https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #6 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> I think you should always use an unsigned type here so it will be defined in
> the IR. This is mentioned in bug 22199#c3 .
Andrew I missed to includ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
Tony Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony.liu at arm dot com
--- Comment #5 from T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think you should always use an unsigned type here so it will be defined in
the IR. This is mentioned in bug 22199#c3 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is really a duplicate of bug 22199.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
BTW I get:
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-2.c scan-assembler-not xxpermdi
before and after your patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64394
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65065
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #3)
> I just built a toolchain on gcc2-power8.osuosl.org with the configuration
> line:
>
> /home/meissner/fsf-src/trunk/configure
> --prefix=/home/meissner/f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
Bug ID: 65217
Summary: __builtin_unreachable in if statement causes bad
assembly generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 26 02:43:58 2015
New Revision: 220997
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220997&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62255
* pt.c (instantiate_decl): Handle recursive instanti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64162
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
FWIW, problem started with:
commit 6a0440477bc2a41ade7254552829f320755d0f0f
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Feb 14 23:46:25 2015 +
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (growth_data): Add uninlinable field.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64162
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
I just built a toolchain on gcc2-power8.osuosl.org with the configuration line:
/home/meissner/fsf-src/trunk/configure
--prefix=/home/meissner/fsf-install-ppcle64/trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
The ranges are wrong before VRP2. Reassoc2 does something suspicious...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
5.0.0 20150225 (experimental) [trunk revision 220958] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
--
int a, b = 62, e;
volatile int c;
volatile int d;
int
main ()
{
int f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Bug ID: 65215
Summary: [5 Regression] Bswap load miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59948
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
There has been huge progress in gcc-5:
int m() ()
{
struct function h;
:
MEM[(int (*) (int) *)&h] = f;
h._M_invoker = _M_invoke;
h.D.27699._M_manager = _M_manager;
std::_Function_base::_Base_manag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01550.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 25 21:46:29 2015
New Revision: 220991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65209
* decl2.c (constrain_visibility) [VISIBILITY_ANON]: C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last reconfirmed|2015-02-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktietz at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #20)
> Created attachment 34864 [details]
> icfmerge2
>
> Updated version to apply after Jakub's patch
this bootstraps on x86_64-darwin12, and powerpc-darwin9 (at least)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65214
Bug ID: 65214
Summary: [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
The logic to avoid subregs of TImode wasn't getting executed. I have a patch
that fixes this; doing regression testing and then will get it submitted to the
list. Still working in the background on reducing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65112
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65200
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65200
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65203
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #26 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to uros from comment #25)
The linker bug [1] was fixed in binutils 2.25 and GCC workaround was removed
for gcc 5.0.
[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #25 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Feb 25 19:59:31 2015
New Revision: 220990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert:
2014-07-26 Uros Bizjak
PR target/47230
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
> Ping. Precompiled source to reproduce the problem is still missing here.
I will try to provide it in the following days. For both imagemagick and
graphi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
The regression was introduced in this commit:
commit 9eec20bfd5806dd0380e07dbc0f03409ce3d4efb
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 26 09:14:59 2013 +
2013-03-26 Richard Biener
* emit-rtl.c (s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Ping. Precompiled source to reproduce the problem is still missing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Problem is an invalid swap removal in:
bool boost::test_tools::tt_detail::report_assertion(const
boost::test_tools::as\
sertion_result&, const boost::unit_test::lazy_ostream&,
boost::unit_test::const\
_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65213
Bug ID: 65213
Summary: Extend -Wmissing-declarations to variables
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed on trunk by r217758.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz ---
HJ: Does recent patch fixes issue for you too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 18:20:34 2015
New Revision: 220986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Kai Tietz
PR tree-optimization/61917
* tree-vect-loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #19 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 18:21:37 2015
New Revision: 220987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61917
* tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_reductio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz ---
Just posted a fix. For the 4.9 branch I could finally reproduce this error.
It is caused by the PHI-check for a vector-constant, which obviously has no
valid statment ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I certainly can reproduce it, the problem is that reduc_def_stmt is NULL.
dt is vect_constant_def.
preprocessed /tmp/x.i -quiet -dumpbase x.i -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-auxbase x -O -version -ftree-vectorize -o x.i
GNU C (GCC) version 4.9.3 20150225 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7), GMP version
5.1.2, MPFR version 3.1.2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12)
> > Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest
> > with current trunk, I might have a different p
ootstrap --prefix=/usr/gcc-5.0.0
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local --enable-gnu-indirect-function --with-fpmath=sse
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20150225 (experimental) (GCC)
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ---
Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest with
current trunk, I might have a different patch in tree, which makes the
difference here.
Additionally, what target you are using?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
Bug ID: 65212
Summary: --with-arch=nocona and -msse3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 16:46:34 2015
New Revision: 220983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merged from mainline
PR target/64212
* symtab.c (symtab::make_dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 16:44:26 2015
New Revision: 220982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64212
* symtab.c (symtab::make_decl_local): Set DECL_IMPORT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
Note either removing the template argument or moving the typedef out of the
function both solve the issue, and makes gcc use an unaligned load.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65204
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 16:28:28 2015
New Revision: 220981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Precommit code-change of patch by Richard Biener for gcc 6.0
2015-02-25 Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34873|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 34874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34874&action=edit
Slightly reduced test case
==30483== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
==30483==at 0x4C2D143: op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 34873
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34873&action=edit
Intermediate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 34872
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34872&action=edit
Assembler intermediate
It is the "movdqa(%rdx), %xmm1" instruction on line 19 that is wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
Bug ID: 65211
Summary: Type alignment lost inside templated function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 25 15:49:34 2015
New Revision: 220974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/58315
* decl.c (start_preparsed_function): Use create_ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65210
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Tested patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01502.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65210
Bug ID: 65210
Summary: [avr] ICE: when using attributs 'address' and 'io_low'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65208
Bug ID: 65208
Summary: Floats sometimes rounded up instead of being truncated
on mips
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
--- Comment #7 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Feb 25 15:05:48 2015
New Revision: 220970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65167
* gcc/config/i386/i386.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64337
guillaume.sabouret at starqube dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillaume.saboure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Bug ID: 65209
Summary: [5.0 regression] Broken code with global static
variables, invalid pointer when freeing global
variables
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I'm talking about
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a: _5 = a1[i_16];
stmt_b: MASK_STORE (_34, 0B, _ifc__32, _9);
) -> dependence analysis failed
somehow it works for
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We apply versioning for aliasing but compute it as always aliasing in some way,
thus the runtime check gets immediately folded and thus the vectorized loop
removed:
t.c:7:3: note: create runtime check for d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> Well, can someone overwrite dllimport symbol by different definition?
> If not, it is a bug of decl_binds_to_current_def_p to return false here.
> If it can be inteprpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65207
Bug ID: 65207
Summary: [5 regression] performance: tree level loop
optimization does not peel SpecCPU href loop
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derodat at adacore dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
Created attachment 34868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34868&action=edit
patch to generate DWARF-compliant DW_AT_static_link attributes
gcc/
* tree-nested.c (finalize_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64997
--- Comment #2 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Wed Feb 25 14:20:13 2015
New Revision: 220969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220969&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix illegal assembly 'eon v1, v2, v3'
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 14:12:46 2015
New Revision: 220968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Richard Biener
Kai Tietz
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 34867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34867&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Test needs to be compiled with -Ofast -m64 -mcore-avx2 options.
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
