[Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects

2015-04-02 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libstdc++/62259] atomic class doesn't enforce required alignment on powerpc64

2015-04-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62259 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4) > Yeah... up until now, CRIS was the only port that this was an issue for. And JFTR, the resolution to this PR doesn't solve the similar issue there. (To wit

[Bug libstdc++/54005] Use __atomic_always_lock_free in libstdc++ is_lock_free instead of __atomic_is_lock_free

2015-04-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005 --- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14) > Can we close this? No. IIUC, we're still/again using __atomic_is_lock_free with alignment deduced from the current object rather than the type (even th

[Bug middle-end/65665] [5.0 Regression]: g++.dg/torture/pr64378.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

2015-04-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- The cutnpasted backtrace was from revision 221841.

[Bug middle-end/65665] New: [5.0 Regression]: g++.dg/torture/pr64378.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

2015-04-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665 Bug ID: 65665 Summary: [5.0 Regression]: g++.dg/torture/pr64378.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/53838] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and empty ostringstream

2015-04-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53838 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- i.e. do you have the exact commands to build a gcc that shows the problem? So it can be reproduced from a clean source tarball, without external dependencies.

[Bug libstdc++/53838] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and empty ostringstream

2015-04-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53838 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- One of those bugs is apparently not present in 4.2 or later, are you sure it's the same? Do you have a reproducible testcase to show the bug, not just "use macports, it breaks"? or only links to other repo

[Bug ipa/65655] [5 Regression] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Hmm it is interesting case, we try to resolve speculation while we are duplicating it. I am testing the following Index: ipa-inline-analysis.c ==

[Bug fortran/64986] class_to_type_4.f90: valgrind error: Invalid read/write of size 8

2015-04-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/65089] FAIL: gfortran.dg/io_real_boz(2|_[45]).f90 when tested with -fsanitize=address

2015-04-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/65664] ARM bootstrap fails with --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4

2015-04-02 Thread lukacs at topgroups dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65664 --- Comment #2 from Gabor Lukacs --- If --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4 is replaced with --with-fpu=vfpv4 then bootstrap works fine.

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #54 from Jan Hubicka --- I have full set of firefox talos benchmarks with inline-unit-growth bumped back to 30 (I did not test default value by accident, but I am running itnow). We now get back the GCC 4.9 performance on dromaeo_dom/

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- Rainer, the compiled code (test.s) is identical to what LTO path produces, so I am convinced this is a bug at binutils side. Would you please mind filling up the PR? There are two issues at least - first is

[Bug libstdc++/53838] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and empty ostringstream

2015-04-02 Thread tom at kera dot name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53838 Tomalak Geret'kal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at kera dot name --- Comment #6

[Bug target/56726] i386: MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is too small (usually)

2015-04-02 Thread chip at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726 --- Comment #11 from Chip Salzenberg --- Indeed, 16 is required by the ABI; see http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf page 12. Only the SIMD __m256 is bigger than 16, and there seems no end to Intel's extensions to SIMD registers, so holdi

[Bug libstdc++/65663] libstdc++: writing mixed-size blocks through an std::ofstream to a SMB 2.1 share produces file corruption

2015-04-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65663 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65644] Assembler errors on Solaris 10 x86-64: `(%eXX)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression

2015-04-02 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. --- My admin installed 119961-13, which is the current version of 119961-11: $ /usr/ccs/bin/as -V as: SunOS 5.10 119961-13 Patch 08/06/2014 Usage: as [-a32] [-m] [-m32] [-m64] [-n] [...] I'

[Bug bootstrap/65664] ARM bootstrap fails with --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4

2015-04-02 Thread lukacs at topgroups dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65664 --- Comment #1 from Gabor Lukacs --- Created attachment 35220 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35220&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug bootstrap/65664] New: ARM bootstrap fails with --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4

2015-04-02 Thread lukacs at topgroups dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65664 Bug ID: 65664 Summary: ARM bootstrap fails with --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bo

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

2015-04-02 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 35218 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35218&action=edit Test case compiled without -flto. This without -flto. By the way ld is: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.25.51.2015032

[Bug c++/65642] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects valid constant expression

2015-04-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 2 16:51:27 2015 New Revision: 221843 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221843&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65642 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_pointer_plus_expression):

[Bug c++/65625] [5 Regression] ICE in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3499

2015-04-02 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65625 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65625] [5 Regression] ICE in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3499

2015-04-02 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65625 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 2 16:43:02 2015 New Revision: 221842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221842&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65625 * decl.c (make_typename_type): Handle seeing a variab

[Bug ipa/65540] [5 Regression] internal error on s-fatllf.ads at -O2

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65540 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg3.html

[Bug ipa/65654] [5 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Thanks! The resolution file is wrong: 1 test.o 1 172 795d441a PREEMPTED_REG main the resolution of main() should be PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY. PREEMTED_REG is defined as follows: PREEMPTED_REG (this definition wa

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 --- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany --- AArch64 is being discussed at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/address-sanitizer/YzYRJEvVimw Please join the discussion. We, the primary maintainers of asan, have no access to AArch64 boxes yet,

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 --- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany --- AArch64 is being discussed at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/address-sanitizer/YzYRJEvVimw Please join the discussion. We, the primary maintainers of asan, have no access to AArch64 boxes yet,

[Bug ipa/65655] [5 Regression] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/65663] libstdc++: writing mixed-size blocks through an std::ofstream to a SMB 2.1 share produces file corruption

2015-04-02 Thread kkananen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65663 --- Comment #1 from Kaarlo Kananen --- Created attachment 35217 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35217&action=edit Original minimal reproduction .cpp Full minimal reproduction source .cpp

[Bug libstdc++/65663] New: libstdc++: writing mixed-size blocks through an std::ofstream to a SMB 2.1 share produces file corruption

2015-04-02 Thread kkananen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65663 Bug ID: 65663 Summary: libstdc++: writing mixed-size blocks through an std::ofstream to a SMB 2.1 share produces file corruption Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug target/65647] [5 Regression] GCC won't stop when compile for armv6-m

2015-04-02 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've reproduced the problem too. Such problems needs a lot of time to analyze and fix but I hope to fix it at the beginning of next week.

[Bug c++/57712] GCC fails to to match out-of-line template member function definition with declaration

2015-04-02 Thread stanshebs at earthlink dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57712 Stan Shebs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stanshebs at earthlink dot net --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

2015-04-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35215 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35215&action=edit relevant bit of gcc.log > Next time I encounter it, I'll try to post the full FAIL message I ran int

[Bug c++/65642] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects valid constant expression

2015-04-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Created attachment 35214 [details] > pr65642.patch > > Untested patch for example 1 and 3. 1 and 2. 3 is different.

[Bug c++/65642] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects valid constant expression

2015-04-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Created attachment 35214 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35214&action=edit pr65642.patch Untested patch for example 1 and 3.

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think it was a serious mistake to officially add support for it when it only works on one of the 3 configurations. Unfortunately there has not really been any progress on this in the past 3 month since it

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > There are dups for this already. > The issue is that aarch64-linux has 3 very much different virtual address > space sizes and stock libsanitizer supports only th

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenther at suse dot de |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ta

[Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta

2015-04-02 Thread j.breitbart at tum dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620 --- Comment #4 from Jens Breitbart --- Yes, sorry, not sure how this happened.

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- There are dups for this already. The issue is that aarch64-linux has 3 very much different virtual address space sizes and stock libsanitizer supports only the smallest one. I have a patch for supporting the

[Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta

2015-04-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jens Breitbart from comment #2) > Created attachment 35213 [details] > Add _mask_range_hashing to hashtable_policy.h v1 Jens, I think you meant to attach this to PR65641, but as I said there,

[Bug libstdc++/65641] unordered_map - __detail::_Mod_range_hashing is slow

2015-04-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65641 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/65662] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug sanitizer/65662] New: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (0x3ffb49, 0x80000)

2015-04-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 Bug ID: 65662 Summary: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitize r_allocator.h:835 "((res)) < ((kNumPossibleRegions))" (

[Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta

2015-04-02 Thread j.breitbart at tum dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620 Jens Breitbart changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j.breitbart at tum dot de --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/65641] unordered_map - __detail::_Mod_range_hashing is slow

2015-04-02 Thread j.breitbart at tum dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65641 --- Comment #2 from Jens Breitbart --- Thanks for the link. I am not sure if there is really any benefit of using libdivide instead of the masking. I'll attach a first version of patch in which the functor stores the mask. Any comments welcome,

[Bug preprocessor/61977] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] powerpc preprocessor breaks on lines that end with "vector"

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Two out of the 3 patches applied to trunk, still waiting for review of the first patch.

[Bug target/65351] [5 Regression] libiberty's pic version contains non-pic code on m32 darwin; causes bootstrap fail building libcc1.

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks for fixing that thinko. Please regenerate not just libiberty/configure, but also {gcc,libada,libgcc}/configure too. The patch is ok for trunk with those changes with proper ChangeLog entry and when p

[Bug target/65660] [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00053.html C testcase: void Set (float d, float *data) { for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) data[i] = d; } note that I didn't really verify it is that specific

[Bug target/65351] [5 Regression] libiberty's pic version contains non-pic code on m32 darwin; causes bootstrap fail building libcc1.

2015-04-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35174|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug preprocessor/61977] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] powerpc preprocessor breaks on lines that end with "vector"

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Apr 2 11:57:02 2015 New Revision: 221839 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221839&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61977 * lex.c (cpp_peek_token): Temporarily clear

[Bug preprocessor/61977] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] powerpc preprocessor breaks on lines that end with "vector"

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Apr 2 11:54:58 2015 New Revision: 221838 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221838&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61977 * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (rs6000_cpu_cpp_

[Bug target/56726] i386: MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is too small (usually)

2015-04-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug middle-end/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #22) > (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #21) > > As this has been failing since GCC 4.6.3, it is not a regression and > > therefore Kyrill's fix would not be app

[Bug tree-optimization/65661] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init

2015-04-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65661 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug tree-optimization/65661] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init

2015-04-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65661 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- x86_64?

[Bug target/65660] [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- With a true fix I get t.c:3:20: note: Cost model analysis: Vector inside of loop cost: 4 Vector prologue cost: 13 Vector epilogue cost: 11 Scalar iteration cost: 4 Scalar outside cost: 0 Vector

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

2015-04-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56726] i386: MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is too small (usually)

2015-04-02 Thread fweimer at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/53539] Different __WCHAR_TYPE__/wchar_t for gcc -m32 on Linux/i386 and Linux/x86-64

2015-04-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53539 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65661] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init

2015-04-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65661 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- r221833 Configured with: src/configure --prefix=lean-c/install --with-cloog=infra --with-ppl=infra --with-gmp=infra --with-mpfr=infra --with-mpc=infra --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl

[Bug tree-optimization/65661] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init

2015-04-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65661 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/65661] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init

2015-04-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65661 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- At -O2, it's called from parition_to_var: ... $ gcc src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c -O2 src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c: In function ‘f1’: src/gcc/testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/65661] New: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init

2015-04-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65661 Bug ID: 65661 Summary: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:736, called from partition_view_init Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65660] [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Looks like we now vectorize using loop vect instead of basic-block vectorization. The overhead might be noticable. For example ./ggSpectrum.h:48:4: note: loop vectorized -./ggSpectrum.h:49:18: note: basi

[Bug libstdc++/65659] STL containers not specialized for pointer value_type

2015-04-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65659 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm

2015-04-02 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358 --- Comment #22 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #21) > As this has been failing since GCC 4.6.3, it is not a regression and > therefore Kyrill's fix would not be appropriate for Stage 4. > > It may

[Bug target/65660] [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-czerny-head-64/252_eon_recent.png

[Bug target/65660] [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm

2015-04-02 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/65660] [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mil

[Bug target/65660] New: [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660 Bug ID: 65660 Summary: [5 Regression] 252.eon regression on bdver2 with -Ofast Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm

2015-04-02 Thread hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358 --- Comment #20 from Honggyu Kim --- Hi all, Kyrill submitted a bug fix patch about 2 weeks ago. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01014.html I have tested his patch and found that the problem is clearly fixed. https://gcc.gnu.org/m

[Bug libstdc++/65659] New: STL containers not specialized for pointer value_type

2015-04-02 Thread marc at kdab dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65659 Bug ID: 65659 Summary: STL containers not specialized for pointer value_type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

2015-04-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > also failing from the same bug, gcc.dg/aru-2.c and likely gcc.dg/20021014-1.c. The patch in comment 12 fixes FAIL: gcc.dg/20021014-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/aru-2.c execution test FAIL: gcc

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

2015-04-02 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8) > Hmm, is it still a problem and if so, why it is marked as resolved/invalid? > > crtbegin/crtend should be compiled without LTO even with LTO bootstrap. > Can you

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

2015-04-02 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 35210 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35210&action=edit Test case including temporaries

[Bug ipa/65654] [5 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/65655] [5 Regression] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/65656] __builtin_constant_p should always be constexpr

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65656 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65658] Jump threading too pessimistic when optimizing for size

2015-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65658 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

2015-04-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 > > --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka --- > > Seems to be a regression with -flto only? I a

[Bug driver/65444] -z bndplt isn't passed to linker for -mmpx when building dynamic objects

2015-04-02 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65444 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug driver/65444] -z bndplt isn't passed to linker for -mmpx when building dynamic objects

2015-04-02 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65444 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Apr 2 08:15:49 2015 New Revision: 221831 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221831&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR driver/65444 * config/i386/linux-common.h (MPX_SPEC):

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

2015-04-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #53 from Jan Hubicka --- This patch makes denominator to use resulting function size (not uninlined time like 4.9 did but getting the resulting fraction closer to 4.9 style): Index: ../../gcc/ipa-inline.c =