https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92268
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(Comment 1 was wrong)
A workaround is to replace the compound-requirement with a simple-requirement
that depends on a function constrained with the desired constraint:
template<forward_iterator I> void workaround(I) { }
template<typename T>
concept F = requires (T& t) { workaround(t.begin()); };
