[Bug tree-optimization/87328] New: [9 Regression] ICE in do_rpo_vn, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:6566

rop -c hyr6b31a.c during GIMPLE pass: fre hyr6b31a.c: In function 'tp': hyr6b31a.c:22:1: internal compiler error: in do_rpo_vn, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:6566 22 | } | ^ 0x6a712b do_rpo_vn /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20180916/work/gcc-9-20180916/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:

[Bug c++/87327] New: Calling member functions on captured constexpr variables "is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87327 Bug ID: 87327 Summary: Calling member functions on captured constexpr variables "is not a constant expression" Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c++/87322] [GCC 8.1+] GCC fails to parse captured lambda of 2nd inner lambda if the captured lambda has "," (having 2 arguments)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87322 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87317] Missed optimisation: merging VMOVQ with operations that only use the low 8 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87317 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 44702 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44702&action=edit A patch Please try this.

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 --- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Author: hp Date: Sun Sep 16 21:23:36 2018 New Revision: 264351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264351&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85666 * config/mmix/mmix.c (mmix_assemble_int

[Bug fortran/87318] gfortran.dg/dtio_1.f90 is invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87318 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3) > > Created attachment 44700 [details] > > Revised dtio_1.f90 > > > > Will this attached version suffice? > > Looks good at

[Bug fortran/87318] gfortran.dg/dtio_1.f90 is invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87318 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3) > Created attachment 44700 [details] > Revised dtio_1.f90 > > Will this attached version suffice? Looks good at first sight. Will try ifort 19 on it soo

[Bug fortran/84543] [OOP] undefined reference to __copy_INTEGER_4_.3788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84543 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/86484] [OOP] Undefined symbol when using polymorphic intrinsic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86484 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/86484] [OOP] Undefined symbol when using polymorphic intrinsic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86484 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on 9-trunk with r264350. Closing.

[Bug fortran/87326] New: Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326 Bug ID: 87326 Summary: Support the NEW_INDEX= specifier in the FORM TEAM statement Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/37802] Improve wording for matmul bound checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/27766] [meta-bug] -fbounds-check related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766 Bug 27766 depends on bug 37802, which changed state. Bug 37802 Summary: Improve wording for matmul bound checking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/86484] [OOP] Undefined symbol when using polymorphic intrinsic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86484 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Sep 16 19:57:52 2018 New Revision: 264350 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264350&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fix PR 86484 and PR 84543 2018-09-16 Janus Weil PR

[Bug fortran/84543] [OOP] undefined reference to __copy_INTEGER_4_.3788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84543 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Sep 16 19:57:52 2018 New Revision: 264350 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264350&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fix PR 86484 and PR 84543 2018-09-16 Janus Weil PR

[Bug fortran/84543] [OOP] undefined reference to __copy_INTEGER_4_.3788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84543 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure Statu

[Bug fortran/86484] [OOP] Undefined symbol when using polymorphic intrinsic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86484 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug fortran/37802] Improve wording for matmul bound checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 16 19:37:44 2018 New Revision: 264349 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264349&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-16 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/37802 * frontend

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #51 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- There are few things still that don't work: 1. C++ does not work 2. Locations within strings expanded from a macro 3. Location within strings from a const char array. void foo(void) { #define c

[Bug c/85948] printf format attribute warning line carat inaccurate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85948 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62181] [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com

[Bug c++/78679] Produce a warning on `int + string literal`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78679 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/62181] [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||veksler at il dot ibm.com --- Comm

[Bug c++/49481] Warn about string literal + character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49481 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/43789] warn about pointer arithmetic in sizeof (Wsizeof-array-decay)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43789 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug middle-end/78081] -Wmaybe-initialized false-alarm regression for Emacs regex.c (jump threading fallout)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78081 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-04-28 00:00:00 |2018-9-16 CC|

[Bug middle-end/78915] missing -Wuninitialized accessing allocated memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78915 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/63418] false positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63418 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 63418, which changed state. Bug 63418 Summary: false positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63418 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/49754] Wuninitialized does not work with structs/unions/arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at use dot net --- Comment #7

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 42561, which changed state. Bug 42561 Summary: missing uninitialized variable warning on simple arrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42561 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42561] missing uninitialized variable warning on simple arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42561 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- Trunk doesn't show the warning (gcc-8 does).

[Bug middle-end/34515] -Wstrict-overflow produces extra warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34515 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/33933] "error: array type has incomplete element type" in system header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33933 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/26492] -Wstrict-aliasing=2 warns about explicitly allowed cast to pointer to union.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26492 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i486-linux-gnu | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 --- Comment #9 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8) > Try marking it up with __attribute__((returns_nonnull)) and/or > __attribute__((nonnull)). If the first one works, then it's a case where GCC > should suggest it,

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44701 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44701&action=edit A fix for the PR This regtests OK. It needs one or two further tweaks before submission, which will occur tomorr

[Bug middle-end/87325] New: determine_base_object does not consider consider address space of base expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87325 Bug ID: 87325 Summary: determine_base_object does not consider consider address space of base expr Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug fortran/86551] [OOP] ICE on invalid code with select type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86551 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment #3 shows lots of regressions in the testsuite, but this one should be better: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index 85247dd8334..6cf816be511 100644 ---

[Bug fortran/86470] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- On current trunk I get the following backtrace: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xc71fdf crash_signal /home/jweil/github/gcc/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:325 0x948110 contains_struct_che

[Bug fortran/86470] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #64 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- FYI, I am setting up a PowerPCSPE porterbox the next days and hope to get it added to the gcc compile farm as a test machine. So any patches can be tested there.

[Bug c++/87093] is_constructible (__is_constructible() instrinsic) explicitly instantiates conversion member function of source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87093 --- Comment #8 from Tony E Lewis --- Yep - verified on the GCC trunk on Godbolt ("9.0.0 20180915 (experimental)"). Fantastic stuff. Thanks very much Ville.