http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417

--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> ---
I have submitted a request to the core group for clarification, but personally
I believe that the intention is clearly to never implicitly-declare an explicit
default constructor, just as we have the same rule for copy/move consttructors.

Reply via email to