https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As this has been failing since GCC 4.6.3, it is not a regression and therefore
Kyrill's fix would not be appropriate for Stage 4.
It may be that the release managers make an exception for this fix, given that
it can cause wrong-code generation on a primary target. Otherwise, I'd expect
this to get fixed in 6.0 and backported as appropriate. Richard/Jakub?
