http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler ---
I have submitted a request to the core group for clarification, but personally
I believe that the intention is clearly to never implicitly-declare an explicit
default constructor, just as we have the same rul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, the first attachment is for powepc64le-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420
Bug ID: 60420
Summary: [C++11] Bogus "error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be
applied to ‘int&’" with lambda
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Do we need to verify that basic block DEST has a single predecessor?
This patch works for me:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c b/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c
index 926d300..0ed15df 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
Bug ID: 60419
Summary: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418
Bug ID: 60418
Summary: [4.9 Regression] 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 is
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 4 22:16:12 2014
New Revision: 208333
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60417
* typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 4 22:16:03 2014
New Revision: 208332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60415
PR c++/54359
* parser.c (cp_parser_direct_declarato
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 4 22:16:03 2014
New Revision: 208332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60415
PR c++/54359
* parser.c (cp_parser_direct_declarato
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Compiling with optimization and linking without it in LTO mode is one of the
most clever ideas I have seen recently so I agree that a kludge is good
enough...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57754
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59760
gaba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaba at freemail dot hu
--- Comment #4 from gaba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60416
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler ---
I agree that this is unwanted, but I can deduce astonishing little information
what the standard requires here. For copy/move operations we have at least
12.3.1 p3 saying
"An implicitly-declared copy/move co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60416
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
Bug ID: 60417
Summary: [4.9 regression] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03
aggregate initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #12 from Meador Inge ---
The latest patch LGTM. I don't currently have ARM hardware setup for a
bootstrap, but I did run all the GCC and GLIBC tests for the default options
and -mthumb via QEMU. I saw no regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60416
Bug ID: 60416
Summary: [4.9 Regression] aggregate init will not use explicit
default constructors for members with no
initializer-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #12 from Dilawar Singh ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #10)
> Looks like a dup of PR 48891.
Yes. It is very similar to this. Fine with me if it is marked dup.
I was mistaken about gcc version on server. It is default gcc co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
> Looks like a dup of PR 48891.
See also the comments for PR 54130.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=196765
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60414
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415
Bug ID: 60415
Summary: [4.9 regression] Bogus "invalid use of qualified-name"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I think this is another duplicate of pr323.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60414
Bug ID: 60414
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Lortie ---
It seems like a good solution to this problem might be to enable -mfpmath=sse
by default on arches where SSE is known to be supported and
-fexcess-precision=standard otherwise. If people want their binaries to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Ryan Lortie from comment #2)
> Why is this violation of standards treated in a special way?
Because it slows down things way too much. Much better is just to use -msse2
-mfpmath=sse if you reall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Lortie ---
Why is this violation of standards treated in a special way?
Quoting from gcc's manpage:
-ffast-math
Sets -fno-math-errno, -funsafe-math-optimizations,
-ffinite-math-only, -fno-rou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413
Bug ID: 60413
Summary: extra precision not properly removed on assignment of
return value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
Bug ID: 60412
Summary: superfluous arithmetic generated for uneven tail
handling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Bug ID: 60411
Summary: ADA canadian cross build fails.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(dup of PR 33935)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> If you include stdlib.h and not cstdlib it's a glibc bug, not a
> gcc/libstdc++ one.
It would make sense for libstdc++ to provide wrappers to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335
--- Comment #13 from PaX Team ---
another missing include in trunk: tree-cfgcleanup.h (it seems that it was split
from tree-flow.h which used to be installed for plugins for gcc 4.5-4.8).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
Looks like a dup of PR 48891.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57295
--- Comment #2 from Wojciech Migda ---
Created attachment 32261
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32261&action=edit
Proposed patch
Analysis of the reported problem has shown that expanding movmisalign
instruction did not take in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32252|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60226
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yep. r189974.
Looks like the target is confused by building a -fshort-double V2DF with
using double_type_node.
Probably broken also on i?86, just not triggered.
OTOH, -fshort-double is a red herring ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, definitely. It should get fixed automatically by switching to the new
std::string impl.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So 5.0 material, given that we are not going to change std::string in 4.9?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60408
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60405
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 4 11:25:50 2014
New Revision: 208311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-04 Richard Biener
PR lto/60405
* lto-streamer-in.c (l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Bug ID: 60410
Summary: -fshort-double ICEs x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 32258
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32258&action=edit
gcc49-pr59308.patch
Patch (only tested on x86_64-linux with
--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m32/-march=i386,-m64\} whe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #9 from Dilawar Singh ---
The snippet I sent you (in url filed) is a part of large project which compiles
fine on Ubuntu-server (gcc4.7.x, I am not sure about x).
I will confirm it later once I login onto server again. Once I change `
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||victor.robertson.iv at gmail
dot c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60409
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60409
Bug ID: 60409
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE on valid with template
function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|call of overloaded ‘isnan’ |[C++11call of overloaded
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
If you include stdlib.h and not cstdlib it's a glibc bug, not a gcc/libstdc++
one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60389
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 4 11:02:47 2014
New Revision: 208310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208310&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60382
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60408
Bug ID: 60408
Summary: ARM: inefficient code for vget_lane_f32 intrinsic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Mar 4 10:52:18 2014
New Revision: 208309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208309&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/gcc/cp
2014-03-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60376
* parse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #5 from Dilawar Singh ---
Hi,
Added the *.ii file and g++ -v output. Since one file was large, links are
given.
(In reply to Dilawar Singh from comment #4)
> g++ info can be found here
>
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=dA05h3ku
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
Dilawar Singh changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gist.githubusercont
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 32254 [details]
> > gcc49-pr58595-2.patch
> >
> > So what about this variant?
>
> I'l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
But I cannot reproduce it with what I thought it was, please provide the
preprocessed source.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This sounds like you are including math.h and then later on cmath. I don't
know if this is a valid thing to do.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60405
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
Bug ID: 60407
Summary: call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Ah, g++ gives the ICE :(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58880
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60150
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev ---
Ok, but there is no «#define XXX» before «#include "pr60150.H"» in pr60150_0.C,
which does not seem to be correct.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 4 08:47:55 2014
New Revision: 208305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60382
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60082
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
92 matches
Mail list logo
