[Bug debug/84300] ICE in dwarf2cfi on ppc64le with -fsplit-stack -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/84300] ICE in dwarf2cfi on ppc64le with -fsplit-stack -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84300 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sat Feb 10 04:49:15 2018 New Revision: 257549 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257549&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR84300, ICE in dwarf2cfi on ppc64le with -fsplit-stack -fno-omit-frame-poin

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #13 from mecej4 --- Thanks for locating the relevant clauses. With your extracts serving as a roadmap, I can find essentially the same wording in F2003, but with different numbers for rules and constraints, in section 12.4. R1217 fun

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:15:00PM +, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote: > > > > I cannot find a prohibition in F2018 standard. > > AFAICT, gfortran always supported keywords, and > > I've developed a patch

[Bug c/84240] Error in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84240 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/84279] [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE on cvc4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/84318] [6/7/8 Regression] attribute deprecated on function templates different than class templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Component|debug

[Bug debug/84318] New: attribute deprecated on function templates different than class templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318 Bug ID: 84318 Summary: attribute deprecated on function templates different than class templates Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/83987] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with OpenMP, sanitizer and virtual bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 9 23:22:43 2018 New Revision: 257545 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257545&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/83987 * omp-low.c (maybe_remove_omp_member_ac

[Bug rtl-optimization/84308] [7/8 Regression] Memory leak in spread_components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 9 23:21:35 2018 New Revision: 257544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257544&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84308 * shrink-wrap.c (spread_componen

[Bug c++/83372] Compiler segfaults building Mir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372 --- Comment #14 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 43389 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43389&action=edit The slightly tweaked version of the source with which I can reproduce this I was able to reliably reproduce wi

[Bug c++/83372] Compiler segfaults building Mir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #12) > Turning the cgraphunit.c:493 > gcc_collect (); > into > selftest::forcibly_ggc_collect (); > and removing the: > --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-

[Bug target/84279] [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE on cvc4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2018-02-08 00:00:

[Bug middle-end/70831] [6/7/8 Regression] FTBFS: Build fails with bootstrap-lto and profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70831 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to seurer from comment #16) > gimple folding of rs6000 builtins has been disabled. > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr83926.c (test for excess errors) > > This happens on all the testers both BE and LE.

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Feb 9 22:03:43 2018 New Revision: 257543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257543&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/83926 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr83926.c: Filter

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- The problem goes away even in the original unmodified dcp.ii with -msse2 -mfpmath=sse or with -ffloat-store, which means most likely the source just relies on excess precision not happening. If so, this is a

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:15:00PM +, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote: > --- Comment #10 from mecej4 --- > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:52:03PM +, mecej4 at

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Adding __attribute__((optimize (0))) to DCPProfile::apply also does help, which means the problem is likely in that method or something that is inline into it.

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 --- Comment #10 from Flössie --- > Have you tried -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=undefined on the code? Not yet on i686 with 7.3. We run RT occasionally with sanitizers when there are hard to debug problems, but I must admit, not yet on this very

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Leaving -ftree-vectorize out doesn't help either, -fno-inline helps though.

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Commenting out the OpenMP pragmas and/or leaving out -fopenmp for dcp.ii doesn't help either.

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #10 from mecej4 --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:52:03PM +, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote: > > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7) > > > ... > > > w = qofs(i = i, s = hh) > >

[Bug c++/81917] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 9 21:01:49 2018 New Revision: 257542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81917 - ICE with void_t and partial specialization.

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Removing the 4 __builtin_expect uses doesn't help either though. --- dcp.ii 2018-02-09 21:21:16.675015748 +0100 +++ dcp.ii 2018-02-09 21:38:18.795348083 +0100 @@ -284532,7 +284532,7 @@ void wavelet

[Bug target/84077] [7/8 Regression] Likely wrong code with `__builtin_expect()` on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/54223] Statement function statement with dummy arguments that are also OPTIONAL may crash in wrong calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c/84293] system-header macro expansion location gives unexpected warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84293 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84266] mmintrin.h intrinsic headers for PowerPC code fails on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/84293] system-header macro expansion location gives unexpected warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84293 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Feb 9 19:31:10 2018 New Revision: 257539 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257539&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c/84293] Unexpected strict-alias warning https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug c++/84283] [8 Regression] std::map::insert(const_iterator, P&&) now ambiguous with std::map::insert(InputIterator, InputIterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84283 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84296] [8 Regression] ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84296 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/81917] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/84296] [8 Regression] ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84296 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84296] [8 Regression] ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84296 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 9 19:10:42 2018 New Revision: 257538 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257538&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/84296 - ICE with qualified-id in template. PR c++/

[Bug c++/83714] [8 Regression] ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 9 19:10:42 2018 New Revision: 257538 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257538&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/84296 - ICE with qualified-id in template. PR c++/

[Bug debug/84317] [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_source_line)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug debug/84317] New: [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_source_line)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317 Bug ID: 84317 Summary: [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_source_line) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/84296] [8 Regression] ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84296 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- *** Bug 84314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/84314] [8 Regression] Another ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84316] missing -Wnull-dereference on a variable null array reference with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84316 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Summary|-Wnull-dere

[Bug target/84266] mmintrin.h intrinsic headers for PowerPC code fails on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266 --- Comment #7 from Steven Munroe --- Created attachment 43388 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43388&action=edit correct mmintrin.h for power9 2018-02-09 Steven Munroe * config/rs6000/mmintrin.h (_mm_cmpeq_pi32 [

[Bug target/84226] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1974 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84226 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84309] [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > Isn't this just an invalid test? I mean, when working with floating point, > > especially when using -ffast-math,

[Bug tree-optimization/84315] missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > Aww rats, I forgot about -Wnull-dereference. > > It's really unfortunate that -Wnull-dereference is disabled by default. Maybe that's a decision worth revisitin

[Bug rtl-optimization/57193] [6/7/8 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for SSE registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193 --- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Feb 9 18:23:58 2018 New Revision: 257537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-09 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/57193

[Bug middle-end/84309] [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/84226] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1974 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84226 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 9 18:19:08 2018 New Revision: 257536 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257536&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/84226 * config/rs6000/vsx.md (p9_xxbrq_v16qi): C

[Bug lto/84316] New: -Wnull-dereference doesn't work with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84316 Bug ID: 84316 Summary: -Wnull-dereference doesn't work with LTO Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug middle-end/84309] [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84315] missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84212] -Wno-* does not disable warnings from -flto link stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84212 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84212] -Wno-* does not disable warnings from -flto link stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84212 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Feb 9 17:58:54 2018 New Revision: 257534 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257534&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/84212 - -Wno-* does not disable warnings from -flto link stage gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/84315] missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/84315] missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/84315] New: missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315 Bug ID: 84315 Summary: missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/84295] [7 Regression] glibc failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kre

[Bug target/84295] [7 Regression] glibc failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84298] Shared TYPE_SIZE_UNIT ends up with freed SSA names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84298 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The fix is to place a DECL_EXPR somewhere by the FE. We have some duplicates > with similar issues. Should c_fully_fold_internal the

[Bug target/84301] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov --- Moreover, without --param selsched-max-lookahead=2 sel-sched moves both the assignment and use into middle of BB 2, breaking the assumption in mode-switching that retval use is the last insn: 249

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84309] [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Feb 9 16:32:37 2018 New Revision: 257531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/83926 * config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_mul_v2

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #18 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- Excellent, thank you for the feedback!

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor --- Yes, 521.wrf_r indeed now builds fine with LTO. Thanks everyone for a quick fix.

[Bug c++/83372] Compiler segfaults building Mir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/83372] Compiler segfaults building Mir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- Looks like a GC issue; I was able to reproduce it, albeit *very* slowly, via: --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0 on a slightly hacked up version of attachment 42843. /builddir/build/BUILD

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:52:03PM +, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote: > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7) > > Ugh. Statement functions should be removed from the Standard. > > The simply fix, of c

[Bug c++/84311] compiler accepts invalid multiple type-specifiers in a decl-specifier-seq for an enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84311 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNC

[Bug target/83307] Miscompilation of range_for with initializer_list in constructors on MacOS (works on Linux)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83307 --- Comment #1 from Chris Green --- Verified as continuing to fail on MacOS High Sierra (XCode 9.2 / 9C40b) with GCC 7.3.0 from homebrew with -DTRY=0 and -DTRY=1.

[Bug fortran/84313] New: [F08] reject procedure pointers in COMMON blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84313 Bug ID: 84313 Summary: [F08] reject procedure pointers in COMMON blocks Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug c++/84314] [8 Regression] Another ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84314] New: [8 Regression] Another ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314 Bug ID: 84314 Summary: [8 Regression] Another ICE in finish_member_declaration Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug sanitizer/83987] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with OpenMP, sanitizer and virtual bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43386 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43386&action=edit gcc8-pr83987.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/84312] New: Variadic function without named argument not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84312 Bug ID: 84312 Summary: Variadic function without named argument not inlined Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/84311] New: compiler accepts invalid multiple type-specifiers in a decl-specifier-seq for an enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84311 Bug ID: 84311 Summary: compiler accepts invalid multiple type-specifiers in a decl-specifier-seq for an enum Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c/84310] -falign-{labels,loops,jumps} with value >= 32768+1 cause a segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- It should also be a power of 2, shouldn't it? Aligning anything to 4097 bytes is just weird.

[Bug target/84272] [8 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free ../../gcc/config/aarch64/cortex-a57-fma-steering.c:519 in fma_node::get_parity()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Created attachment 43384 [details] > gcc8-pr84272.patch > > So like this? A few additional changes, Florian Weimer suggested using > preincrement

[Bug c++/84282] [8 Regression] Probably rejected valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (same as PR 84012)

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #15 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pmderodat Date: Fri Feb 9 14:02:37 2018 New Revision: 257526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257526&root=gcc&view=rev Log: DWARF: no location for non-definition DECLs with non-tr

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 mecej4 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mecej4 at outlook dot com --- Comment #8 from m

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to amker from comment #26) > (In reply to amker from comment #25) > > I tend to believe this is an register pressure based strength-reduction + > > lim problem than ivopts. > > > > So given class

[Bug target/84310] -falign-{labels,loops,jumps} with value >= 32768+1 cause a segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84310] New: -falign-{labels,loops,jumps} with value >= 32768+1 cause a segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310 Bug ID: 84310 Summary: -falign-{labels,loops,jumps} with value >= 32768+1 cause a segfault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-va

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #14 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- (In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #13) > IIRC, DECL_VALUE_EXPR is something like MEM_REF (-1). Yes, I’ll give it a > try… I submitted a candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc

[Bug inline-asm/66631] inability to clobber segment regs makes tls problematic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66631 Stas Sergeev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65674] stack smashing protector must be controllable per-function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65674 Stas Sergeev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84281] Heap grows indefinitely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/84272] [8 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free ../../gcc/config/aarch64/cortex-a57-fma-steering.c:519 in fma_node::get_parity()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Created attachment 43384 [details] > gcc8-pr84272.patch > > So like this? A few additional changes, Florian Weimer suggested using > preincrement instead

[Bug middle-end/84309] [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/84309] [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r251230.

[Bug middle-end/84309] New: [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309 Bug ID: 84309 Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-e

[Bug rtl-optimization/84308] [7/8 Regression] Memory leak in spread_components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43385 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43385&action=edit gcc8-pr84308.patch Untested fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84308] New: [7/8 Regression] Memory leak in spread_components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308 Bug ID: 84308 Summary: [7/8 Regression] Memory leak in spread_components Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/84307] asan blocks dead-store elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/84307] New: asan blocks dead-store elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307 Bug ID: 84307 Summary: asan blocks dead-store elimination Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

  1   2   >