https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96162
Bug ID: 96162
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in discriminator_for_local_entity,
at cp/mangle.c:1910
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96160
--- Comment #4 from plevine457 at gmail dot com ---
The offending command is
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.1.0-r1/work/build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.1.0-r1/work/build/./gcc/ -xc++ -nostdinc
> /dev/null -S -o /dev/n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066
--- Comment #2 from Antoni ---
An attempt to use, let's say, __atomic_fetch_add_4, will result in a error
like:
libgccjit.so: error: unimplemented primitive type for builtin (type: BT_I4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59135
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96161
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-10
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Bill Seurer
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21d3be2159f1b55e903caa2b1f80369d3681902b
commit r10-8463-g21d3be2159f1b55e903caa2b1f80369d3681902b
Author: Bill Seurer
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96160
--- Comment #3 from plevine457 at gmail dot com ---
> Which make version are you using?
GNU Make 4.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549880.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Actually make that
using T = int[1];
T&& arr = static_cast(42);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
I don't know if this is supposed to be valid now too:
int arr[1] = static_cast(42);
or
using T = int[];
int arr[1] = static_cast(42);
but it seems so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96160
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Makefile.in:
GCC_PASSES=xgcc$(exeext) specs
SELFTEST_DEPS = $(GCC_PASSES) stmp-int-hdrs $(srcdir)/testsuite/selftests
c/Make-lang.in
C_SELFTEST_DEPS = cc1$(exeext) $(SELFTEST_DEPS)
...
s-selftest-c: $(C_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96161
Bug ID: 96161
Summary: istream::ignore sets eofbit too soon
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96160
--- Comment #1 from plevine457 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 48861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48861&action=edit
gcc-10.1.0-xgcc-selftest-makeopts.patch
This patch appears to resolve the issue on my end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96160
Bug ID: 96160
Summary: Building gcc with multiple make jobs fails with:
gcc/xgcc: No such file or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96159
--- Comment #2 from Martin Uecker ---
Clang produces a call to __atomic_load.
Also here is a godbolt link: https://godbolt.org/z/39PE1G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96159
--- Comment #1 from Martin Uecker ---
On x86-64 the following struct has alignment 4 but gcc
creates a single mov instruction which according to my
understanding may fail to be atomic when it crosses a
cache line boundary.
Documentation seem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96159
Bug ID: 96159
Summary: atomic creates incorrect code for possible isaligned
struct
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
Bug ID: 96158
Summary: Symbols not emitted for module common variables
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70c884a4b82733027ac0e2620d09169b177080d7
commit r11-2026-g70c884a4b82733027ac0e2620d09169b177080d7
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96086
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a0b69f0b089c05d233b8e1a941825b1ceac93bd
commit r11-2025-g8a0b69f0b089c05d233b8e1a941825b1ceac93bd
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92789
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96151
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92789
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efe99cca78215e339ba79f0a900a896b4c0a3d36
commit r11-2022-gefe99cca78215e339ba79f0a900a896b4c0a3d36
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96151
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:510125d2272175f47b26227fbe9b8c8c5abfd988
commit r11-2023-g510125d2272175f47b26227fbe9b8c8c5abfd988
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efe99cca78215e339ba79f0a900a896b4c0a3d36
commit r11-2022-gefe99cca78215e339ba79f0a900a896b4c0a3d36
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
This already works:
// P1975R0
struct Aggr { int x; int y; };
int
main ()
{
Aggr a = static_cast(1);
if (a.x != 1 || a.y != 0)
__builtin_abort ();
}
but we generate
q.C: In function ‘int main()’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|bootstrap fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #33 from Mike Stump ---
Please, unless you expect it to work in an OS independent way, please
conditionalize on the systems it is known to work on, meaning, it important for
it to work on it, you think all the work for it to work on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96157
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
If I were to propagate TREE_ADDRESSABLE from S to the static array, then the
assert doesn't trigger.
However, there lots of breakages that occur elsewhere within the front-end, so
a little more extra handling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96125
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96157
Bug ID: 96157
Summary: d: No NRVO when returning an array of a non-POD struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96151
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96156
Bug ID: 96156
Summary: d: No RVO when returning struct literals initialized
with constructor.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96155
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554
Klaus Rudolph changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lts-rudolph at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96125
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45b7f80f2e591d4f674d2f0798d31d51a7e46a72
commit r10-8458-g45b7f80f2e591d4f674d2f0798d31d51a7e46a72
Author: Peter Bergner
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96155
Bug ID: 96155
Summary: "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function
fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96151
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This compile is successful like this but fails if I add -mcpu=power9.
/home2/sawdey/work/gcc/mamboCI/build-mambo/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home2/sawdey/work/gcc/mamboCI/build-mambo/./prev-gcc/
-B/opt/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96154
Bug ID: 96154
Summary: d: Add -Wvarargs warning flag to compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #32 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu ---
>> If this is a Linux-only feature, shouldn't the tests rather be
>> restricted to Linux instead? It certainly also fails on freebsd,
>> darwin, min
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96153
Bug ID: 96153
Summary: d: struct literals have non-deterministic hash values
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96152
Bug ID: 96152
Summary: d: associative array literals don't have alignment
holes filled.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #30)
> > --- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> >> > --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
> >> > (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96151
Bug ID: 96151
Summary: bootstrap fails due to ICE in c_omp_split_clauses
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48858
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48858&action=edit
gcc11-pr96130.patch
So, my fix would be like this (untested except on the testcase so far).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
>> > --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
>> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My understanding of the problem is that set_switch_stmt_execution_predicate
figures out that the default: is unreachable (operand is a bitfield with values
0 to 7 and there are cases for all 8) and notes that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> > --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
> >> > --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
> >> > -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
>> > --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
>> > -fpatchable-function-entry and -mfentry gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
> > --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
> > -fpatchable-function-entry and -mfentry generate special instruction
> > sequence at function entry. Does Sol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
> -fpatchable-function-entry and -mfentry generate special instruction
> sequence at function entry. Does Solaris support such special
> instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #24)
> > --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
> > Do -fpatchable-function-entry and -mfentry work on Solaris?
>
> I don't have the slightest idea what that wou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase from the other PR which is shorter:
struct S { unsigned j : 3; };
int k, l, m;
void
foo (struct S x)
{
while (l != 5)
switch (x.j)
{
case 1:
case 3:
case 4:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96150
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96150
Bug ID: 96150
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in analyze_function_body on
switch since r10-3199
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bill Seurer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6b7ba5de624f2a17d799bac5ff017cd065ce035
commit r11-2018-gc6b7ba5de624f2a17d799bac5ff017cd065ce035
Author: Bill Seurer, 507-253-3502,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8/9/10/11 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96149
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The two single-element interleaving cases are expected to be SLP vectorized
where the target needs a splat operation (permute of two doubles {0, 0}).
Ah, the reason is the aarch64 speciality that forces loa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
> Do -fpatchable-function-entry and -mfentry work on Solaris?
I don't have the slightest idea what that would mean, and the
descriptions of the optio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59135
Bernd Baumanns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||familiebaumanns at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95694
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Just realised that this breaks bootstrap on arm-linux-gnueabihf.
I'd originally moved the zeroing of incorrect targets to
expand_expr_real_2, but then forgot why and undid it in the
name of goi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96149
Bug ID: 96149
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/slp-46.c on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96148
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e969e9be88e83871ef66f4cd1592db7e8ae6244b
commit r11-2017-ge969e9be88e83871ef66f4cd1592db7e8ae6244b
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96148
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96148
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-10
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96143
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-10
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96052
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
commit r11-2014-ge47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95976
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
commit r11-2014-ge47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96105
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
commit r11-2014-ge47dfca5aa473e77fdff95d631dc39de87a41eec
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96105
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bb330022ce47a3e8966a9930f392e497c608f59
commit r10-8456-g3bb330022ce47a3e8966a9930f392e497c608f59
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96052
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bb330022ce47a3e8966a9930f392e497c608f59
commit r10-8456-g3bb330022ce47a3e8966a9930f392e497c608f59
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95976
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bb330022ce47a3e8966a9930f392e497c608f59
commit r10-8456-g3bb330022ce47a3e8966a9930f392e497c608f59
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96148
Bug ID: 96148
Summary: [11 regression]
gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indir-call-topn-[12].c
UNRESOLVED
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96148
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #12 from Ingo Weyrich ---
Thanks for fixing and kudos for your very fast response time!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96144
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96144
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6645a826f58b68f68dff30e6e6e78542099d0cc
commit r11-2013-ga6645a826f58b68f68dff30e6e6e78542099d0cc
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jul 9 14:5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96093
--- Comment #2 from claudio daffra ---
error disappear when i put at top of include file , probably ...
FLAGS=-std=c11 -Wall -Wextra -pedantic
LIBRARYS=-lm ... link without header
boh .. can you close.
Il giorno mer 8 lug 2020 alle ore 23:4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96144
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8614106f121db118f9db260b9949883485d0bbf6
commit r10-8455-g8614106f121db118f9db260b9949883485d0bbf6
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Sorry, scratch that last message. The optimisation is of course
correct in that case. ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
FWIW, it doesn't look like this is specific to POLY_INT_CST.
A gimple reproducer shows a similar thing:
void __GIMPLE (ssa, startwith("vrp2"))
foo (volatile int *x)
{
int i;
__BB(2):
goto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Sorry about that! I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Apparently we've got a patch in queue that does something similar:
+fprofile-prefix-path=
+Common·Joined·RejectNegative·Var(profile_prefix_path)
+remove·prefix·from·absolute·path·before·manging·name·for·-fpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e41c27bf549d957eb399d39d7d0c213f8733351
commit r11-1981-g6e41c27bf549d957eb399d39d7d0c213f8733351
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96144
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
This shows in multiple testsuite fails on x86-64 as well.
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512er-vrsqrt28ps-3.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512er-vrsqrt28ps-3.c (test for excess errors)
UNRES
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96147
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 48856
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48856&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 slp-45.c.163t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96147
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96147
Bug ID: 96147
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
