http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You could decorate __builtin_shuffle with attribute "warn_unused_result". It is
not the same, but it probably more precise. It would also warn for:
__builtin_shuffle(x,++m), while -Wunused-value would not.
