https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to mednafen from comment #2)
> If this construct is invalid as you say it is, then how exactly is one
> supposed to access data of arbitrary types at arbitrary byte offsets in a
> contiguous chunk of memory?

memcpy.

Reply via email to