https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Sorry, scratch that last message. The optimisation is of course correct in that case. ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Sorry, scratch that last message. The optimisation is of course correct in that case. ;-)