- >From the error

[Bug lto/97368] New: randomly build failure for mesa with lto on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97368 Bug ID: 97368 Summary: randomly build failure for mesa with lto on armhf Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libstdc++/70358] Several 26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators etc. tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70358 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Rainer, what's the status of this one? Are those tests still UNSUPPORTED, or > now PASSing? Looking back at old testresults, the tests were F

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Looks like this is still failing for solaris 11: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-October/610818.html True. However, t

[Bug target/97367] New: powerpc64 g5 and cell optimizations result in .machine power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367 Bug ID: 97367 Summary: powerpc64 g5 and cell optimizations result in .machine power7 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal