https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34831|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65160
Bug ID: 65160
Summary: Linker forgets definition of type_info::__is_pointer_p
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159
Bug ID: 65159
Summary: Linker forgets definition of type_info::__is_pointer_p
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 34831
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34831&action=edit
a possible patch
I think the problem is latent on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 34828
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34828&action=edit
reduced testcase
Looks an interesting "why didn't we see it?" target bug.
The problem happens at peephole2 ph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe ---
so .. the problem on Darwin seems to be when we have an alias which is a vtable
reference to a method.
Then we have alias->callers == NULL, and it seems we don't have anything in
place to replace the referenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64531
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
The following fixes the problem:
Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c
===
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.c(revision 220889)
+++ gcc/config/sh/sh.c(working copy)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5)
> The problem is the following insn:
>
> (insn 45 11 12 2 (set (reg:HI 168 [ x ])
> (subreg/s/u:HI (reg:SI 147 t) 0)) cchMsw9Z.out:9 -1
> (expr_list:REG_DEAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64531
Egor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65158
Bug ID: 65158
Summary: printf attribute error reporting assumes single-byte
characters
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor ---
The patch has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01324.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
The problem is the following insn:
(insn 45 11 12 2 (set (reg:HI 168 [ x ])
(subreg/s/u:HI (reg:SI 147 t) 0)) cchMsw9Z.out:9 -1
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 147 t)
(nil)))
which is not in sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 34825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34825&action=edit
a reduced test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65157
Bug ID: 65157
Summary: Unable to define a static template member function of
a nested class as a friend of a sibling class.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62272
Guille changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guille at cal dot berkeley.edu
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #14)
> Just trying to help out where I can. It's similar to the round robin use
> of reload regs we've had in reload for a while. THe idea was to hopefully
> ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65156
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Feb 21 18:57:02 2015
New Revision: 220889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220889&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65156
* gnat.dg/timing_events.adb: Removed, invalid test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65156
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-02-20, at 1:49 PM, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> sqrtl is not available on hpux. It seems at some point before r214253
> the test started running, probably using sqrtq from libqua
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65156
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65156
Bug ID: 65156
Summary: [5 regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/timing_events.adb
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65155
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
This is caused by AIX keeping the plugin shared object cached after running the
testsuite. I guess this means the best solution is deleting the library before
relinking it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
The first error that comes up is a missing
std::__codecvt_utf8_base::do_unshift(__mbstate_t&, char*, char*,
char*&) [libstdc++ reference to itself]
===
And indeed, if prevent the redirect_callers for darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65155
Bug ID: 65155
Summary: libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm installation failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|sh: "insn does not satisfy |[SH][4.9 Regression] "insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
so .. in principle, if we are not creating an alias, it should not matter if
the target supports aliases or not.
I'm wondering if we're somehow deleting an alias that is used elsewhere in the
callgraph. I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63427
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 34823
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34823&action=edit
Pre-compiled source file for libmcrypt 2.5.8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 34822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34822&action=edit
Pre-compiled source file for libav 11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
fix posted here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01320.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01320.html
(tested at r220887)
Looking at current output - recurser_void1 is sib-calling recurser_void2, but
not vice-versa.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
struct ss {
ss() {};
};
struct C {
ss s;
};
int main() {
C cs[5]{};
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
Bug ID: 65154
Summary: ICE with {} initialized array with string
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
44 matches
Mail list logo
