https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42618
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42618
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
This is fixed in 4.9.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13). Close?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63730
Bug ID: 63730
Summary: C++11 ICE REGRESSION mangling template alias into
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57740
Michael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjbshaw at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
mednafen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to mednafen from comment #2)
> If this construct is invalid as you say it is, then how exactly is one
> supposed to access data of arbitrary types at arbitrary byte offsets in a
> contiguous chunk o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
--- Comment #2 from mednafen at gmail dot com ---
If this construct is invalid as you say it is, then how exactly is one supposed
to access data of arbitrary types at arbitrary byte offsets in a contiguous
chunk of memory?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is no type punning through an union here. You can't use a cast to do the
type punning through an union.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
Bug ID: 63729
Summary: Type-punning through a union fails to circumvent
strict aliasing under certain conditions.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #8 from Joey Ye ---
(In reply to vries from comment #5)
> Created attachment 33874 [details]
> tentative patch, adds missing clobbers
This patch does recover thumb1 bootstrap
- Joey
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63728
Bug ID: 63728
Summary: Memory exhaustion using constexpr constructors for
classes with large array members
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56196
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61099
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34584
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34957
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63698
--- Comment #7 from François Dumont ---
Yes, looks like I had forgotten node with only a left child, too bad. My
initial plan was to use existing tree node algos in tree.cc but erase could not
be done without rebalancing which was useless for wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||htl10 at users dot
sourceforge.net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #6 from Michael Felt ---
thanks. it is night. shall look at this again tomorrow.
had not spotted CONFIG_SHELL among the how to build ada text. I had been
trying to follow what seemed relevant. must write my own document headers I
gues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#Configuration_fails_with_.27.27configure:_error:_cannot_compute_suffix_of_object_files:_cannot_compile.27.27._What_is_the_problem.3F
(and for selecting the shell: https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63538
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
What I have not yet found is how to get the SHELL variable to not use
/bin/sh because this is causing a failure immediately at the start of
make:
root@x064:[/data/prj/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc-4.7.4]make
[ -f stage_final ] || echo stage3 > stage_final
/bin/sh[3]: 0403-057 Syntax error at line 1 : `-qlang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
Bug ID: 63727
Summary: Checks missing for proc-pointer components: Usage as
actual argument when elemental
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
I fear that after being set to "wontfix" an entry such as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714 will be completely
ignored.
That is not what I was expecting having spent nearly 8 hours yesterday
looking for something I may have missed.
I do not understand how to move forward from: D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63726
Bug ID: 63726
Summary: -Xlinker --threads cause random crash on gcc 4.9.2
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #32 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #31)
> WONTFIX sounds reasonable
Okay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991
Bug 41991 depends on bug 44107, which changed state.
Bug 44107 Summary: gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin
{8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
.
||com
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
The problem seems to be fixed in gcc HEAD 5.0.0 20141103 (experimental).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62272
rippey.e at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rippey.e at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63595
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Same problem can be even seen on x86_64-linux-pc:
_ZNK13TriangulationILi3EE3endEv:
.LFB5569:
.cfi_startproc
> subq$24, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
movq%rsp, %rdi
call_ZNK13Tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #4 from Michael Felt ---
Created attachment 33880
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33880&action=edit
script-capture of 4.6.4 bootstrap attempt on AIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #3 from Michael Felt ---
Created attachment 33879
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33879&action=edit
script-capture of 4.7.4 bootstrap attempt on AIX
two script files capturing all screen output of attempted boots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #2 from Michael Felt ---
How do you suggest I bootstrap then?
There are some ancient RPM versions I know of, but they "break" AIX in that
they introduce non-standard libraries I am trying to avoid.
While 4.9.2 and 4.8.3 may be a bri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #2 from Tavian Barnes ---
It's decltype(requires_conversion({std::declval()})). Not sure why
it says .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63725
Bug ID: 63725
Summary: Scalar_Storage_Order is required for nested string
types, but cannot be added to those types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
Bug ID: 63724
Summary: [AArch64] Inefficient immediate expansion and
hoisting.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 10/31/2014 5:30 PM, aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi wrote:
> I was able to isolate the problem to GLIBC elf/dl-conflict.c and specifically
> hppa specific elf_machine_rela function called from th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Bug ID: 63723
Summary: Narrowing conversion allowed in braced init list in
SFINAE context
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63198
--- Comment #2 from Bob Abeles ---
This bug occurs when cp/parser.c:cp_parser_name() while parsing 'decltype(y =
y)::t1' is called on 't1'. Earlier, the decltype has been determined to be
dependent (it isn't actually in this case, but doing so ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63722
Bug ID: 63722
Summary: Dwarf DW_AT_inline incorrect for abstract origins
created for ipa-sra, ipa-split and ipa-cp
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
--- Comment #4 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, but this is definitely not the same issue. Bug 38958 is about returning
by value and binding to a reference. This issue is about returning a REFERENCE
and binding it to a reference. No class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 3 12:39:42 2014
New Revision: 217038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New test.
Added:
branches/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 3 12:37:59 2014
New Revision: 217037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New test.
Added:
branches/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 3 12:35:35 2014
New Revision: 217036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217036&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56917
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #21 from karsten ---
Thank you, but the 4.9.0 Mavericks built throws the same error:
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"___cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length", referenced from:
create_parameters_gui(bool) in ccnFtqfx.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63709
Peter A. Bigot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to karsten from comment #19)
> I have replaced the resp. library by my MacPorts build and it compiles now!
> Perhaps a hacker way, however. Perhaps I install the compiler from MacPorts
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #19 from karsten ---
Merci François for your efforts.
I have replaced the resp. library by my MacPorts build and it compiles now!
Perhaps a hacker way, however. Perhaps I install the compiler from MacPorts
after these experiences. An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61997
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63709
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joey Ye from comment #6)
> (In reply to vries from comment #5)
> > Could you try out the patch and see if it fixes things for you?
> >
> Tom, thanks for the quick action. Apparantly th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
Bug ID: 63721
Summary: [5 Regression] IPA ICF cause
atomic-comp-swap-release-acquire.c ICE on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57820
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 3 10:49:05 2014
New Revision: 217035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-03 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/57820
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Mon Nov 3 10:47:04 2014
New Revision: 217034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-03 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimization/60770
gcc/
* tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57820
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #3 from Paol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Mon Nov 3 10:36:35 2014
New Revision: 217033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-03 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimization/63666
* fold-const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #6 from Joey Ye ---
(In reply to vries from comment #5)
> Could you try out the patch and see if it fixes things for you?
>
Tom, thanks for the quick action. Apparantly this patch should recover the
bootstrap. I will test it and come
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63695
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63720
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63720
Bug ID: 63720
Summary: Ada bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63708
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63716
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
means you ran out of memory and the kernel decided to kill GCC.
I'd say try without -g or with -fno-var-tracking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63717
Morwenn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
Summary|[4.9.2 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #4 from Joey Ye ---
Created attachment 33873
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33873&action=edit
Preprocessed testcase
Options to reproduce:
-march=armv4t -mthumb -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63719
Bug ID: 63719
Summary: gcc-set-multilib-library-path usage outside of
gcc/testsuite/
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #3 from Joey Ye ---
Created attachment 33872
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33872&action=edit
Reduced rtl dump previous pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #2 from Joey Ye ---
Created attachment 33871
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33871&action=edit
Reduced rtl dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye ---
Challenging to reduce a small case, as inlining impacts optimization behavior.
Trying to describe the problem as clear as possible.
Problemetic generated code:
mov r0, r10
mov r1, r3
86 matches
Mail list logo
