[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 --- Comment #10 from nightstrike --- So should I open a new PR for not warning in C++? Because even the "= {0}" case warns there.

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 --- Comment #4 from qiuji --- Thanks very much! The problem can be closed.

[Bug c/60857] segmentation fault after called exit () with a large stack frame.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60857] New: segmentation fault after called exit () with a large stack frame.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60857 Bug ID: 60857 Summary: segmentation fault after called exit () with a large stack frame. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 --- Comment #2 from qiuji --- Created attachment 32613 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32613&action=edit compiling log with option "-v -save-temps "

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 --- Comment #1 from qiuji --- Configuration of the version of gcc I used: 使用内建 specs。 COLLECT_GCC=mips-mti-linux-gnu-gcc 目标：mips-mti-linux-gnu 配置为：/export/tmp/sellcey/for_eembc/src/gcc/configure --prefix=/export/tmp/sellcey/for_eembc/install-mips

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] New: GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 Bug ID: 60856 Summary: GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug bootstrap/50888] Bootstrap failure in libjava against latest git glibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888 Wade Colson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wade.colson at aol dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug middle-end/60855] ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured stack-allocated array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60855 --- Comment #1 from Brady J. Garvin --- Also ICEs in 4.9.0: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper

[Bug middle-end/60855] New: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured statically allocated array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60855 Bug ID: 60855 Summary: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured statically allocated array Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Co

[Bug c++/60854] New: inline constructor of extern template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60854 Bug ID: 60854 Summary: inline constructor of extern template Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/60850] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- So keep pinging it, bugzilla isn't the right place.

[Bug fortran/60853] New: Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 Bug ID: 60853 Summary: Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/60850] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Gutson --- It went, but I got no answer. FWIW: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00026.html

[Bug libstdc++/60710] experimental::optional is using T::operator!=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The current Fundamentals TS draft (n3848) doesn't have those operator!= overloads at all, so we may want to remove them entirely rather than fix them ... I'm not sure yet.

[Bug c++/60852] boost::has_complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c/36839] struct with only anonymous unions plus flexible array member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36839 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/60852] boost::has_complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/60852] boost::has_complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 --- Comment #1 from Nevin Liber --- Also filed this as a Boost bug at https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/9913

[Bug lto/60820] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ice in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 > > --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- > Patch works for me for net-misc/nx package. Will you merge the patch to > gcc-4.9 > branch? Richard approved it f

[Bug c++/60852] New: boost::complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 Bug ID: 60852 Summary: boost::complement of enum class does not compile Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/60849] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] bogus comparison result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/60849] bogus comparison result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/60497] unique_ptr tries to complete its type T even though it's not required to be a complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > Now the question would be: are there similar statements throughout the > library that could benefit from the same treatment, or is this a special > case? It's a g

[Bug target/60851] New: ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2117 with -flive-range-shrinkage -mdispatch-scheduler -march=bdver4

trunk/binary-209399-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.10.0 20140415 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/60786] In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've fixed the libstdc++ tests so they don't rely on this bug

[Bug c++/60786] In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 19:05:45 2014 New Revision: 209431 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209431&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60786 * testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/requirements/explicit_i

[Bug c++/60850] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- patches should go to the gcc-patches list, not bugzilla

[Bug c++/60850] New: pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 Bug ID: 60850 Summary: pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Sebastian, sorry for the problems. Please double check that reverting this patch has fixed your bootstrap issue and mark the bug resolved if so. Thanks!

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:30:21 2014 New Revision: 209430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209430&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt PR target/60839 Revert the following p

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:30:21 2014 New Revision: 209430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209430&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt PR target/60839 Revert the following p

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:20:01 2014 New Revision: 209425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209425&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt PR target/60839 Revert following patch

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:25:09 2014 New Revision: 209426 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209426&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt PR target/60839 Revert the following p

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:25:09 2014 New Revision: 209426 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209426&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt PR target/60839 Revert the following p

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:20:01 2014 New Revision: 209425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209425&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt PR target/60839 Revert following patch

[Bug c++/60848] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 --- Comment #3 from ibronstein at klocwork dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > This is of course totally invalid code, you can't define > std::initializer_list yourself. Agreed.

[Bug c++/60848] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/60849] New: bogus comparison result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849 Bug ID: 60849 Summary: bogus comparison result type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/60848] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #21) > (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #17) > > Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a > > personal build of cygwin's gcc. It worked f

[Bug c++/60848] New: Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 Bug ID: 60848 Summary: Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug libstdc++/60037] SIGFPE in std::generate_canonical

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note that -fdump-tree-all dumps are pretty much the same short length, it is just -fdump-tree-vect-details that goes to almost a gig. And, an important thing I've noticed in there is tons of SLP node creation

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #21 from Denis Excoffier --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #17) > Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a > personal build of cygwin's gcc. It worked fine in stage2. I couldn't > reproduce the repo

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 32603 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32603&action=edit pr60841.c Somewhat reduced testcase. With 4.8 as well as r200967 according to -Ofast -ftime-report needs about 5M

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #20 from Denis Excoffier --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12) > In general it would be of interest > to learn what destructors (by whom) are present in the list called by > do_global_dtors (&__DTOR_LIST__) I've rebuilt everyth

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #19 from Denis Excoffier --- Created attachment 32602 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32602&action=edit discover __DTOR_LIST__

[Bug target/60847] [4.9/4.10 Regression] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/60847] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Sanjay Patel changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c --- Comment #3 from Sanjay Patel --- He

[Bug target/60847] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/60847] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 --- Comment #1 from Sanjay Patel --- It looks like an extra leading underscore is required to recognize the BMI intrinsics. This is not happening with other (BMI2, SSE4) intrinsics. According to the Intel reference docs and previous versions of

[Bug rtl-optimization/56965] nonoverlapping_component_refs_p is bogus and slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56965 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 15 16:04:11 2014 New Revision: 209423 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209423&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Richard Biener PR rtl-optimization/56965 * alias.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/56965] nonoverlapping_component_refs_p is bogus and slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56965 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60847] New: x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Bug ID: 60847 Summary: x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assi

[Bug libstdc++/60594] [4.8/4.9 Regression] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.10.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9/4.10

[Bug libstdc++/60594] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 15:25:52 2014 New Revision: 209422 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209422&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60594 * include/std/functional (function::_Callable):

[Bug target/60817] gcc configure script misdetects TLS support on x86_64-pc-solaris* with gnu as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60817 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug c/60846] Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|4.9.0

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Per discussion on IRC, we are going to revert this patch on 4.8, 4.9, and 4.10. This will mean that PR60735 will have to be reopened for a better fix. The patch seems to leave things in a worse state than pre

[Bug libstdc++/60695] std::atomic doesn't work when X is of zero size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60695 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60846] New: Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Bug ID: 60846 Summary: Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug rtl-optimization/60663] [4.9 Regression] Errors out on valid inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Apr 15 14:04:06 2014 New Revision: 209419 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/60663 * config/arm/arm.c (arm_n

[Bug libstdc++/60695] std::atomic doesn't work when X is of zero size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60695 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 13:48:07 2014 New Revision: 209418 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60695 * include/std/atomic (atomic<_Tp>): Add static a

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > For reduced testcase, I'm now at cca 8KB, but creduce is progressing slowly. Yes. I've tried this for a while yesterday, but gave up. ("ulimit -v 100" w

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- For reduced testcase, I'm now at cca 8KB, but creduce is progressing slowly.

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/60823] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:5644

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60823 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- I'd like to notice that this is test with using 'omp declare simd' pragma and issue is rather related to its support in gcc.

[Bug c++/60845] New: print original type for typedef classes in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60845 Bug ID: 60845 Summary: print original type for typedef classes in diagnostics Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz --- Another side-note. You should specify option '--disable-multilib'. this is pretty essential as cygwin doesn't support it right now.

[Bug tree-optimization/60844] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/60817] gcc configure script misdetects TLS support on x86_64-pc-solaris* with gnu as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60817 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Ruud Koolen --- > I generated the patch cleanly against trunk. What's wrong with it? Seems to be a quirk of bugzilla: if you download the patch via Diff -> Context

[Bug libstdc++/60734] Undefined behavior in g++-v4/bits/stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60734 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far

[Bug libstdc++/60734] Undefined behavior in g++-v4/bits/stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60734 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 10:52:06 2014 New Revision: 209414 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209414&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60734 * include/bits/stl_tree.h (_Rb_tree::_M_end): Fi

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz --- Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a personal build of cygwin's gcc. It worked fine in stage2. I couldn't reproduce the reported ICE on stage2. Which brings me to the question

[Bug tree-optimization/60844] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/60844] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844 Bug ID: 60844 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug lto/60820] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ice in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Patch works for me for net-misc/nx package. Will you merge the patch to gcc-4.9 branch?

[Bug other/60843] New: Documentation: 4.5 Integers/C99 6.3.1.3 ("reduce modulo 2^N")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60843 Bug ID: 60843 Summary: Documentation: 4.5 Integers/C99 6.3.1.3 ("reduce modulo 2^N") Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cgf at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #14) > I'm now using plain cygwin-1.7.29-2, the cygwin1.dbg now matches with > cygwin1.dll. I've alto tried to recompile without -O2. I'm not so familiar > with gdb, i've

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #14 from Denis Excoffier --- I'm now using plain cygwin-1.7.29-2, the cygwin1.dbg now matches with cygwin1.dll. I've alto tried to recompile without -O2. I'm not so familiar with gdb, i've produced a session where i break at __call_exi

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #13 from Denis Excoffier --- Created attachment 32600 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32600&action=edit gdb session stepping until the end

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Huber --- Created attachment 32599 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32599&action=edit Pre-processed source of libgcc2.c Command line without pre-processor relevant options: xgcc -mcpu=8540 -g -O2

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 15 08:04:17 2014 New Revision: 209405 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209405&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR plugins/59335 * Makefile.in (PLUGIN_HEADERS): Add various header

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 15 08:02:46 2014 New Revision: 209404 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209404&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR plugins/59335 * Makefile.in (PLUGIN_HEADERS): Add various header

[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- With --param vect-max-version-for-alias-checks=10 -Ofast it started with r200968.