https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81776
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
As a data point, Clang manages to optimize at least the simple case in bug
81788 as expected. No other compiler I've tested does (IBM XLC, Intel ICC,
Visual Studio, or Sun/Oracle Studio).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81788
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81789
Bug ID: 81789
Summary: CWG1687 performed too soon
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81687
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Aug 10 00:33:20 2017
New Revision: 251019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81687
* omp-low.c (omp_copy_decl): Don't remap FORCED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81788
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Dup of bug 23384 I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81788
Bug ID: 81788
Summary: address of a local variable escapes too early
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.4.2
Summary|__basic_file:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81643
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk for rs6000; backports pending.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79391
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill ---
It builds on the gcc head and the 7 branch now.
Should we just go ahead and close this or does it matter when it was fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:52:30 2017
New Revision: 251011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
This time with the file added.
Testcase for PR81423
gcc/testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81787
Bug ID: 81787
Summary: `#pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-fpermissive"` no
longer works since gcc 4.8
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:08:33 2017
New Revision: 251005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251005&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Use SAVE_MULTIPLE only if we restore what it saves (PR80938)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Aug 9 21:05:45 2017
New Revision: 251004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Testcase for PR81423
gcc/testsuite/
PR rtl-optimization/814
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Confirmed, started with r250048.
Still going wrong, nearly a month later.
Revision 250983 seems to demonstrate the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> Modified:
> branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
Reverted for now, as 7.2 is frozen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81786
Bug ID: 81786
Summary: local restricted pointer can be relied on in alias
analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 20:17:55 2017
New Revision: 251001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81525 - wrong constant value with generic lambda
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67054
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 20:17:47 2017
New Revision: 251000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67054 - Inherited ctor with non-default-constructible membe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81398
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #7 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67586
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78860
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64546
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 19:21:49 2017
New Revision: 250999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81525 - wrong constant value with generic lambda
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67586
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68834
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Mike Lothian from comment #12)
> Created attachment 41960 [details]
> si_shader objdumps
We need a small testcase in C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81785
Bug ID: 81785
Summary: Segmentation fault for signed overflow in index
expression when -fwrapv is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 9 18:32:02 2017
New Revision: 250994
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250994&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81359 - Unparsed NSDMI error from SFINAE context.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67694
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 9 17:52:10 2017
New Revision: 250993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81751 don't call fflush(NULL)
PR libstdc++/79820
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 9 17:52:10 2017
New Revision: 250993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81751 don't call fflush(NULL)
PR libstdc++/79820
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 80503 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80503
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
--- Comment #12 from Mike Lothian ---
Created attachment 41960
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41960&action=edit
si_shader objdumps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
--- Comment #11 from Mike Lothian ---
So a lot of the segfaults I see are in si_shader so I thought I'd compile Mesa
with and without BMI and compare the onjdumps of the two .o files
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -pipe -mno-bmi -m32" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81753
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
No, it doesn't. It only made it possible to call the builtin from the
frontend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or just call fflush(__file) directly:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00673.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81778
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81767
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79565
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 41959
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41959&action=edit
A patch
I got
[hjl@gnu-6 pr79565]$ cat x.i
typedef float a __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
a b, d;
int __att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81767
Antony Polukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Bug ID: 81784
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/compare2.c fails starting with
r250984
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80503
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is this a dup of PR80618? That is fixed on all branches already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81586
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01866.html
Did this patch ever get into trunk gcc ?
I have some evidence that gcc trunk revision 250947
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
--- Comment #12 from DIL ---
Could you please tell me if there is a way I can check whether the dissociated
unlimited polymorphic pointer (class(*), pointer), which is set to NULL, is
indeed set to a clean state internally? That is, could you ple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79565
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
--- Comment #10 from Mike Lothian ---
Unfortunately it also depends on LLVM not just Mesa which makes it a much
bigger target for figuring this out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
A (potentially simpler) alternative is to use sequential builds (make without
-j) and bisect by index of compiled source file, i.e. have a wrapper script
around gcc that uses some global counter to pass -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
--- Comment #5 from Volker Wehrs ---
I'm sorry but I ignored the first if-clause in sys_open(). That if-clause makes
sure there is no open file referenced by the __basic_file, otherwise sys_open()
fails.
Then the sync() is called before the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpcspe-*-linux-gnu* |powerpcspe-*-linux-gnu*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2082
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> > I don't see this any longer.
>
> I think I might've seen this before, but I'll have to double-check the nex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79810
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80019
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 79810 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48227
--- Comment #5 from Matt Godbolt ---
Seems to have been fixed in 4.9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81782
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 41958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41958&action=edit
Minimal test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 80214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80214
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81783
Bug ID: 81783
Summary: -Wtautological-compare could do better
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2082
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11196
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21326 and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21327 for the changes to glibc
that are needed before we can change anything in GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81695
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Prado ---
Created attachment 41957
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41957&action=edit
Pre-processed file from rtcm2_json.c compiled with -E option
Here is the pre-processed file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81782
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
Summary|Yet another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81782
Bug ID: 81782
Summary: Yet another -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive with
empty array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79810
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But there is an open FILE and it might have pending writes or ungetc'd data
that should be flushed. I think that's why it's there. Consider:
FILE* f = std::fopen("81751.txt", "w+");
std::fwrite("Some w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81781
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81233
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81233
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Aug 9 11:28:22 2017
New Revision: 250985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81233
* c-typeck.c (pedwarn_init): Make the functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81750
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d25fe0be at outlook dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81780
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80503
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81780
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer ---
Could we turn calls to regparam (3) functions into noplt calls? Some
additional mechanics are probably needed if the address of such a function is
taken.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo