https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79024
--- Comment #7 from Xidorn Quan <gnu-9fbaow at upsuper dot org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Please read 3.11 more carefully. > > "The alignment required for a type might be different when it is used as the > type of a complete object and when it is used as the type of a subobject. > [...] The result of the alignof operator reflects the alignment requirement > of the type in the complete-object case." I saw that, but given the example, I thought it was only for the case of virtual base... Well...
