https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86972
Bug ID: 86972
Summary: Incorrect array-bounds warning with -O2 when creating
pointer from array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86971
Bug ID: 86971
Summary: -Wabi warns it will not warn about anything.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
Bug ID: 86970
Summary: Rejected constexpr expression involving lambdas and
inheritance, "use of this in a constant expression"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83428
Aliaksei Kandratsenka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alkondratenko at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86969
Bug ID: 86969
Summary: [Regression] ICE (in tsubst_copy) for a generic
recursive lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unaligned big-endian access |Unaligned big-endian
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
--- Comment #1 from Sven ---
Created attachment 44548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44548&action=edit
the generated assembler code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
Bug ID: 86968
Summary: Unaligned big-endian access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb
instructions rather than ldr+rev
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85367
Yibiao Yang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86961
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Reshetnikov ---
Might be related to Bug 86956 and Bug 86959.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Reshetnikov ---
Also, might be related to Bug 84796 and Bug 86961.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Reshetnikov ---
Also, might be related to Bug 84796.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86967
Bug ID: 86967
Summary: time_get fails to parse abbreviated weekday with %A
format string
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83428
Matt Morehouse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mascasa at google dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80076
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86941
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86945
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #3)
> Self contained alternative testcase:
> With -Og, -O1 and higher:
>
> id= 1
> ierr1, OK =0 T
> ierr2, OK =1 F
The magic opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Reshetnikov ---
Might be related to Bug 86960 and Bug 86918.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
The issue occurs due to a stray carriage return aka '\r' aka ^M, occurring
towards the end of line 35 of attachment 38289 - but not at the end itself.
This carriage return confuses our line numbering.
When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Issues is that there's a param with DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P which is
> addressable. We can probably skip these, but I'm curious Eric how that
> changed in your commit?
It's a new object, i.e. a PARM_DECL wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Reshetnikov ---
I believe the code is valid. We explicitly specialize the member class template
X of S for S<> (i.e. the parameter pack T is empty). T is expanded into a list
of zero non-type template parameters of S<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966
Bug ID: 86966
Summary: ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit
specialization of a member class template
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67012
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from David Malco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86965
Bug ID: 86965
Summary: nios2 optimizer forgets about known upper bits of
register
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412
--- Comment #6 from Jason Duerstock ---
The fix for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85354 wouldn't happen
to have caused this, would it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519
--- Comment #17 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the patch has been committed as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=263563
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 15 15:25:46 2018
New Revision: 263561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71625 - missing strlen optimization on different arr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86964
Bug ID: 86964
Summary: Too many debug symbols included, especially for extern
globals
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86957
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86963
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think we want a similar solution as for PR 86751 i.e. r263185
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86963
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Wed Aug 15 11:45:44 2018
New Revision: 263556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263556&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't make unsized objects into extern.
2018-08-15 Iain Sandoe
gcc/c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86963
Bug ID: 86963
Summary: std::tuple incorrectly assigned
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86872
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00866.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84908
--- Comment #14 from Jason Vas Dias ---
RE: Comment #13:
> You said that Andi Kleen had a comment. Can you point me to it?
Here is a quote, from LKML message :
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc5 2/2] x86/vdso: \
VDSO should handle clock_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86412
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86856
--- Comment #10 from jon_y ---
I noticed there are some casting from gcall to gimple, not being familiar with
gcc internals, is it the correct way to suppress the warnings?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86777
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I don't think you could do that through the API provided by this patch set; but
it's not really appropriate for this case.
I'm not familiar with the bfin architecture so cannot comment on what the best
ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83196
--- Comment #5 from Arjen Markus ---
(In reply to Arjen Markus from comment #4)
> Created attachment 44543 [details]
> Sample module exhibiting the problem
>
> ICE at line 11329 - any reduction seems to make the problem go away (but
> also the f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83196
Arjen Markus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arjen.markus895 at gmail dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931
Arjen Markus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arjen.markus895 at gmail dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962
Bug ID: 86962
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in
sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173
with nested functions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Wed Aug 15 09:19:39 2018
New Revision: 263553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Update Darwin section names for DWARF5
gcc/
2018-08-15 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86925
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86925
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Aug 15 08:55:15 2018
New Revision: 263552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263552&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix merging of 2 predictors (PR tree-optimization/86925).
2018-08-15 Mar
57 matches
Mail list logo