https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> What about the following 2 lines that still use MEM_ALIGN (reg) rather than
> MEM_ALIGN (subst)?
The mode of SUBST is MODE whereas that of REG is INNERMODE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Segfault |[6 Regression] Segfault in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346
--- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha ---
W/ gcc-7.0.0-alpha20170108 I too cannot reproduce it anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc-7.0.0-alpha20170108 snapshot and isl 0.18.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
Chung-Ju Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
--- Comment #11 from Chung-Ju Wu ---
Author: jasonwucj
Date: Tue Jan 10 04:23:35 2017
New Revision: 244258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR70668.
Backport from mainline
2016-04-28 Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
--- Comment #10 from Chung-Ju Wu ---
Author: jasonwucj
Date: Tue Jan 10 04:18:11 2017
New Revision: 244257
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244257&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR70668.
Backport from mainline
2016-04-28 Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040
Bug ID: 79040
Summary: vec_cntlz redefined
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039
Bug ID: 79039
Summary: builtins-3-p9.c fails with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40484&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
It was decided to split PR target/79004 into 2 parts. This patch fixes th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038
Bug ID: 79038
Summary: Improve PowerPC ISA 3.0 conversion between integers
and hardware _Float128
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhanc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79036
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79036
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jan 9 23:31:38 2017
New Revision: 244250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/79036 - gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c fails starting with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79024
--- Comment #7 from Xidorn Quan ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Please read 3.11 more carefully.
>
> "The alignment required for a type might be different when it is used as the
> type of a complete object and when it is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79036
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Rebuilding gcc with the following change now:
--- a/src/libgo/runtime/runtime.h.old 2016-02-12 23:10:09.0 +0100
+++ b/src/libgo/runtime/runtime.h 2017-01-10 00:12:08.404802087 +01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
Bug ID: 79037
Summary: gccgo: Binaries crash with parforsetup: pos is not
aligned on m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Jan 9 22:00:32 2017
New Revision: 244248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71017
* config/i386/cpuid.h: Fix u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 9 21:53:02 2017
New Revision: 244247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79007
PR tree-optimization/67955
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79020
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 9 21:48:33 2017
New Revision: 244245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR translation/79019
PR translation/79020
* params
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67955
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 9 21:53:02 2017
New Revision: 244247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79007
PR tree-optimization/67955
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79020
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79026
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79019
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 9 21:48:33 2017
New Revision: 244245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR translation/79019
PR translation/79020
* params
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79026
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Jan 9 21:41:02 2017
New Revision: 244244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR testsuite/79026
* g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 40483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40483&action=edit
Tentative fix
To be tested on SPARC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc |sparc-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479
--- Comment #20 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: seurer
Date: Mon Jan 9 20:45:59 2017
New Revision: 244241
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-09 Bill Seurer
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
The Fortran part is now fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
--- Comment #15 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Jan 9 20:29:06 2017
New Revision: 244239
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/60670
* Makefile.am: Make finclu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78942
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53993
--- Comment #2 from Manuel L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79036
Bug ID: 79036
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c fails
starting with r244037
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79033
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78899
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 9 20:10:23 2017
New Revision: 244238
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244238&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78899
* tree-if-conv.c (version_loop_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79033
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jan 9 20:08:49 2017
New Revision: 244237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/79033 - asan.c not compiling with make BOOT_CFLAGS=-O0
gcc/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
--- Comment #3 from Edward ---
Perhaps https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79035 is related
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79035
Bug ID: 79035
Summary: Rejects valid code due to failure to use user const
conversion template operator
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79033
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
I believe this is fixed but I still need to build an instrumented compiler to
verify.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:26:37 2017
New Revision: 244232
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244232&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 78365] Prudent type handling in IPA VR-prop
2017-01-09 Martin Jam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:26:37 2017
New Revision: 244232
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244232&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 78365] Prudent type handling in IPA VR-prop
2017-01-09 Martin Jamb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79034
Bug ID: 79034
Summary: ICE segfault in gcc 6.x
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The causes for both pr67073 and this one were the backend_decl of symbol to
lock/event on being created. A small patch to come will solve this shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67073
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danlnagle at me dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79033
Bug ID: 79033
Summary: asan.c not compiling with make BOOT_CFLAGS='-O0' (or
'-O1')
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is ready to be committed AFAIK; same for the related PR78727.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
That sounds good to me. Unless someone beats me to it, I can see about making
those changes in stage 4 after I'm done with all my stage 3 work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79024
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Although Bug 69763 (and https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26547 for clang)
are still open because this is inconsistent with C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032
Bug ID: 79032
Summary: Unaligned memory access in code generated for sparc 32
with LRA
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 9 16:24:19 2017
New Revision: 244228
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244228&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78948
* g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if10.C: Fix PR numbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 79029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79029
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7 regression] |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/dse-points-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jan 9 15:24:35 2017
New Revision: 244227
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244227&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not error when -E provided (PR pch/78970).
2017-01-09 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79024
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please read 3.11 more carefully.
"The alignment required for a type might be different when it is used as the
type of a complete object and when it is used as the type of a subobject. [...]
The result of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79031
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
--- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha ---
AFAICT, the patch was ACKed by Segher on December 15th
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01337.html). Is there something
that still prevents it from being committed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40481
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40481&action=edit
Untested patch for the new issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 9 13:05:58 2017
New Revision: 244225
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244225&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR66414 optimize std::string::find
2017-01-09 Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79027
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Doesn't occur with --enable-checking=release.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79027
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2017-01-09, at 4:09 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79027
>
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> Is this stage2 or stage3? To me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79031
Bug ID: 79031
Summary: [C++17] ICE with class template deduction for
std::vector and std::initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79030
--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Created attachment 40480
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40480&action=edit
Testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79030
Bug ID: 79030
Summary: Compilation failure due to virtual memory exhaustion
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 9 11:44:52 2017
New Revision: 244223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244223&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78938
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #27 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #26)
> I can reproduce the problem with this new reduced testcase. I don't have
> knowledge of all of the details how the gcc implementation of LTO works, but
> my un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79029
Bug ID: 79029
Summary: [7 Regression] UB in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:582:17:
runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot
be represented in type 'long int';
Product: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
> This change causes a regression testing glibc. glibc uses "gcc -E -x
> c-header -", which now results in an error "cannot use '-' as input
> filename
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #14 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Mon Jan 9 09:58:54 2017
New Revision: 244220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE
gcc/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79027
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Is this stage2 or stage3? To me it looks like a miscompile of GCC ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69539
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think this ought to be fixed by r243514, i.e. PR78708.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The pt_null thing for sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79014
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79015
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Just to document, I see another Werror in LTO bootstrap:
>
> ../../gcc/predict.c: In function ‘set_even_probabilities’:
> ../../gcc/predict.c:798:8: error: ‘e’ m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo