[Bug go/91617] [10 regression] Many go test case failures after r275026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91617 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or something is wrong in the go FE langhooks. Anyway, I have no idea how to debug this, the libgo libgo.log doesn't contain anything that would make it clear how to run the tests and even looking at the simpl

[Bug fortran/91552] ICE with valid array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91552 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/91587] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91587 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/91587] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91587 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Aug 31 03:27:45 2019 New Revision: 275241 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275241&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91587

[Bug fortran/91587] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91587 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Aug 31 00:32:48 2019 New Revision: 275236 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275236&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91587

[Bug c++/91622] New: Compiler internal error DJGPP GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91622 Bug ID: 91622 Summary: Compiler internal error DJGPP GCC Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug go/91617] [10 regression] Many go test case failures after r275026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91617 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The cited revision was not to libgo, so my assumption is that there was something wrong with it and there is nothing to change in the Go frontend. Let me know if I'm mistaken. This was also filed as http

[Bug fortran/91565] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/91565] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Aug 30 23:30:35 2019 New Revision: 275230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91565

[Bug fortran/91564] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91564 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/91564] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91564 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Aug 30 23:19:30 2019 New Revision: 275229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91564

[Bug fortran/91551] [9/10 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.c:4193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91551 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/91551] [9/10 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.c:4193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91551 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Aug 30 23:02:37 2019 New Revision: 275228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275228&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91551

[Bug c++/91618] template-id required to friend a function template, even for a qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91618 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r249385.

[Bug c++/91618] template-id required to friend a function template, even for a qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91618 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFI

[Bug go/91621] New: libgo/mksysinfo.sh: please avoid test ==

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91621 Bug ID: 91621 Summary: libgo/mksysinfo.sh: please avoid test == Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #21 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:38:09PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig --- > (In reply to anlauf from comment #14) > > The current solution is a bit annoying for impl

[Bug target/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 --- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson --- By the way, the underlying problem here is, as Andrew Waterman mentioned, that the RISC-V linker does aggressive link time relaxations to reduce code size, and this makes lib128 with label subtraction unsafe. T

[Bug target/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 --- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson --- The wiki is wrong. Combined tree builds should not be used anymore. Combined tree builds date back to when Cygnus was maintainer for everything. We put everything in a single source tree, and wrote configure

[Bug c++/91607] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in equal, at cp/constexpr.c:1088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/91606] [9/10 regression] Optimization leads to invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91606 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Fri Aug 30 20:02:13 2019 New Revision: 275224 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275224&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, X86, testsuite] Add xfails for PR90698. We don't have support for

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #20 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:43:54PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 > > --- Comment #19 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Thomas Koe

[Bug target/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- >Combined tree builds are obsolete and shouldn't be used anymore.) Huh? Where is that documented. In fact the wiki still recommends a combined build. Combined builds make building easier.

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #19 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #18) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #14) > > The current solution is a bit annoying for implicitly-derived interfaces. > > > > Consider a code like: >

[Bug libstdc++/91620] [forward_]list::remove_if should respect to DR 526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91620 --- Comment #1 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com --- (The issue number in the case seems a typo. It is introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL358534.)

[Bug c++/91620] New: [forward_]list::remove_if should respect to DR 529

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91620 Bug ID: 91620 Summary: [forward_]list::remove_if should respect to DR 529 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug rtl-optimization/64895] RA picks the wrong register for -fipa-ra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Fri Aug 30 19:00:44 2019 New Revision: 275213 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275213&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Backport fix for 64895 XPASSes. These tests don't fail

[Bug target/91605] [10 Regression] ICE in ix86_avx256_split_vector_move_misalign, at config/i386/i386-expand.c:489 since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91605 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- Hmm, for whatever reason the decl-align of the "to" is 256 bit normally but when -fpack-struct is used only 8 bit aligned, but it is a reg. The reason for the ICE is that the movmisalign optab is rightfully

[Bug middle-end/91599] GCC does not say where warning is happening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Aug 30 17:49:17 2019 New Revision: 275211 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275211&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91599 - GCC does not say where warning is happening gcc/Cha

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 91599, which changed state. Bug 91599 Summary: GCC does not say where warning is happening https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/91599] GCC does not say where warning is happening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/91584] [9 Regression] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/91584] [9 Regression] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Aug 30 17:42:57 2019 New Revision: 275210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275210&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91584 - Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assi

[Bug testsuite/91619] New: New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr81740-2.c fails on powerpc64 power7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91619 Bug ID: 91619 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr81740-2.c fails on powerpc64 power7 BE Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/91618] New: template-id required to friend a function template, even for a qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91618 Bug ID: 91618 Summary: template-id required to friend a function template, even for a qualified-id Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #15 from Jack Lloyd --- Thanks for the fast fix and backporting

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90474] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P set on a variable with address taken; error: invalid address operand in MEM_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90474 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/90194] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:5244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/90071] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90071 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/89677] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89677 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 90213, which changed state. Bug 90213 Summary: UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 What|Remo

[Bug tree-optimization/90213] UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/90930] Excessive memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90930 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/89677] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89677 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90071] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90071 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90474] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P set on a variable with address taken; error: invalid address operand in MEM_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90474 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug debug/90194] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:5244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90194 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90930] Excessive memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90930 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/90637] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_loop_versioning, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:3055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90637 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90213] UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:44:17 2019 New Revision: 275208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90930] Excessive memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90930 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:37:43 2019 New Revision: 275207 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275207&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/90637] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_loop_versioning, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:3055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90637 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:37:43 2019 New Revision: 275207 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275207&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/91108] [8 Regression] Fails to pun through unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91108 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91108] [8 Regression] Fails to pun through unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91108 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 30 16:33:05 2019 New Revision: 275206 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275206&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-30 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug target/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug libstdc++/51333] [7/8 Regression] cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also fixed for 8.4

[Bug tree-optimization/83661] sincos does not handle sin(2x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Monat --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #5) > sincos performs range reduction for the argument just once, which is fairly > important. A well-optimized sincos also shares some computations for the > si

[Bug go/91617] New: [10 regression] Many go test case failures after r275026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91617 Bug ID: 91617 Summary: [10 regression] Many go test case failures after r275026 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/83661] sincos does not handle sin(2x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov --- sincos performs range reduction for the argument just once, which is fairly important. A well-optimized sincos also shares some computations for the sin/cos parts, as done in https://github.com/ARM-softwa

[Bug tree-optimization/83661] sincos does not handle sin(2x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Monat --- Hi Pratamesh, You're absolutely right - maybe it's more efficient when there is some hardware sincos available (Intel FSINCOS ?) but I would check also carefully the actual performance. Indeed, it looks

[Bug fortran/80645] FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_3.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645 --- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor --- r274996 finally correctly disabled -Wstringop-overflow (and other language-specific middle-end warnings) for Fortran (and other languages they're not meant for) so that might explain why the fails have disapp

[Bug tree-optimization/83661] sincos does not handle sin(2x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oh, I thought sincos simultaneously calculated values of sin and cos ? If that's not the case, then I wonder how is sincos transform itself beneficial ? Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug target/91612] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/aapcs/align4.c ICE after r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91612 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/91616] New: Incorrect data address computation in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91616 Bug ID: 91616 Summary: Incorrect data address computation in very simple code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug libstdc++/51333] [7/8 Regression] cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 30 15:01:10 2019 New Revision: 275192 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275192&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/51333 Define recursive_init_error constructor non-inline T

[Bug libstdc++/91308] [7/8 Regression] unique_ptr assignment fails with different deleters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91308 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 30 15:01:15 2019 New Revision: 275193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275193&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/91308 fix constraints on unique_ptr assignment Backport fro

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- There are also 2 regressions in gfortran --target armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16 gfortran.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr32377.f90 -O (internal compiler error) gfortran.dg/vect/p

[Bug target/91615] New: [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 Bug ID: 91615 Summary: [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug debug/91611] debug info for register keyword variables at O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91611 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Also, consider test2.c (as test2.c in PR91610, but with register keyword for variable l in wack_signed_char): ... #include signed char add_signed_char (signed char u, signed char v) { return u + v; } sign

[Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- The same is true --with-cpu cortex-a57 --with-fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8

[Bug target/91614] New: [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614 Bug ID: 91614 Summary: [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/91613] New: [10 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr83930.c ICE since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91613 Bug ID: 91613 Summary: [10 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr83930.c ICE since r274986 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/91612] New: [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/aapcs/align4.c ICE after r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91612 Bug ID: 91612 Summary: [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/aapcs/align4.c ICE after r274986 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/91611] debug info for register keyword variables at O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91611 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- FWIW, the debug experience does not feel very O0-ish because of the missing "b = a" assignment. Using this demonstrator patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.c b/gcc/lra-spills.c index a322da81544..db18ff432

[Bug debug/91611] New: debug info for register keyword variables at O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91611 Bug ID: 91611 Summary: debug info for register keyword variables at O0 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug debug/91610] New: fvar-tracking degrades -O0 debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91610 Bug ID: 91610 Summary: fvar-tracking degrades -O0 debug info Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 30 14:25:36 2019 New Revision: 275186 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275186&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-08-23 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 30 14:23:55 2019 New Revision: 275185 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275185&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-08-22 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug libstdc++/85965] [8/9/10 Regression] G++ gives cryptic error instead of incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 30 14:17:20 2019 New Revision: 275182 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275182&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-08-23 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug libstdc++/78179] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78179 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |8.4

[Bug libstdc++/78179] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78179 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 30 14:17:41 2019 New Revision: 275183 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275183&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78179 fix std::hypot failures due to excessive tolerance Ba

[Bug libstdc++/89164] can construct vector with non-copyable-but-trivially-copyable elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk now.

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 30 14:15:39 2019 New Revision: 275181 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275181&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-08-22 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug c++/91609] New: friend declaration not honoured

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91609 Bug ID: 91609 Summary: friend declaration not honoured Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/88075] [feature-request] allow "concept" instead of "concept bool" with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c++/88075] [feature-request] allow "concept" instead of "concept bool" with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC 7 doesn't support the -std=c++2a option, so it doesn't seem necessary to backport it to GCC 7.

[Bug libstdc++/89164] can construct vector with non-copyable-but-trivially-copyable elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 30 13:54:49 2019 New Revision: 275177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275177&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/89164 enforce constraints for uninitialized algos The memmo

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 30 13:53:11 2019 New Revision: 275176 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275176&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-08-23 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug debug/90197] [8 Regression] Cannot step through simple loop at -O -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90197 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/90733] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/90231] ivopts causes iterator in the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231 Bug 90231 depends on bug 90197, which changed state. Bug 90197 Summary: [8 Regression] Cannot step through simple loop at -O -g https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90197 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Aug 30 13:51:26 2019 New Revision: 275175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275175&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-08-22 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug libstdc++/90770] Building with --enable-libstdcxx-debug and make profiledbootstrap fails with mv: cannot stat 'Makefile': No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90770 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 30 13:50:01 2019 New Revision: 275172 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275172&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90770 fix missing src/debug/Makefile Backport from mainline

[Bug c/89520] [7 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed operand 4 of call_expr with 3 operands in convert_to_integer_1, at convert.c:668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89520 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59994] [meta-bug] thread_local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994 Bug 59994 depends on bug 60702, which changed state. Bug 60702 Summary: thread_local initialization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60702 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/78884] [7/8] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   4   >