https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > What are the "acats tests without -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition still at > 314 failures." failures? Runtime failures, or just failing to assemble or > failing to link? How do non-ada tests with -freorder-blocks-and-partition > look on this target? Perhaps block & partition reordering needs to be > disabled, either on the target for all compilation, or for Ada only, though > of course it would be nice to see why. Is that a regression though? -freorder-blocks-and-partition is just incompatible with SEH at the moment and, since it's now the default, the end result is obviously a regression. I have the beginning of a fix but it's still not sufficient.
