https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96436
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2a0fd7c8ff426cc40ec678efef85e4a376ea4b5
commit r11-2777-gc2a0fd7c8ff426cc40ec678efef85e4a376ea4b5
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96720
Bug ID: 96720
Summary: ICE with* after include
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96713
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96713
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f5951bd95e334d611f4be7bbe1a136c580f9c20
commit r11-2776-g2f5951bd95e334d611f4be7bbe1a136c580f9c20
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96719
Bug ID: 96719
Summary: non-standard handling of alias templates used as
template template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
Bug ID: 96718
Summary: [11 regression] 25_algorithms/pstl/feature_test-3.cc
has excess error after r11-2743
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96717
Bug ID: 96717
Summary: -flifetime-dse=2 breaks webkit-gtk-2.28.4
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 09:36:32PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
>
> --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> A very quick hack seems t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A very quick hack seems to solve the issue for me. For some reason the
final fold_convert seems to create a problem. Does anybody know why?
It there a shorter solution?
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96713
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96199
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
Bug ID: 96716
Summary: GCC reports "object is private" when it's accessed
through proper accessor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96715
Bug ID: 96715
Summary: Failure to optimize copysign of variable by negated
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96714
Bug ID: 96714
Summary: Failure to optimize sqrt*sqrt of same variable with
ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
Toon Moene changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toon at moene dot org
--- Comment #7 from T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96712
Toon Moene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
ead model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200819 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96042
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6e01618e83bcd9eb3a2b27df30ed87106a748b4
commit r11-2773-ge6e01618e83bcd9eb3a2b27df30ed87106a748b4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96712
Bug ID: 96712
Summary: internal compiler error: in build_round_expr, at
fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:399
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96643
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96705
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96699
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96643
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23ebfda0e352fa0a92c6b012458ecb65505a135f
commit r11-2772-g23ebfda0e352fa0a92c6b012458ecb65505a135f
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96705
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc02b568e2cd3f6a28d4b7c1063bbf8842c89aad
commit r11-2771-gfc02b568e2cd3f6a28d4b7c1063bbf8842c89aad
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96699
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:366bd1ac01a5249a463e64234674ad2d174faa9a
commit r11-2770-g366bd1ac01a5249a463e64234674ad2d174faa9a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94858
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
It looks like we lose the:
cluster for: (*INIT_VAL(td_14(D)))
ESCAPED
key: {kind: direct, start: 0, size: 64, next: 64}
value: ‘hashNx *’ {&HEAP_ALLOCATED_REGION(0)}
at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Trivial workaround.
program nint_error
implicit none
integer(kind=16) :: m
real(8) :: x, y
x = 1
y = x - 1
m = anint(y)
print *, m
end
This will use libqu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94858
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-19
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085
Tendel10 at protonmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Tendel10 at protonmail do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96042
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:386fd16c551188e20d5b1684b7139e4269f9a739
commit r11-2766-g386fd16c551188e20d5b1684b7139e4269f9a739
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96042
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #3 from B Eggen ---
Here is the latest f90 file:
program nint_error
integer :: n, m
integer(kind=16) :: i, j, nint
integer, parameter :: idp=selected_real_kind(9,99)
integer, parameter :: i16=selected_int_kind(38)
real(k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #2 from B Eggen ---
adding the compiler flag -fdefault-integer-8 extends the range somewhat, but I
really require NINT() to work for whole range (up to 2^127-1):
-> ./nint_error.e
i16= 16 170141183460469231731687303715884105727
1 1 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
B Eggen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bre08 at eggen dot co.uk
--- Comment #1 from B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
Bug ID: 96711
Summary: Internal Compiler Error on NINT() Function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96710
Bug ID: 96710
Summary: __int128 vs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96709
Bug ID: 96709
Summary: cmov and vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/GKnj17
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94234
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Feng Xue :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:459f6f68a75fe88e7c8309ca8ad3244a532b0d8e
commit r11-2764-g459f6f68a75fe88e7c8309ca8ad3244a532b0d8e
Author: Feng Xue
Date: Mon Jun 1 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61372
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Crocker from comment #5)
> You seem to be assuming that C++ exceptions can propagate through functions
> compiled with a C compiler.
I'm not assuming anything. I know for a fact that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61372
--- Comment #5 from David Crocker ---
You seem to be assuming that C++ exceptions can propagate through functions
compiled with a C compiler. On most platforms, they normally cannot, because a
C compiler does not produce the information needed fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96706
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||nvptx
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96705
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96708
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
PS: This especially affects, for example, C++ code that uses std::max, which
fails to optimize properly compared to, for example, a `max` macro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96708
Bug ID: 96708
Summary: Failure to optimize max pattern with comparison when
using a temporary variable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96707
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
PS: This transformation can also be done with a very similar pattern where the
return statement is replaced with this : `return (x / y) <= x;`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96707
Bug ID: 96707
Summary: Failure to optimize right shift+unsigned compare of
two variables optimally
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96706
Bug ID: 96706
Summary: [nvptx] compilation failure of pr89663-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96682
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Joe Ramsay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10e0d2010f0597e6ae7efb88142b8820608c585e
commit r10-8643-g10e0d2010f0597e6ae7efb88142b8820608c585e
Author: Joe Ramsay
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96705
Bug ID: 96705
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at
tree.c:1612 with -fanalyzer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69f571ffc513b689fa26e4c9fceba17c2c989ab3
commit r11-2759-g69f571ffc513b689fa26e4c9fceba17c2c989ab3
Author: Antony Polukhin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96704
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, it's incorrect to assume begin and end return the same type for a range.
Use std::common_iterator if you need to turn an iterator and its sentinel into
a single type:
using CI = std::common_itera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 49080
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49080&action=edit
another testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96704
Gleb Natapov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96704
--- Comment #1 from Gleb Natapov ---
Ah, those appears to be sentinel iterators.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #3)
> Ah, thanks for the pointer.
>
> I thought I had used -O0 in the larger project as well, but I hadn't.
>
> Just as a suggestion, would it make sense to apply the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96704
Bug ID: 96704
Summary: begin() and end() iterators of views::values_view have
different type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96703
Bug ID: 96703
Summary: Failure to optimize combined comparison of variables
and of variable with 0 to two comparisons with 0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96702
Bug ID: 96702
Summary: Failure to optimize comparisons involving result of
subtraction
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96701
Bug ID: 96701
Summary: Failure to optimize self right-shift to 0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70462
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Let's keep that discussion in PR 95428 rather than in a resolved bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96548
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Richi is on vacation. I'm pretty sure he'll quick it as soon as he gets back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96548
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
This bug has been hanging about for over a week now without resolution.
Is the best way to get this into Richard's intray to assign it to him ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96548
cnsun at uwaterloo dot ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cnsun at uwaterloo dot ca
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96494
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96494
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eaf11417b6a017b21a5052a74be3d2a251cfb78
commit r11-2756-g9eaf11417b6a017b21a5052a74be3d2a251cfb78
Author: Tom de Vries
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96072
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Finally, yet another testcase which also plays games w/ SP but, unlike the
previous two, does not involve its "manual" manipulation.
void
he (int jn)
{
{
int bh[jn];
if (jn != 0)
goto wa;
71 matches
Mail list logo
