https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #129 from Peter Bisroev <peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com> --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #127) > On 2020-01-25 9:16 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote: > > As can be seen above, stage1 binaries are just under 9 times the size of > > final > > -O2 compiled binaries. I believe you have mentioned that this is due the > > use of > > -O0 for stage1 compilation. But is such increase as seen above expected? > The stage1 sizes are much larger than I would have expected. However, I > wouldn't worry > about it since the compiler can rebuild itself. There must be a long > pattern in ia64.md that's > used a lot. > > Let's focus on issues important for c++. Understood, thank you for the explanation. Will concentrate on getting updated test results as per my prior comment. Will get back to you as soon as I have them. Thanks!
