http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
Bug ID: 59871
Summary: No unused value warning for comma expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This looks just as a missed diagnostics of invalid source.
Both in C++11 and in n3690 there is in [over.literal]/5:
"The declaration of a literal operator template shall have an empty
parameter-declaration-cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Gcc should warn conversion |Gcc should warn conversion
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59870
Bug ID: 59870
Summary: Gcc should warn conversion from "const char*" to
"char*"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Another VTA time hog. Try add -fno-var-tracking-assignments.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59869
Bug ID: 59869
Summary: [C++11] std::weak_ptr is thread-unsafe when built with
-fno-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #2 from Michael Sartain ---
Created attachment 31882
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31882&action=edit
Assembly output from -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #1 from Michael Sartain ---
Created attachment 31881
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31881&action=edit
blah.cpp file (from running gcc -E)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
Bug ID: 59868
Summary: Extremely slow compile times
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59863
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is caused by checking TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the a decl which is correct
thing to do but the issue is there is no addressing taking in the code (only an
implicit one with a[i]:
/* An array that is inde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59863
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, sam at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is there anything in the C standard preventing a const array declared in a
> function from being put in .rodata or are those missed optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59866
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59866
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 17 22:43:03 2014
New Revision: 206738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/59866
runtime: Force work variable in mgc0 to be aligned on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59866
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 17 22:42:38 2014
New Revision: 206737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206737&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/59866
runtime: Force work variable in mgc0 to be aligned on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
Bug ID: 59867
Summary: Template string literal loses first symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It's certainly my mindset right now.. But fully understand the complaints
you're getting from the autotester :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58125
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59866
Bug ID: 59866
Summary: gccgo gc work buffer is misaligned
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58125
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Jan 17 21:10:42 2014
New Revision: 206734
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58125
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (inline_free_summary):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 17 20:55:42 2014
New Revision: 206732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206732&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59706
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Use create_tmp_var
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59864
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01061.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59864
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Started with r206638.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59862
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Can you make a diff of /path_tar/gcc/fortran and /path_svn/gcc/fortran?
The error
Error: Deferred-length character component 'getname' at (1) is not yet
supported
is still active even on trunk (4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59270
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58811
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 17 20:25:01 2014
New Revision: 206731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59270
PR c++/5881
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59270
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 17 20:25:01 2014
New Revision: 206731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59270
PR c++/5881
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58811
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59862
--- Comment #2 from Carlos A. Cruz ---
I get the following error message:
SurrogateTestCase.F90:54.57:
class (SurrogateTestCase), intent(inout) :: this
1
Error: Deferred-length char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59862
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59864
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r206729, r206720 configured as
~/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--enable-checking=yes,rtl --enable-languages=c --disable-multilib
FAIL with
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/libg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59440
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59134
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Not a duplicate of 57904 AFAICT.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59595
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59770
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59806
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59865
Bug ID: 59865
Summary: gnu multiversion calculates wrong target
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #12)
> > This untested patch gets rid of the majority of the failures, although
> > I still see 2-3 errors in the dwarf code in tests like namelist_70.cf90:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #199 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 31878
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31878&action=edit
.mozconfig_profile_gen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59736
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #198 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 31877
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31877&action=edit
My local PGO/LTO script
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59736
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 17 19:05:52 2014
New Revision: 206729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-17 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/59736
* ipa-cp.c (prev_edge_cl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59864
Bug ID: 59864
Summary: [4.9 regression] RTL check: expected code 'reg', have
'ne' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1125
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59794
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jan 17 18:52:14 2014
New Revision: 206728
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206728&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Silence vector ABI change warnings for x86
Backport from mainli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59794
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jan 17 18:51:27 2014
New Revision: 206727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206727&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Consolidate ABI warning into type_natural_mode
gcc/
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59863
Bug ID: 59863
Summary: const array in function is placed on stack
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58125
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
Yufeng Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59462
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Fri Jan 17 18:07:18 2014
New Revision: 206724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206724&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-17 Andrew Pinski
Steve Ellcey
PR target/59462
* co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746
Bug 58746 depends on bug 57904, which changed state.
Bug 57904 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior"
warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5790
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 17 17:50:10 2014
New Revision: 206723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206723&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57904
* passes.def: Reorder pass_copy_prop, pass_unrol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59736
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The problem Richard is nobody is maintaining the code. What makes this any
different than a port which has become unmaintained and thus isn't being fixed
in a timely manner? I'm not in a position to own th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
Bug 58344 depends on bug 58346, which changed state.
Bug 58346 Summary: ICE with SIGFPE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
(affecting trunk, 4.8, 4.7, and 4.6)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59269
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 17 15:40:13 2014
New Revision: 206718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59269
* init.c (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59862
Bug ID: 59862
Summary: Code does not compile with 4.8.1 tarball release but
compiles with 4.8.1 SVN release
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58111
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Between 20130906 (r202327) and 20130913 (r202562), the problem vanished.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59269
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59857
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
My suspicion is that ulv is short-hand for unsigned long volatile -- since
without it this testcase is completely degenerate: val isn't used at all, so
when ulv is not volatile, then entire function reduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59838
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 17 15:23:17 2014
New Revision: 206716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206716&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59838
cp/
* cvt.c (ocp_convert): Don't segfault on non-exi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59853
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It seems that you use the version 4.8.3, I use the one provided by the
> repository of my distribution (4.8.2). Maybe it is the reason of the
> difference in the behavior.
Very likely not, this has always w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59440
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:51:56 2014
New Revision: 206715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206715&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/58346
* gimple-fold.c (fold_array_ctor_reference): Don't fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #44 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:49:18 2014
New Revision: 206714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/46590
* opts.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58776
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:43:37 2014
New Revision: 206712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206712&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/58776
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa-gen-vect-32.c: Add -fno-vect-co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59440
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:42:58 2014
New Revision: 206711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/59440
* tree-nested.c (convert_nonlocal_reference_stmt,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59064
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:41:58 2014
New Revision: 206710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206710&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/59064
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c: Replace two dg-bogu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:40:11 2014
New Revision: 206709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206709&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/46590
* vec.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59861
Bug ID: 59861
Summary: Inconsistent error output format
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59788
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 17 14:19:55 2014
New Revision: 206708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57945
* passes.c (rest_of_decl_compilation): Don't call varpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59860
Bug ID: 59860
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_may_aliases, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:6843
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59858
--- Comment #1 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
Created attachment 31873
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31873&action=edit
slightly reduced
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
--- Comment #54 from Richard Biener ---
For the original testcase on trunk we get at -O1
tree loop invariant motion: 37.20 (16%) usr 0.02 ( 1%) sys 37.20 (16%)
wall 12127 kB ( 1%) ggc
dead store elim1: 17.42 ( 7%) usr 0.04 ( 2%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59853
--- Comment #2 from Sylvain Laperche ---
Thank you for you reply.
It seems that you use the version 4.8.3, I use the one provided by the
repository of my distribution (4.8.2). Maybe it is the reason of the difference
in the behavior.
I'll try th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172
Karsten Burger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karsten_burger at gmx dot de
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah - sorry for this. As it "worked" for the testcases I tested I was
assuming
that the locations for the default argument computation (!) stmts should be
that of the call, not that of the definition. Appe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo