https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090
Xiong Hu XS Luo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70257
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> I think this is a dup of bug 79106.
>
...or possibly the other way around? Since that one is newer...
> The caret line is printed by reopening the file a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82459
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79419
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92273
fdlbxtqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92272
--- Comment #1 from fdlbxtqi ---
*** Bug 92273 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Derived)
|^
cqwrteur@DESKTOP-7H7UHQ9:/mnt/d$ gcc --version
gcc (cqwrteur) 10.0.0 20191029 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNES
Derived)
|^
cqwrteur@DESKTOP-7H7UHQ9:/mnt/d$ gcc --version
gcc (cqwrteur) 10.0.0 20191029 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNES
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92263
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
The patch adds a RISC-V movcc pattern. This causes toplev.c to enable
flag_tree_cselim. This optimization pass creates a complex long double
conditional move via a phi node.
complex long double cstore_31;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92271
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92270
Yuki Wada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92271
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> We need to also handle -Xassembler? Since -Wa, doesn't work with comma in
> assembler options, like -mfoo=foo1,foo2, one needs to use
>
> -Xassembler -mfoo=foo1,foo2
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92271
Bug ID: 92271
Summary: for consistency, __is_same_as should be named
__is_same
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 29 21:09:21 2019
New Revision: 277594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92201
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_expr): If gimpli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90998
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE |[9 Regression] ICE
|(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90998
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Oct 29 21:06:21 2019
New Revision: 277593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/90998 - ICE with copy elision in init by ctor and -Wconv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:58:47 2019
New Revision: 277592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92201
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_expr): If gimpli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:34:43 2019
New Revision: 277591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91548 - fix detecting modifying const objects for ARRAY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342
--- Comment #34 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:20:23 2019
New Revision: 277590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, PPC] Fix PR 65342.
The current Darwin load/store lo_sum patterns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91495
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No (the parallel versions are in those branches either).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67183
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:16:28 2019
New Revision: 277587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, machopic] Fix for 67183
When we're using the LLVM-based assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:05:05 2019
New Revision: 277584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with relocations.
Darwin's linker doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92270
Bug ID: 92270
Summary: Non-const ref treated as const-ref in the compiler.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92263
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
OK, I get it now. You are using non-standard optimization options with a
testsuite testcase. I can reproduce when I use your compiler options. I will
take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Oct 29 19:52:20 2019
New Revision: 277582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.
For compatibility with x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS should be defined as 1 by default.
The comment in front of the define there is incorrect for newer kernels which
force the legacy system calls not be to defined (t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
--- Comment #12 from f.hollerer at gmx dot net ---
(In reply to Gregory Fuchedzhy from comment #10)
> (In reply to f.hollerer from comment #8)
> > To my understanding assert() uses __FILE__ and __LINE__. I would like to
> > have a command line opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
--- Comment #11 from f.hollerer at gmx dot net ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #9)
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, f.hollerer at gmx dot net wrote:
>
> > This would:
> >
> > - shorten the output of assert()
> > - minimize the image
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #8 from fdlbxtqi ---
Line 211
#ifndef SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS
# if defined(__aarch64__) && SANITIZER_LINUX
# define SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS 1
# else
# define SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS 0
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-linux-gnu, windows |x86_64-linux-gnu
|subs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #6 from fdlbxtqi ---
I have examined the source code of the unistd.h in Microsoft WSL2. The same
thing, these syscalls were removed as well.
https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel/blob/7fec2bd4a7fd7a952e3e5ea2202bef963aa4781d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92263
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
I did a cross compiler build and check yesterday using up-to-date sources and
did not see this failure. I've been testing regularly. I did my build on an
x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04 machine with gcc-5.4 as the system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
Andrew Sutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #5 from fdlbxtqi ---
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/a0673fdbcd42105261646cd4f3447455b5854a32
It looks like all these system calls are removed in unistd.h in Linux kernel.
/*
* All syscalls below here should go away
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Just to pile on here. It affects icecat as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 92182, which changed state.
Bug 92182 Summary: No way to silence ''A::TKind' is too small to hold all
values of 'enum Kind''
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92182
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92182
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83806
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91495
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugs at m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
--- Comment #10 from Gregory Fuchedzhy ---
(In reply to f.hollerer from comment #8)
> To my understanding assert() uses __FILE__ and __LINE__. I would like to
> have a command line option which let __FILE__ expand to the last path
> component (th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92269
Bug ID: 92269
Summary: Profiling (-p) does not work on H8
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 29 17:14:55 2019
New Revision: 277577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92267 fix ABI change in deque iterators
Defaulting the copy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, f.hollerer at gmx dot net wrote:
> This would:
>
> - shorten the output of assert()
> - minimize the image size due to shorter strings
> - make the build reproduceable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(Comment 1 was wrong)
A workaround is to replace the compound-requirement with a simple-requirement
that depends on a function constrained with the desired constraint:
template void workaround(I) { }
te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 92144, which changed state.
Bug 92144 Summary: [10 regression] c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-4.c still fails
after r277080
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92144
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92144
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92144
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Oct 29 16:14:18 2019
New Revision: 277576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR testsuite/92144
* c-c++-commo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Oct 29 16:14:18 2019
New Revision: 277576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR testsuite/92144
* c-c++-commo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC with -flto does not |GCC with -flto does not
|pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83806
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Noack ---
Can confirm, that it is fixed in 8.3.0 and 9.2.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The workaround is to require that the common_reference_t types exist:
template
concept common_reference_with
=
//
requires { typename common_reference_t;
typename common_reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
Bug ID: 92268
Summary: Constraint normalization substitutes parameter too
early
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92235
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
same with r277529
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92265
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and there's also the case where
VPINSR[BWDQ]
takes a GPR (or memory) to insert int a XMM reg. PINSRW is available
with SSE2, the B/Q/D variants with SSE4.1.
It's also only the non-zero lane inserts t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.3.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems to be due to r260380
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Just for the record, the compilation takes now ~2:30 hours.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92260
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92260
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 29 13:46:19 2019
New Revision: 277571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92260
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Preprocessing with GCC 8 and then compiling with GCC 9 doesn't crash, so it's
due to a change in libstdc++ headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Bug ID: 92267
Summary: crash with a cppunit test case (built by GCC 9) and
cpptest (built with GCC 8)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88915
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Tue Oct 29 13:15:46 2019
New Revision: 277569
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277569&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[vect]PR 88915: Vectorize epilogues when versioning loops
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92266
Bug ID: 92266
Summary: Duplicate code generation for live stmts from SLP
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92265
Bug ID: 92265
Summary: [x86] Dubious target costs for vec_construct
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Host|x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92186
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68781
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 91662, which changed state.
Bug 91662 Summary: [concepts] unable to deduce placeholder type, should be
accepted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91662
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91662
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67658
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91487
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frederik.engels24 at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91466
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91467
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91405
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90675
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90398
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90396
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90033
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67491
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79682
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77755
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
