https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87318
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3) > Created attachment 44700 [details] > Revised dtio_1.f90 > > Will this attached version suffice? Looks good at first sight. Will try ifort 19 on it soon, in order to see if it runs as expected. Do you think it's feasible to add some sort of diagnostics for this problem? Or should we rather follow ifort's approach and enforce this restriction without diagnostic messages? That would probably require a wrapper around the DTIO procedures that would enforce the restrictions, right?
