https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81682
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84441
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 04:22:24 2018
New Revision: 258027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258027&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84520 - ICE with generic lambda in NSDMI.
* lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84441
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 04:22:31 2018
New Revision: 258028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84441 - ICE with base initialized from ?:
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84441
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 02:47:31 2018
New Revision: 258025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84441 - ICE with base initialized from ?:
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 02:47:25 2018
New Revision: 258024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84520 - ICE with generic lambda in NSDMI.
* lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 02:45:56 2018
New Revision: 258023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84560 - ICE capturing multi-dimensional VLA.
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84441
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 02:45:12 2018
New Revision: 258022
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258022&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84441 - ICE with base initialized from ?:
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 27 02:44:26 2018
New Revision: 258021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84520 - ICE with generic lambda in NSDMI.
* lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84581
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84581
Bug ID: 84581
Summary: GCC expects "override" keyword in incorrect grammar
position
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84580
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I assume all the Debug Mode containers have the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84580
Bug ID: 84580
Summary: Equality and relational ops for containers behave
differently in Debug Mode
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
--- Comment #2 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
Summary (from the mailing list):
Pros of the proposed approach:
1. Ability to use guaranteed lock-free double-width atomics (when mcx16 is
specified for x86-64, and always for arm64) in more or less portab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
Bug ID: 84579
Summary: __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with
-fno-lto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84441
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578
Bug ID: 84578
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with flexible array member and
constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
--- Comment #4 from Carl Love ---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-neg-longlong.p8.c
during RTL pass: vregs
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-neg-longlong.p9.c
during RTL pass: vregs
Both tests fixed with mainline commi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 26 21:55:41 2018
New Revision: 258015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84559 - ICE with constexpr VLA.
* constexpr.c (ens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 26 21:52:39 2018
New Revision: 258014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84558
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_vec_init_1): For reus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84553
--- Comment #4 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #2)
> rdynamic is a linker option that the compiler ignores, except to pass on to
> the linker. As far as the compiler knows, you are building a non-pic
> application, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84553
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 43514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43514&action=edit
untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84553
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84557
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 26 20:06:40 2018
New Revision: 258012
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258012&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-02-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84540
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84557
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 26 19:51:05 2018
New Revision: 258011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84557
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_var_list_no_open):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84541
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt ---
Paolo, you're right. Sorry for the noise.
The "-fconcept" parameter is a left-over from the larger testcase where this
snippet was derived from.
The ICE can be reproduced with GCC 4.9.0 and only needs "-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Bug ID: 84577
Summary: snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return
value is in a known range
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 26 19:46:34 2018
New Revision: 258010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258010&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/83917
* config/i386/i386-asm.h (PACKAGE_VERSION,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 84551, which changed state.
Bug 84551 Summary: [8 Regression] [concepts] Compiler options "-O -g" cause
valid code to be rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 26 19:04:42 2018
New Revision: 258009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258009&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84551 - ICE with concepts and -g.
* parser.c (add_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576
Bug ID: 84576
Summary: g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(program cc1plus)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 26 18:41:56 2018
New Revision: 258008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84325
* tree.c (replace_placeholders_r): Only ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84575
Bug ID: 84575
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c fail
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #14)
> I wonder if this could be addressed with a more reasonable address
> computation reassociation.
> ISTM that we associating as (x + (y + c)) which seems like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84574
Bug ID: 84574
Summary: Function return thunks shouldn't be aliased to
indirect branch thunks
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84447
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #13)
Ah, right. It's not skipping over debug statements. That's easier to fix than
pr84561. This should do it:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
--- Comment #3 from Carl Love ---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/sse2-pmuludq-1.c
Test requres Power 8 as a minimum. Compiling with -mcpu=power7 generates an
ICE but the test requires Power8. So the ICE shouldn't be an issue under
normal tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Feb 26 17:09:34 2018
New Revision: 258004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84532 prevent unwrapping of reference_wrapper arguments
Bac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84561
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84447
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 26 17:06:07 2018
New Revision: 258003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84447 - ICE with deleted inherited ctor with default arg.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81589
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 26 17:06:02 2018
New Revision: 258002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81589 - error with is_trivially_constructible
* g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84553
James Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84039
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 26 17:00:46 2018
New Revision: 258001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Add TARGET_INDIRECT_BRANCH_REGISTER
For
---
struct C {
vi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 43513
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43513&action=edit
Reduced translation unit.
Bisecting the reduced translation unit points to r231952 (gcc 6.0.0) as the
revision t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #37 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> Propchange: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180226-1.c
> ('svn:special' added)
This is a symlink to /home/eric/build/gcc/mips-linux/pr83496.c which
does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84573
Bug ID: 84573
Summary: missing warning on an uninstantiated function template
returning T with no return statement
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ed_notes): Rename REDUNDANT_INSN to OTHER_INSN.
Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180226-1.c
- copied unchanged from r257998,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180226-1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-7-br
ed_notes): Rename REDUNDANT_INSN to OTHER_INSN.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180226-1.c (with props)
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/reorg.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Propchange: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84176
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 84176, which changed state.
Bug 84176 Summary: Need a different thunk for -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern
-fcf-protection -mcet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84176
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84072
Bug 84072 depends on bug 84176, which changed state.
Bug 84176 Summary: Need a different thunk for -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern
-fcf-protection -mcet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84176
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Feb 26 16:17:00 2018
New Revision: 257995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make fix for PR 83965 handle SLP reduction chains
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84447
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> What are the "acats tests without -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition still at
> 314 failures." failures? Runtime failures, or just failing to assemble or
> failing to link? How do non-ada tests with -freo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
It might still be invalid, though, in which case it wouldn't make sense for
this to be P1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
If I tweak the testcase like this:
struct seconds { int i_{0}; constexpr seconds (int) {} };
template constexpr seconds operator""_s() {
return seconds(0);
}
constexpr seconds operator""_s(long double i)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84296
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:40:18 2018
New Revision: 257993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/84545
* final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Also l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43512
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43512&action=edit
gcc8-pr84565.patch
This works for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The aarch64_cmpeqdf instruction no longer matches, because the CONST0_RTX
(DFmode) operand doesn't match the aarch64_simd_reg_or_zero predicate.
Either aarch64_simd_reg_or_zero predicate should use
aarch64_si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Is it guaranteed that no target puts calls into delay slots?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84530
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:29:30 2018
New Revision: 257992
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257992&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Update -mfunction-return= for return with pop
When -mfunctio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Do the:
> if (CALL_P (insn))
> {
> rtx note = find_reg_note (insn, REG_CALL_ARG_LOCATION, NULL_RTX);
> if (note)
> remove_note (insn, note);
> }
> also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
--- Comment #1 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
See also discussion in the gcc mailing list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:00:44 2018
New Revision: 257991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-02-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84533
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Do the:
if (CALL_P (insn))
{
rtx note = find_reg_note (insn, REG_CALL_ARG_LOCATION, NULL_RTX);
if (note)
remove_note (insn, note);
}
also for insns inside
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #22 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
...
> Isn't that
> an old data file you forgot to remove?
I'll rebuild all and 'll report
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
