https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme <thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Created attachment 43384 [details] > gcc8-pr84272.patch > > So like this? A few additional changes, Florian Weimer suggested using > preincrement instead of postincrement with the C++ iterators, and I hope > there are no pointers in between different forest, so it should be fine to > free already when processing of the forest is done, rather than waiting > until all forests are processed. > > Could somebody test it on aarch64-linux please? Yes I think it should be fine. Sorry, got to head back home again but Kyrill said he would be testing it.
