[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-30 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1) > for i386 backend, maybe we can adjust pattern of > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md > index 934b60a288f..2bfa9635fab 100644 > --- a/gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- for i386 backend, maybe we can adjust pattern of diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md index 934b60a288f..2bfa9635fab 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md @@

[Bug c++/97246] [10/11 regression] mismatched argument pack lengths since r10-7865-gaedd04caa945260e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] New: Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 Bug ID: 97249 Summary: Missing vec_select and subreg optimization Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/97246] [10/11 regression] mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10.1 regression] |[10/11 regression] |m

[Bug target/97248] New: [mips] unrecognizable insn when left shifting uint64 vector by scalar with MSA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97248 Bug ID: 97248 Summary: [mips] unrecognizable insn when left shifting uint64 vector by scalar with MSA Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/96968] aarch64 : ICE in vregs or expand pass, lowering __builtin_aarch64_get_{fpcr,fpsr,fpcr64,fpsr64}

w0, 0 add sp, sp, 16 .cfi_def_cfa_offset 0 ret .cfi_endproc LFE0: .ident "GCC: (GNU) 11.0.0 20200929 (experimental)" .subsections_via_symbols

[Bug ipa/97244] [11 Regression] ICE in ipa_edge_args_sum_t::duplicate at gcc/ipa-prop.c:4251 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97244 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/97188] [11 Regression] ICE passing a null VLA to a function expecting at least one element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97188 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97188] [11 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer at c/c-objc-common.c:314 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97188 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:873f8c1e6df94a9dcbfbe69f06538e3e45ba151d commit r11-3540-g873f8c1e6df94a9dcbfbe69f06538e3e45ba151d Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug c++/94695] Implement -Wrange-loop-analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94695 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- First part of the warning is now implemented.

[Bug c++/94695] Implement -Wrange-loop-analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94695 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:969baf03acd8124345617cea125b148568c7370a commit r11-3539-g969baf03acd8124345617cea125b148568c7370a Author: Marek Polacek Date: Th

[Bug analyzer/95188] analyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler shows wrong statement for signal registration event

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- The above patch fixes (a) from comment #7 above, but (b), (c) and (d) still need fixing, so keeping this open for now.

[Bug analyzer/95188] analyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler shows wrong statement for signal registration event

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d60d63a00bb50ba6896939705c589578177b404d commit r11-3537-gd60d63a00bb50ba6896939705c589578177b404d Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug bootstrap/97183] zstd build failure for gcc 10 on Ubuntu 16.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97183 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6649df18f98d5baf89b56a09b816b5eeb5f67bcb commit r11-3536-g6649df18f98d5baf89b56a09b816b5eeb5f67bcb Author: Jim Wilson Date: Mon Sep

[Bug c/97206] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in composite_type, at c/c-typeck.c:447 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97206 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch --- Comment #7 f

[Bug preprocessor/96952] __builtin_thread_pointer support cannot be probed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96952 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, I didn't say none of them come from configure. What I meant by "checking anything at configure time" is anything related to the properties of the compiler that ends up including the header. Not *anythin

[Bug analyzer/95188] analyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler shows wrong statement for signal registration event

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Thanks. I see a similar deluge of "terminating analysis for this program point" warnings, but at different locations. My warnings eventually terminate with: bzip2.c:1537:31: warning: analysis bailed ou

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffe2a432ac553b45b954fa24c8cbb9cc373bfbc6 commit r10-8827-gffe2a432ac553b45b954fa24c8cbb9cc373bfbc6 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue S

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dec881f85abbddc6e37630b6e61ce621cea6acd7 commit r11-3531-gdec881f85abbddc6e37630b6e61ce621cea6acd7 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Sep 29 11:

[Bug preprocessor/96952] __builtin_thread_pointer support cannot be probed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96952 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > Sorry, but it doesn't work. How do you suggest libstdc++ should use > configure-time checks to find out what features are present in the compiler > including the libstdc++ headers later? I don't know what t

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Typo in |Typos in --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- The updated patch w

[Bug target/97247] Typo in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug target/97247] New: Typo in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 Bug ID: 97247 Summary: Typo in Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned a

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Resolution|---

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:528348fca9a9a29ba40a32df8f1a0dc95b101aa7 commit r8-10554-g528348fca9a9a29ba40a32df8f1a0dc95b101aa7 Author: Hongyu Wang Date: Mo

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97bbda2c7e29e39719278055bcc7b07a5e89eba3 commit r9-8957-g97bbda2c7e29e39719278055bcc7b07a5e89eba3 Author: Hongyu Wang Date: Mon

[Bug analyzer/95188] analyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler shows wrong statement for signal registration event

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188 --- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard --- Created attachment 49291 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49291&action=edit Output for gcc -Wanalyzer-too-complex -g -O2 -fanalyzer -c bzip2.c (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93212f3e15c5e13cb1eed430e880f35edc108b13 commit r10-8826-g93212f3e15c5e13cb1eed430e880f35edc108b13 Author: Hongyu Wang Date: M

[Bug c++/97246] New: [10.1 regression] mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246 Bug ID: 97246 Summary: [10.1 regression] mismatched argument pack lengths Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/97222] GCC discards attributes aligned and may_alias for typedefs passed as template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97222 Mateusz Zych changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_

[Bug target/96700] undefined reference to `failure_on_line_796'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96700 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/95188] analyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler shows wrong statement for signal registration event

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Thanks Mark. What architecture are you on? When I do those steps, there's a long wait and then in terminates with no analyzer output. If I add -Wanalyzer-too-complex I see lots of warnings about "terminati

[Bug c/97206] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in composite_type, at c/c-typeck.c:447 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97206 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Testing this fix: diff --git a/gcc/attribs.c b/gcc/attribs.c index abc75368e6c..262e4b8f7b9 100644 --- a/gcc/attribs.c +++ b/gcc/attribs.c @@ -2278,7 +2278,7 @@ attr_access::array_as_string (tree type) const

[Bug c++/97195] construct_at on a union member is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97195 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/97245] New: ASSOCIATE intrinsic does not recognize a ponter variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 Bug ID: 97245 Summary: ASSOCIATE intrinsic does not recognize a ponter variable the second time it is used Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug preprocessor/96952] __builtin_thread_pointer support cannot be probed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96952 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) > What about detecting the support at configure time and defining a macro > during the compilation? Everyone has been doing this for more that 3 > decades... So

[Bug middle-end/95673] missing -Wstring-compare for an impossible strncmp test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95673 Franz Sirl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug preprocessor/96952] __builtin_thread_pointer support cannot be probed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96952 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > The whole point of __has_builtin is to let you avoid the configure-time > checks on compilers that support __has_builtin. If __has_builtin doesn't > actually work, it's pointless that it even exists and ind

[Bug sanitizer/97229] pointer-compare sanitizer is very slow due to __asan::IsAddressNearGlobal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-29 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug preprocessor/96952] __builtin_thread_pointer support cannot be probed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96952 --- Comment #5 from Rich Felker --- The whole point of __has_builtin is to let you avoid the configure-time checks on compilers that support __has_builtin. If __has_builtin doesn't actually work, it's pointless that it even exists and indeed ever

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues in gcc that other static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer, PVS-studio) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 94433, which changed state. Bug 94433 Summary: enhancement: 12 * constify some parameters https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug analyzer/94433] enhancement: 12 * constify some parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97241] [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6503 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97241 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39a27bb01aa223ce89946f0a4de6b60c4c0b03d2 commit r11-3527-g39a27bb01aa223ce89946f0a4de6b60c4c0b03d2 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97241] [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6503 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/97054] [10/11 Regression] Runtime segfault with attached test code since r10-3559

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97054 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug analyzer/95188] analyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler shows wrong statement for signal registration event

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188 --- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard --- Note that I can replicate it with the instructions in the description and gcc git: gcc (GCC) 11.0.0 20200916 (experimental) $ /opt/local/install/gcc/bin/gcc -g -O2 -fanalyzer -c bzip2.c 2>&1 | head -25 bzip2

[Bug tree-optimization/97241] [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6503 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97241 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug ipa/97244] New: [11 Regression] ICE in ipa_edge_args_sum_t::duplicate at gcc/ipa-prop.c:4251 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97244 Bug ID: 97244 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in ipa_edge_args_sum_t::duplicate at gcc/ipa-prop.c:4251 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug ipa/97244] [11 Regression] ICE in ipa_edge_args_sum_t::duplicate at gcc/ipa-prop.c:4251 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97244 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/97243] [11 Regression] ICE in compute_parm_map at gcc/ipa-modref.c:1368 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97243 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-29 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/97243] New: [11 Regression] ICE in compute_parm_map at gcc/ipa-modref.c:1368 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97243 Bug ID: 97243 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in compute_parm_map at gcc/ipa-modref.c:1368 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confi

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49288 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49288&action=edit Another test-case Another test-case that started to fail with r10-1361-g9f962469cabc7fdc.

[Bug middle-end/64928] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, lucier at math dot purdue.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 > > --- Comment #32 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- > I don't know precisely

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49287 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49287&action=edit Reduced test-case Reduced test-case that started to fail on master with r11-205-gbc484e250990393e with -O3.

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11.0|8.4.1 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed f

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d68f4d2ecb8ed6781e4e535d2abc498b1674d68a commit r11-3525-gd68f4d2ecb8ed6781e4e535d2abc498b1674d68a Author: Hongyu Wang Date: Mon Sep 28

[Bug tree-optimization/97238] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_assign_rhs_code (gimple.h:2797) with -O since r11-2577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97238] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_assign_rhs_code (gimple.h:2797) with -O since r11-2577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97238 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29aef377d814bd342dd5a306f99e0d614623ce0e commit r11-3524-g29aef377d814bd342dd5a306f99e0d614623ce0e Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97241] [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6503

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ta

[Bug target/96789] x264: sub4x4_dct() improves when vectorization is disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/64928] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #32 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- I don't know precisely what you're saying, but it compiles fine without the instrumentation.

[Bug fortran/97242] New: Pointer assignment: Noncontiguous target to contiguous pointer wrongly accepted.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97242 Bug ID: 97242 Summary: Pointer assignment: Noncontiguous target to contiguous pointer wrongly accepted. Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/97241] New: [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6503

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97241 Bug ID: 97241 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6503 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-v

[Bug tree-optimization/97238] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_assign_rhs_code (gimple.h:2797) with -O since r11-2577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97238 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, just came to the same conclusion ;)

[Bug tree-optimization/97238] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_assign_rhs_code (gimple.h:2797) with -O since r11-2577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/97239] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/97238] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_assign_rhs_code (gimple.h:2797) with -O since r11-2577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97238 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 Ev Drikos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug analyzer/97240] New: Analyzer runs out of memory building C++ source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97240 Bug ID: 97240 Summary: Analyzer runs out of memory building C++ source Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/97239] New: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97239 Bug ID: 97239 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on

[Bug tree-optimization/97238] New: [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_assign_rhs_code (gimple.h:2797) with -O

8e4eee-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 20200929 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/97237] [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Toni Neubert from comment #0) > The following valid code: N.B. that's not valid at all. That's why you need to use -fpermissive to compile it. > But this code is valid in all versions: No,

[Bug c++/97237] [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- It surprises me -fpermissive ever accepted such bogosities. Also using -fpermissive with C++11 and later code is very weird, -fpermissive is about letting some very old unmaintained code compile, but using th

[Bug c++/97237] [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97237] New: [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 Bug ID: 97237 Summary: [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/97235] [11 Regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4251 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97235 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, started with r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c.

[Bug ipa/97235] [11 Regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4251 since r11-3478-gada353b87909fd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97235 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/97228] [11 regression] New ICEs on arm since r11-3426 g:10843f8303509fcba880c6c05c08e4b4ccd24f36

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Targe

[Bug ipa/96394] [10/11 Regression] ICE in add_new_edges_to_heap, at ipa-inline.c:1746 (-O3 PGO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug ipa/96394] [10/11 Regression] ICE in add_new_edges_to_heap, at ipa-inline.c:1746 (-O3 PGO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49283 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49283&action=edit Single file test-case

[Bug tree-optimization/96979] [9/10/11 Regression] Switch with case values derived from constexpr function takes unreasonable time to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96979 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e46858e445d35ca4a7df1996186fe884879b commit r11-3519-ge46858e445d35ca4a7df1996186fe884879b Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug preprocessor/96952] __builtin_thread_pointer support cannot be probed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96952 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/97235] [11 Regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/97228] [11 regression] New ICEs on arm since r11-3426 g:10843f8303509fcba880c6c05c08e4b4ccd24f36

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] New: [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 Bug ID: 97236 Summary: [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [10/11 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/64928] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #31 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to lucier from comment #30) > I'm coming back to this project. > > I naively thought "Well, I don't need arc profiling, I'll just set > -ftest-coverage without -fprofile-arcs" but it appears that

[Bug libbacktrace/97082] new test 'mtest' fails for Mach-O/Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97082 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #2) > Does btest pass? It's hard to see why mtest would fail if btest passes. current results [darwin16, darwin19] are: PASS: allocfail.sh PASS: test_elf_32 PASS: t