http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59297
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #3)
> Can you post the exact command line to reproduce the failure?
> (We should have CP2K sources somewhere)
The exact command line is rather easy:
cd cp2k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Can you post the exact command line to reproduce the failure?
(We should have CP2K sources somewhere)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany ---
does this happen with clang's tsan?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
> You could decorate __builtin_shuffle with attribute "warn_unused_result". It
> is not the same, but it probably more precise. It would also warn for:
> __built
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12306
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Even a static pic function can be called from non-pic functions
via function pointer. Functions with hidden visibility in static
libraries can be compiled with -fPIC. A typical example is libgcc.a.
Somethi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40069
Andreas Ehliar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59297
Bug ID: 59297
Summary: ICE: openmp atomic with indirect LHS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59179
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296
Bug ID: 59296
Summary: [c++11] ref-qualified member function is ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59267
--- Comment #3 from James ---
Sorry about having a second comment in a row, but I was playing a bit more with
this, and using a string stream as solely an output stream doesn't appear to
update the stream pointer after outputting the value (should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #27 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Tue Nov 26 03:48:06 2013
New Revision: 205378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205378&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport a variety of profile maintanance fixes from trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718
--- Comment #31 from Rick Regan ---
Gay's strtod() bug was reported and fixed:
http://www.exploringbinary.com/gays-strtod-returns-zero-for-inputs-just-above-2-1075/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59294
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
D
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ppluzhnikov at google dot com
Google ref: b/11542609
Using trunk gcc:
g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20131125 (experimental)
/// -- cut ---
class Foo {
friend class Ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59294
Bug ID: 59294
Summary: template friend declaration 'hidden' by member of same
name
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38470
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn at churchofgit dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59293
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59292
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
For __builtin_shuffle, the issue is that we now call save_expr, which always
sets TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS to 1. I don't know if it would make sense to introduce a
maybe_save_expr that is equivalent to save_expr but do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54485
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 25 22:24:58 2013
New Revision: 205367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205367&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/54485
* decl.c (d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54485
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49557
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55886
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59293
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is a bogus warning as the warning is correct as you have a
signed int variable > unsigned int variable. The compiler does not know that
variable is assigned to a constant here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56597
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ---
Issue here is that x64 ABI just requires that stack has 16-byte alignment.
So that means within a function, using instruction requestion higher-alignment,
compiler should either make sure that for those instructio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56451
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33797
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52368
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55902
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to janus from comment #6)
> For the record: The code that I'm proposing to remove in comment 4 has been
> added by Paul in r105913:
For PR24158 (ice-on-invalid-code), which was on 2005-10-26.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 25 20:51:56 2013
New Revision: 205364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58607
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58607, which changed state.
Bug 58607 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with undeclared variable in
constexpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Patch in testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59258
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 31289 [details]
> Untested fix for the dwarf2out.c ICE.
Seem to solve the problem with both -g and no "-g" for one unreduced test file.
Thank
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59293
Bug ID: 59293
Summary: Bogus -Wsign-compare warning when using typeof() on a
constant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59112
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59113
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59292
--- Comment #1 from Przemysław Strzelczak
---
Created attachment 31291
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31291&action=edit
corresponding source file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59292
Bug ID: 59292
Summary: Spurious warning: ‘’ is used uninitialized
in this function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59258
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31289
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31289&action=edit
gcc49-pr59258.patch
Untested fix for the dwarf2out.c ICE. The problem is that -fsanitize=null
will preserve in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Another somewhat related SH example, compiled with -m4 -O2 -ml on rev 205313:
int
foo1 (long long value)
{
const long long constant = 0xc0008000LL;
if (value < constant)
return 1;
else
retu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I expect it will be in GCC 4.9. It's a wrap-up item for
-fisolate-erroneous-paths.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59291
Bug ID: 59291
Summary: [SH] Group T bit related isnsn before combine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59260
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The tests do need fixing for big-endian, though, since the rsb operation should
write r1 in big-endian and r0 in little-endian.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54019
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #2)
> Confirmed.
Assuming my theories in comment #1 are correct, I guess to fix/improve this it
would require similar mechanisms as mentioned in PR 12306
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59277
--- Comment #4 from Aaron Myles Landwehr ---
That is completely fair. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but that also means that
any code that passes doubles as arguments should also get fatal_error() instead
of dropping arguments to the stack as is c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59243
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59243
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Nov 25 16:47:16 2013
New Revision: 205358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/53976
PR target/59243
* config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Nov 25 16:47:16 2013
New Revision: 205358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/53976
PR target/59243
* config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
Bug ID: 59290
Summary: [ARM] regression on negdi-2.c (big-endian)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50900
--- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:15:53PM +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50900
>
> --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> Isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12306
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Maybe something like function multi-versioning could be used for that?
When compiling as PIC, each function would be output twice. Once with the
assumption that it can be called from non-PIC functions and once w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50900
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Isn't this the issue fixed by
2012-06-29 Andreas Schwab
* copying-lib.texi (Library Copying): Don't use @heading inside
@enumerate.
(which I more recently backported to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58810
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 25 16:10:29 2013
New Revision: 205356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58810
* decl.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59258
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6)
> Seems like we're passing bogus location. Can you e-mail me the unreduced
> testcase? I'll look into it.
The unreduced testcase doesn't fail with -gstrict-dwarf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59289
Bug ID: 59289
Summary: [ARM] regression on unsigned-extend-2.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #20 from Ryan Johnson ---
Hi Martin,
(PM reply because I don't have up-to-date information to file a proper
bug report with)
On 25/11/2013 9:57 AM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1047
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|gcc.dg/builtin-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288
Bug ID: 59288
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59287
Bug ID: 59287
Summary: points-to analysis confused by union accesses
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
Bug ID: 59286
Summary: segfault in __sanitizer::StackDepotGet
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Ryan Johnson from comment #18)
> Great! Does this mean shrink-wrapping will be in gcc-4.9, at least for
> x86_64 and ppc64?
Well, a fairly basic (but not altogether unreasonable) shrink-wrapping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #38 from Sergey Matveev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
> Author: jakub
> Date: Fri Nov 22 21:13:08 2013
> New Revision: 205290
It looks like you use dynamic linking by default. The last time I checked, leak
detection
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59249
--- Comment #3 from Bingfeng Mei ---
Richard, I am not sure I understand about how to split edge.
BB4
/ \
/ \
BB5|
|\|
| \ |
| \ |
| BB6
| /
| /
BB7
Compiler (HEAD) complains "only critic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12)
>> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/pr32604.f90 execution, -O2
>> -fbounds-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #18 from Ryan Johnson ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #17)
> The testcase is now shrink-wrapped on ppc64 and x86_64, it is not on
> others such as i?86 because parameter-passing ABI basically prevents
> it. If any of the t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12)
> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/pr32604.f90 execution, -O2
> -fbounds-check
>
I did not find this failure in your latest test results
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59260
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
Author: amacleod
Date: Mon Nov 25 13:23:09 2013
New Revision: 205352
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205352&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/59260
* fold-const.c: Include hash-table.h.
Modif
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51982
Bug 51982 depends on bug 10474, which changed state.
Bug 10474 Summary: shrink wrapping for functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12306
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59283
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is a known issue. Our std::string does not support the C++11 allocator
requirements, and the current implementation probably never will. When we
switch to a non-Copy-On-Write std::string it will includ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #5 from Akim Demaille ---
Happy two-year birthday, bug! Sorry I'm (slightly more that) off-by-one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Bug ID: 59285
Summary: gcc.dg/builtin-unreachable-6.c:17:1: internal compiler
error: in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2862
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59250
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 25 11:17:23 2013
New Revision: 205349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-25 Marek Polacek
testsuite/
* g++.dg/ubsan/pr59250.C: New
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59250
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59284
Bug ID: 59284
Summary: missing diagnostic on incomplete type at the point of
template definition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59258
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 25 10:46:20 2013
New Revision: 205347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-25 Marek Polacek
* ubsan.c (ubsan_create_data): Increase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Nov 25 09:45:40 2013
New Revision: 205345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-25 Janus Weil
PR fortran/59143
* interface.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 25 09:29:18 2013
New Revision: 205344
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59080
* pt.c (uni
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
