https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160822 (experimental) [trunk revision 239655] (GCC)
$
$ g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68372
--- Comment #1 from lucdanton at free dot fr ---
On 7 trunk (rev. 239680) it looks like the program now triggers an ICE:
$ g++-trunk -std=c++1z -fconcepts main.cpp
main.cpp: In substitution of 'template requires C... void
foo::bar(X ...) [with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337
Bug ID: 77337
Summary: [7 regression][c++1z] use before deduction of 'auto'
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71776
--- Comment #6 from malithyapa at gmail dot com ---
Tried with 4.9.4 in debian sid. Still the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77336
Bug ID: 77336
Summary: -Wsuggest-attribute=format warning overly simplistic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77335
Bug ID: 77335
Summary: templates and ambiguous call to overloaded function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
Bug ID: 77334
Summary: Cannot move assign std::map with non-copyable and
non-movable mapped_type
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332
Jeremy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc.hall at gmail dot com
Severity|no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
Bug ID: 77333
Summary: Incorrect stack adjust in epilogue when targeting
i686-w64-mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332
Bug ID: 77332
Summary: ICE when building gcc 6.2 (with gcc 6,1.0)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > Like I said. Works for me.
>
> How many times did you try? It worked for me the first time, but then I
> tried -mavx -m32 and got an ICE, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77329
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think this is a malloc bug: x86 malloc should produce 16-byte-aligned
results because the relevant TR / TS documents define _Decimal128 and
_Float128 in such a way that they are types for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77331
Bug ID: 77331
Summary: incorrect range location in -Wformat with a
concatenated format literal
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
Bug ID: 77330
Summary: __float128 segfaults on 32-bit x86 due to 8-byte
malloc alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77329
Bug ID: 77329
Summary: gcc doesn't always correctly calculate label addresses
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Aug 22 21:53:59 2016
New Revision: 239676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77321
* c-common.c (warn_for_memset): Check type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Like I said. Works for me.
How many times did you try? It worked for me the first time, but then I tried
-mavx -m32 and got an ICE, then I got the same ICE with -mavx only. Another
instance of non-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77316
--- Comment #4 from Roland Dreier ---
Discovered this is due to abi-compat, I think. gcc 6 works because abi-compat
went from 2 (gcc 5.4) to 8, and the significant break is 6 -> 7:
$ g++ -Wabi=6 --std=c++11 -c b.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77328
Bug ID: 77328
Summary: incorrect caret location in -Wformat calling printf
via a macro
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
Bug ID: 77327
Summary: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free
gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/interface.c:403 in
compare_components
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #2 from Wenzel Jakob ---
+1 this looks great!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72867
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72867
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:42:03 2016
New Revision: 239674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-08-15 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72856
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> AFAIU this occurs for platforms without real(10) and is due to the fact that
> the sequence for real(16) is different from the sequence for other reals.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76342
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76342
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 22 18:57:37 2016
New Revision: 239669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-08-14 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 22 18:57:37 2016
New Revision: 239669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-08-14 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326
--- Comment #1 from Matthijs Kooijman ---
The original reporter just added a comment that this does not occur anymore in
gcc 6.1.0, though I haven't got anything newer than 5.1 available here to
check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326
Bug ID: 77326
Summary: [avr] Invalid optimization using varargs and a weak
function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Works for me.
You need -mavx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Looks OK to commit if you want to. I have no idea what the testcase is supposed
to mean or why the C++ frontend makes an identifier node with a NULL type, but
I assume there's a good reason.
plev.c:335
> 0x688b02 gfc_is_constant_expr(gfc_expr*)
> ../../gcc/fortran/expr.c:899
Works for me.
% gfc7 -o z a.f90
a.f90:2:46:
character(len=2, kind=1) :: a = 'aa', b = 'bb
1
Error: Unterminated character constant beginning at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77319
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61318
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77260
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Aug 22 18:23:43 2016
New Revision: 239668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-22 Steven G. Kargl
Bud Davis
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61318
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Aug 22 18:18:14 2016
New Revision: 239667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/61318
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77260
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Aug 22 18:12:33 2016
New Revision: 239666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/77260
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77269
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77269
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon Aug 22 18:03:59 2016
New Revision: 239665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support __builtin_isinf_sign for new floating-point types (PR
middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Slightly simplified, indicating an uninitialized variable :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
character(1), parameter :: c(3) = ['a', 'b', 'c']
character(:), allocatable :: z(:)
z = c(1)
print *, z
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325
Bug ID: 77325
Summary: ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1933
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Version|6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
--- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
On my environment the ICE is gone only for z1.f90 and z8.f90.
$ gfortran-7-20160821 z7.f90
z7.f90:5:20:
character x(:)
1
Error: Array component of structure at (1) must have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69859
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.0 |7.0
--- Comment #6 from Gerhard Stei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77319
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||overseers at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68225
--- Comment #6 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
ICE seems to be gone, z1 now and z2 still aborting at runtime.
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
ICE is gone for all tested constellations with
gcc-Version 7.0.0 20160821 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
ICE is completely gone for all tested constellations with
gcc-Version 7.0.0 20160821 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Aug 22 17:29:31 2016
New Revision: 239664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/68297 avoid throw/catch in make_exception_ptr
2016-08-22 Gleb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77312
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Inside a lambda where XYZ is captured? Do we need to read from the closure
> twice, once for the deconstructor and then again for the call to delete.
I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc*-*-solaris2.*
Host|
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between 20160812 and 20160822, Ada bootstrap started to fail on Solaris/SPARC,
with
ICEs in stage 2:
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Aug 22 16:47:34 2016
New Revision: 239662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add noexcept to std::function swap
PR libstdc++/77322
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77312
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
It all comes down to this statement:
delete this;
The C++ front-end expands it as:
[t33.cc:28:39] D.3592 = [t33.cc:28:39] __closure->__this;
[t33.cc:28:41] LambdaHolder::~LambdaHolder (D.3592);
[t33.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This has been the subject of a longstanding issue, which is only now close to
being resolved:
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2062
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77319
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Maybe CC overseers, ask for the mail settings to be restored to what they
were (sending mail in a way that bypasses spamassassin and restoring the
Bugzilla addresses to the global-allow lis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70597
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77323
Bug ID: 77323
Summary: Bad "defaults to 'int'" warning for unsupported types
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77269
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77320
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77322
Bug ID: 77322
Summary: [C++11] std::function::swap should be noexcept.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321
Bug ID: 77321
Summary: [7 Regression] crash in warn_for_memset
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57326
mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77319
--- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin ---
Is this behavior new? Because the Bugzilla code and configuration didn't change
since Aug 17.
I suspect that the anti-spam filters on the mail server are the culprit. fche
said they could take several tens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71700
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Aug 22 14:28:05 2016
New Revision: 239660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[expr.c] PR middle-end/71700: zero-extend sub-word value w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69818
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53129
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
