https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62191
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #11 from peien luo ---
Sorry for the previous comment regarding running in gdb. the result seems to be
random:
Sometimes it can runs fine
Sometimes it gets a SEGFAULT in calling to a function, gdb says:
0x7ff0fa19b466 <+22>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #10 from peien luo ---
It's a centOS7, kernel has been updated to 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64, the
problem still occurs. Some new findings:
1, With gcc 4.8.5, it runs fine for this specific case.
2, With gcc 4.9.4, it stucks at some p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78162
Bug ID: 78162
Summary: ICE on invalid code at -Os and above on
x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39923
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39923&action=edit
pr78112.ii
Reduced testcase, on x86_64-linux with -g -dA one can see on a single DIE (so
it isn't just DW_AT_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78161
Bug ID: 78161
Summary: contrib/download_prerequisites fails on MacOS,
Lubuntu, and Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77871
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78156
--- Comment #2 from Pauli ---
Maybe this isn't exactly defect. But constexpr is hard beast to get right in
any code.
For user code simplest workaround would be remembering to use operator""sv
everywhere. Too bad accessing those operator seems to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[5/6 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Oct 29 20:22:36 2016
New Revision: 241681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/77919
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1) :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78156
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78160
Bug ID: 78160
Summary: explicit template instantation with hidden symbols
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78159
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
anguages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,lto,go
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20161029 (experimental) [trunk revision 241674] (GCC)
r241609 was okay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
The proposed patch fixes all the gcov tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78148
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Oct 29 15:55:50 2016
New Revision: 241679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78148
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
(imm_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE during LTO bootstrap on |ICE during LTO bootstrap on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78148
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39921&action=edit
gcc7-pr78148.patch
Untested fix. Hopefully it will also fix the ada bootstrap failure on
x86_64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78158
Bug ID: 78158
Summary: Strange data race detection with thread sanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77948
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39920
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39920&action=edit
gcc7-pr77948-2.patch
Alternate patch. As the gcc/g++ drivers reorder options (-std=*, present
anywhere on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77948
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78154
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Funny I thought this was fixed already but I was wrong.
Anyways I had posted a patch over 4 years ago for this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00056.html
IIRC the reason why I wrote this patch
30 matches
Mail list logo