https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #18 from Qi Feng ---
I only learned gcc for about 2 months, and I have to say that I don't fully
understand what you guys were saying. Is match.pd the right place to fix this
issue? Am I in the wrong direction?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #20 from Curtis Hamilton ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #19)
> People build the gofrontend all the time on GNU/Linux systems. I don't know
> if anyone has successful built it on a FreeBSD system.
My bad! I was referr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90635
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90635
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon May 27 00:14:02 2019
New Revision: 271640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/90635
libgo: correct typo in USE_LIBFFI AM_CONDIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90635
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon May 27 00:13:52 2019
New Revision: 271639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/90635
libgo: correct typo in USE_LIBFFI AM_CONDIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon May 27 00:10:34 2019
New Revision: 271638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/90614
syscall: avoid unused parameter error if WI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon May 27 00:10:22 2019
New Revision: 271637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/90614
syscall: avoid unused parameter error if WI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90399
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #19 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
People build the gofrontend all the time on GNU/Linux systems. I don't know if
anyone has successful built it on a FreeBSD system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90636
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Try changing to the libbacktrace build directory, removing edtest.o, and
running "make edtest". Presumably then running "./edtest" will fail with the
"missing file name or function name" error. Paste the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90407
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90381
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90639
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90639
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|Boostrap failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90639
Bug ID: 90639
Summary: Boostrap failure with recent trunk on POWER9
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #2 from Igor Smirnov ---
Strange... It came with freshiest available CentOS 7.6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
Bug ID: 90638
Summary: Wrong results of pow(complex , T1) function when
the T1 type differs from T and from int
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #18 from Curtis Hamilton ---
Created attachment 46412
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46412&action=edit
Patch to fix undefined types in sysinfo.go and runtime_sysinfo.go
This patch resolves many of the undefines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.4
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to baltic from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
>
> > I'm not sure where the repeated 72 allocations come from, and can't check
> > the code right now, but the new cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90441
--- Comment #24 from krux ---
objdump -dCrS also prints these errors.
It definitely fails to find the entry for main which is present according to
objdump --dwarf:
<1>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
DW_AT_external: 1
DW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90441
--- Comment #23 from krux ---
But it's so fragile, touch any part of the code and the error disappears.
Like change serial3_available to void and you also get an additional symbol:
4160 0003 T mainmain.cpp:8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90441
--- Comment #22 from krux ---
I can also reproduce it without any linker script, simplified code:
int serial3_available() {}
struct HardwareSerial3 {
int available() { serial3_available(); }
};
HardwareSerial3 Serial3;
void yield()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88095
Jeff Snyder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff-gcc at caffeinated dot
me.uk
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #4 from baltic <1000hz.radiowave at gmail dot com> ---
besides the 269 bytes you have mentioned, is still x10 overhead for a 20 chars
string. and massively adds up, if you store a lot objects.
for example, when i go around home folder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun May 26 14:02:51 2019
New Revision: 271630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-05-26 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/90539
* trans-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90637
Bug ID: 90637
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in vect_loop_versioning, at
tree-vect-loop-manip.c:3055
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90636
Bug ID: 90636
Summary: [libbacktrace] Tests
edtest/edtest_alloc/ttest/ttest_alloc are failing on
x64 Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90441
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
baltic <1000hz.radiowave at gmail dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90441
--- Comment #20 from krux ---
Thanks your patch worked!
Just fyi: llvm-dwarfdump doesn't understand call-site info:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41846
Not sure if it's relevant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
--- Comment #9 from krux ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #7)
> I tried current trunk (future GCC 9)
> GCC 9 learned to avoid excessive widening during vectorisation, which is
> what accounts for the large number of instructions you see.
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90605
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90628
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> Thanks for the report.
> (next time, please include a complete, compilable example, with the
> #includes, int main, etc)
Sorry, here is a complete program:-
#include
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90624
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The path type was rewritten for GCC 9, and now prints:
allocating 21 bytes
allocating 248 bytes
about to quit.
total allocated 269 bytes
freed 248 bytes
freed 21 bytes
The 21 bytes is for the native() str
39 matches
Mail list logo
