[Bug c/11751] wrong evaluation order of an expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11751 Elizbath Martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elizbathjames at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug libstdc++/50160] vector comparison very slow (no overload)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160 Elizbath Martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elizbathjames at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug libgcc/60790] libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|go

[Bug c/59073] [4.9 Regression] ICE with missing increment in OpenMP for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug go/60790] libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790 Gary Funck changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32569|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug go/60790] New: libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790 Bug ID: 60790 Summary: libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 9 00:09:28 2014 New Revision: 209230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-04-08 Paolo Carlini PR c++/59115 * pt.c (pro

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- > > Is this what you meant by the 'curly quotes'? > No. Your input file contains curly quotes. I've changed the curly quotes to # show you where the problem lies. met_file = #met_04270_62_65.txt# Compar

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #8 from Laura C --- I've tried changing the Input.f90 code to character(len=70) :: & dem_file='', &! Elevation file name met_file='', &! Driving data file name vegf_file='', &! Vegetation fraction file name vegh

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #7 from Laura C --- I've tried changing the Input.f90 code to character(len=70) :: & dem_file='', &! Elevation file name met_file='', &! Driving data file name vegf_file='', &! Vegetation fraction file name vegh

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #12 from John Marino --- I am also seeing these errors: s-intman.adb:263:32: "SA_NODEFER" is not visible s-intman.adb:263:32: non-visible declaration at s-linux.ads:110 s-intman.adb:263:45: "SA_RESTART" is not visible s-intman.adb:263

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 John Marino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnugcc at marino dot st --- Comment #11 fro

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 8 20:35:14 2014 New Revision: 209227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209227&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/60411 * sigtramp.h: Add Android support. Modified:

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60774] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60789] New: [4.9 Regression] Missing -lm while checking for math functions (e.g., atan2f)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60789 Bug ID: 60789 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Missing -lm while checking for math functions (e.g., atan2f) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/60788] Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 --- Comment #3 from Allan Jensen --- Sorry for the confusion. I thought Intel had added it from Ivy Bridge, but it was Haswell.

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #18 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Apr 8 17:50:45 2014 New Revision: 209223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209223&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/60763 * config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm just saying this for the record, and also to justify why I think the other use of simplify_gen_subreg is correct. (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #14) > When you are doing a sub

[Bug sanitizer/60745] Many ICEs running libstdc++ testsuite with ubsan, maybe due to PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60745 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/60745] Many ICEs running libstdc++ testsuite with ubsan, maybe due to PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60745 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Apr 8 17:23:26 2014 New Revision: 209222 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209222&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/60745 * c-ubsan.c: Include asan.h. (ubsan_instru

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn --- Comment on attachment 32568 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32568 Patch with changelog and comment. Okay. Thanks for the clarification.

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32557|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/60788] Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/51088] undefined label with statement expression and cond expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51088 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Patch to give an error if taking an address of a label defined in ({}): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00381.html

[Bug target/60459] Crash seen in _Unwind_VRS_Pop() for ARM platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459 Murali changed: What|Removed |Added CC||murali.marimekala at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/60788] Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 --- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen --- Sorry. The optimization has nothing to do with it, it just causes the constant expressions used for testing to be evaluated at compile time. The real issue is that the lzcnt instruction does not return the num

[Bug target/60788] New: Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 Bug ID: 60788 Summary: Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targe

[Bug libstdc++/60037] SIGFPE in std::generate_canonical

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- clang's ubsan finds two errors /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc:3478: runtime error: value 4.29497e+09 is outside the range of representable values o

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner --- On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:21:13PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 > > --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn --- > Gentlemen, I really do not unders

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "", in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > 4.8 prints > > t.ii: In function ‘void _Z3fooi.constprop.0()’: > t.ii:14:8: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] > z[i] = i; >

[Bug middle-end/58101] Wrong out-of-bounds warning under -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58101 Mikhail Veltishchev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dichlofos-mv at yandex dot ru --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn --- Gentlemen, I really do not understand this discussion. I used the term "crude" and receive a response that it is not crude, but it is dangerous. WTF? Why is anyone trying to "sell" the patch when I repeated

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/60653] [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in lra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Tue Apr 8 14:18:46 2014 New Revision: 209221 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209221&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-08 Andreas Krebbel PR rtl-optimization/60776 * gcc.d

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "", in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > which isn't perfect either. Is there a way for the C++ FE to get at the > original function decl that was cloned? Like with > > Index: gcc/cp/error.c > =

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Maybe latent on 4.8/4.9, different inlining happens there.

[Bug middle-end/60787] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 Bug ID: 60787 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: EH, ice-on-va

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.4, 4.8.0, 4.9.0 Version|4

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "", in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > does former_clone_of apply recursively? Thus can we have a clone of a clone? > Is there a way to "pretty-print" the kind of clone? That is, say > for

[Bug target/60300] [avr] Suboptimal stack pointer manipulation for frame setup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60300 --- Comment #3 from Matthijs Kooijman --- Hmm, I don't think the gcc sources support that. AFAICT, they attempt to just find the shortest approach, without caring for speed. For example, look at avr.c, around line 1265, where it says:

[Bug libfortran/60706] FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_kind_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original "var2 = 42949673 00;"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60706 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/60706] FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_kind_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original "var2 = 42949673 00;"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60706 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 8 12:57:07 2014 New Revision: 209216 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209216&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-08 Richard Biener PR middle-end/60706 * tree-pretty-p

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 32565 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32565&action=edit gcc49-pr60655.patch Alternate fix, the issue on the non-fdata-sections testcase is that we have (note 226 225 22

[Bug c++/60786] New: In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 Bug ID: 60786 Summary: In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "", in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener -

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "", in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- 4.8 prints t.ii: In function ‘void _Z3fooi.constprop.0()’: t.ii:14:8: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] z[i] = i; ^ which isn't perfect either. Is there a way for

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Created attachment 32564 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32564&action=edit patch... Fix so far tested just on the reduced and the full testcase. No issues. Now bootstrapping and re

[Bug target/60653] [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in lra

figure --target=arm-suse-linux-gnueabihf --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20140408 (experimental) (GCC) thus, fixed?

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- I haven't had enough time to work on this one but in the interest of getting this sorted for 4.9, I'm handling this as suggested by Jakub in the backend under targetm.const_not_ok_for_debug_p and disal

[Bug fortran/60500] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/60602] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c FAILs on Solaris 9/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 8 10:59:40 2014 New Revision: 209214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209214&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-08 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/60785 * graphi

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60602] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c FAILs on Solaris 9/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Tue Apr 8 10:56:04 2014 New Revision: 209213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209213&root=gcc&view=rev Log: XFAIL gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c on Solaris 9/SPARC (PR target/60602) P

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Curly quotes in met_file = ‘met_04270_62_65.txt’ The following code implicit none character(len=70) :: & dem_file='', &! Elevation file name met_file='', &! Driving data file name

[Bug libstdc++/60594] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Mitsuru Kariya from comment #5) > FYI, the BUG2 above is compiled successfully by gcc 4.7.3. Yes, but std::function in 4.7.3 fails other, more important tests.

[Bug lto/60779] -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Note this applies to the case where you don't specify any -fcx-* flag on the linker command-line (or on any of the input TUs, but merging conflicting flags there doesn't work).

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #5 from Laura C --- Yes, I type ./JIM_exe

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 8 09:03:42 2014 New Revision: 209211 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209211&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/60411 * sigtramp-armdroid.c: New file. Added: trunk/

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/60778] shift not folded into shift on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60778 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Status|

[Bug lto/60779] -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto, missed-optimization Sta

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 8 08:23:56 2014 New Revision: 209210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209210&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/60411 * gcc-interface/Makefile.in (arm% linux-android): S

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #208 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Both issues from Comment 201 were fixed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00338.html