https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
Bug ID: 92927
Summary: Bootstrap failed with CXXFLAGS="-O0"
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
On 11/28/19 12:58 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Now, the issues:
> 1) (so far ignored); the standard says that classes where all virtual members
> are immediate are still polymorphic,
> but I gu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92150
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 13 05:09:57 2019
New Revision: 279332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92150 - partial specialization with class NTTP.
Here unify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92859
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 13 05:10:06 2019
New Revision: 279334
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279334&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92859 - ADL and bit-field.
We also need unlowered_expr_typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92446
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 13 05:10:02 2019
New Revision: 279333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92446 - deduction of class NTTP.
Another place we need to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 13 05:10:11 2019
New Revision: 279335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57082 - new X{} and private destructor.
build_new_1 alread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92496
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92496
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 13 05:05:51 2019
New Revision: 279331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92496 - ICE with <=> and no #include .
* typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86659
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a C testcase which I will be adding by the end of the week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92926
Bug ID: 92926
Summary: Wrong code generated because of shared tree node in
gimplify
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 13 00:09:34 2019
New Revision: 279327
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279327&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/92904
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_gimplify_va_arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92925
Bug ID: 92925
Summary: RTl expansion throws away alignment info
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92653
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, we need to reimplement call_once to not use pthread_once at all, for any
targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #26 from Paul Adobe ---
It may be interesting to note that we recently ended up tracking a change in
glibc to making this a problem on x86_64 architectures. Apparently when they
refactored pthread_once in glibc patch 2.17.288 it chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92902
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It appears that the simplification of the %len fails.
implicit none
type t
character :: c
end type t
type(t), parameter :: x = t('a')
integer, parameter :: l = x%c%len ! error
! i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92496
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47483&action=edit
concept patch for subroutine vs. function
Here is a concept patch for subroutine vs. function. I have moved
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly reduced testcase:
implicit none
type t
character :: c
end type t
type(t), parameter :: x = t('a')
integer, parameter :: l = x%c%len ! ICE
! integer, parameter :: l = x%c%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92898
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92898
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Thu Dec 12 20:46:03 2019
New Revision: 279315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-12 Harald Anlauf
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92898
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Thu Dec 12 20:39:48 2019
New Revision: 279314
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279314&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-12 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/92898
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92902
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jean-Christophe Dubois from comment #15)
> Am I missing something?
YES. Most likely it will not be loaded in the instruction cache as it is
larger than the cache line size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92902
--- Comment #15 from Jean-Christophe Dubois ---
Thanks for the feedback and the support.
Now maybe this is not the good place to ask question but I am wondering:
Most of today's processors have separate data and instruction cache. Isn't it
sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
Bug ID: 92924
Summary: [10 regression] reproducible indirect call profile
merging causes 80% slowdown in Firefox
pref-reftest-singletons id-getter microbenchmarks
Product: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86416
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> I think the output by LTO is correct but not very helpful:
>
> lto1: fatal error: unsupported mode 'XF' (for long double)
> lto1: fatal error: unsupported mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92870
--- Comment #3 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Thu Dec 12 18:01:18 2019
New Revision: 279310
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279310&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Committed, testsuite] Fix PR92870
With my recent commit, I added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92923
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Looking at rs6000-builtin.def, we have the same issue with __builtin_vec_and(),
__builtin_vec_or(), etc., etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86416
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92923
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92923
Bug ID: 92923
Summary: __builtin_vec_xor() causes subregs to be used when not
using V4SImode vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think this is related to the *movsi_compare0 ARM define_ins which prevents
obvious cleanups, so we end up with:
(insn 97 90 98 24 (parallel [
(set (reg:CC 100 cc)
(compare:CC (re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92920
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 47482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47482&action=edit
Draft patch – does not handle firstprivate()
This is a rather complete patch – but it currently fails if
fir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
-*-*
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /opt/gcc/gcc-20191212/Build/gcc/xgcc
-B/opt/gcc/gcc-20191212/Build/gcc/ -mabi=ilp32 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never
-fdiagnostics-urls=never -std=c90 -O1 -g -DTEST_FULL -march=armv8.2-a+sve
-fno-ipa-icf -c -o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92920
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
BTW: Stumbled over this when looking at the OpenMP 4.5 test suite at
https://github.com/SOLLVE/sollve_vv/issues/41
and their 'defaultmap' test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92921
Bug ID: 92921
Summary: Feature request: Automatic transliteration of AT&T
inline asm into Intel syntax
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 91573, which changed state.
Bug 91573 Summary: Vectorization failure for a loop to do multiply-add because
SLP loads unnecessarily require permutation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91573
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91573
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 91573, which changed state.
Bug 91573 Summary: Vectorization failure for a loop to do multiply-add because
SLP loads unnecessarily require permutation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91573
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92920
Bug ID: 92920
Summary: [OpenMP][OpenACC] Implicit mapping of character
scalars (nonalloc/nonptr) – shall be firstprivate not
tofrom
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92843
--- Comment #12 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For an adaptation of the refcount checking code as alluded to above -- see
PR92848.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92848
--- Comment #6 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47479
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47479&action=edit
Regressions with rc checking enabled
These are the OpenACC tests that regress with refcount checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92848
jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47451|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92848
--- Comment #5 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47478
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47478&action=edit
Refcount checking for current trunk
Hi,
This is a merge of the refcount checking patch to current tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Nothing has happened on this for over a month.
Who would be best placed to look deeper into this problem ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92919
Bug ID: 92919
Summary: invalid memory access in wide_str_to_charconst when
running ucn2.C testcase (caught by hwasan)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92901
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, openacc
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Known t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92846
--- Comment #3 from claziss at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: claziss
Date: Thu Dec 12 08:42:21 2019
New Revision: 279274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARC] generate signaling FDCMPF for hard float comparisons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92568
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> In OpenMP 4.5 (2.19.7)
That should be: OpenMP 4.5, 2.15.5
63 matches
Mail list logo
