https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46539
Andrew B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at blamsoft dot com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93540
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93540
Bug ID: 93540
Summary: Attributes pure and const not working with aggregate
return types, even trivial ones
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93539
Bug ID: 93539
Summary: memmove over self with result of string function not
eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93538
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
A better (well-defined) test case involves memmove:
$ cat a.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall -fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout -o/dev/stdout
a.c
struct A { char a[3]; };
void f (struct A *a)
{
void *p = a;
void *q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93538
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
(I noticed this while testing my fix for bug 93519.)
Here's a (strictly undefined) test case involving memcpy where the lack of
folding it prevents the call from being eliminated (it is ultimately eliminated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93538
Bug ID: 93538
Summary: equality of address of first member to address to
enclosing object not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #130 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-01 5:12 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> At this point I have noticed that the objdump could not be executed while
> running tests. Adding binutils-2.32 that I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #129 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #127)
> On 2020-01-25 9:16 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> > As can be seen above, stage1 binaries are just under 9 times the size of
> > final
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #128 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #125)
> On 2020-01-25 7:59 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> > Please let me know what you would like me to try next.
> Let's look at testsuite log in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93537
Bug ID: 93537
Summary: gcc 9.2 takes a Segmentation Violation when compiled
file
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
This is similar to --gc-sections
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93536) but a bit different.
The only reasonable fix I can think of is to place __patchable_function_entries
in the same section g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93536
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
__patchable_function_entries
.align 8
.quad .LPFE2
.section.text._start
.LPFE2:
nop
.LFB3:
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE3:
.size _start, .-_start
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 10.0.1 20200201 (experimental)"
.section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93197
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
>
> > (A more concerning issue is that __patchable_function_entries can be
> > stripped by -Wl,--gc-sections , as the bug I linked above describes)
>
> I opened:
>
> https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91218
Brian Rago changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ragobria at msu dot edu
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93535
Bug ID: 93535
Summary: slow float/double simple constant folding with -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92844
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> I think that is or could be a duplicate of PR 92305
PR92305 has been fixed. Can you re-check whether the issue of this PR still
occurs?
At least when trying it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #7)
> > Is -fasynchronous-unwind-tables compatible with -fpatchable-function-entry?
>
> Apparently the Linux kernel does not care about it. To make it usable in
> userspace,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47760|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91824
--- Comment #7 from Ivan Sorokin ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Fixed.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93534
Bug ID: 93534
Summary: Overloading of Variadic function templates are not be
ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93533
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47761&action=edit
gcc10-pr93533.patch
Full untested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93533
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93533
Bug ID: 93533
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE due to popcounthi2 expansion with
-march=z196 since r10-3720
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:add31061ec23e07fdf749dc335308efc81151a3d
commit r10-6393-gadd31061ec23e07fdf749dc335308efc81151a3d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
31 matches
Mail list logo
