[Bug libstdc++/57925] discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925 --- Comment #2 from yangzhe1990 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1) > Ok, but since you don't seem to have a Copyright assignment on file, we > can't really use your code and we would have to, eg, adapt from scratch the

[Bug libstdc++/57914] Memory leak in __cxa_thread_atexit when using thread_local

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57914 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/57790] Waste work in can_move_insns_across()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57790 --- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang --- Patch sent to gcc-patches@ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00880.html

[Bug tree-optimization/14741] graphite with loop blocking and interchanging doesn't optimize a matrix multiplication loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741 --- Comment #25 from Sebastian Pop --- I think the linearization of array subscripts problem is linked to passing arguments to a function in Fortran: by inlining the mult function call in the main program, the main loop on C(I,J)=C(I,J)+A(I,K)*B(K

[Bug fortran/56667] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Expected PARAMETER symbol in complex constant"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56666] Suppression flag for " DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57297] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Mikael, sorry for the very late reply ... (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #8) > I'll need the help from an OOP expert. > > Janus, what is the rationale for using so many different type

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Created attachment 30534 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30534&action=edit Draft mainline patch

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- GCC uses the line number of the start of the asm statement, so line 8 is correct.

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- It is not GCC which is reporting this error message but rather gas (binutils) though GCC is reporting to binutils the line info for the start of the inline-asm.

[Bug libstdc++/57914] Memory leak in __cxa_thread_atexit when using thread_local

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57914 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/57925] discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Ok, but since you don't seem to have a Copyright assignment on file, we can't really use your code and we would have to, eg, adapt from scratch the GSL code or something entirely different. Are you willing to

[Bug libstdc++/57899] bind/function with data member: infinite recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think it's the library, but haven't been able to reduce it yet. With only one nested bind expressions the code works, but with a second nested bind it fails.

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- I mean we use __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step ;)

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Note that in 4.8.x and mainline for modern x86 and x86_64 targets we don't use /dev/urandom at all, we use __x86_rdrand. In general, the idea is that more targets should use hardware support for random numbers

[Bug libstdc++/57916] Improve std::sort partitioning by explicitly employing the pivot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57916 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Improve std::sort |Improve std::sort |pari

[Bug libstdc++/57899] bind/function with data member: infinite recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug driver/57951] New: -MG doesn't work with -MD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57951 Bug ID: 57951 Summary: -MG doesn't work with -MD Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assigne

[Bug libstdc++/54352] relaxed data race rules for ~condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54352 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/57950] New: wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 Bug ID: 57950 Summary: wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Ебануться охрененная п-р-о-м-о-ш-к-а

http://gulmohurschool.com/tmp/lang.php

[Bug driver/35532] Native GCC no longer searches $prefix/lib for startfiles when run from $objdir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35532 Earnie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||earnie at users dot sourceforge.ne

[Bug target/57949] New: [powerpc64] Structure parameter alignment issue with vector extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949 Bug ID: 57949 Summary: [powerpc64] Structure parameter alignment issue with vector extensions Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI, wron

[Bug fortran/56937] Unnecessarily temporary with array-vector assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/56937] Unnecessarily temporary with array-vector assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jul 21 13:44:03 2013 New Revision: 201094 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201094&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-07-21 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/56937 * dependency.c (gfc

[Bug libfortran/35862] [F2003] Implement new rounding modes for run time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35862 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/35862] [F2003] Implement new rounding modes for run time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35862 --- Comment #27 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Jul 21 11:54:27 2013 New Revision: 201093 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-07-21 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/35862 * libgfortra

[Bug fortran/57894] min/max required actual argument missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57894 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57894] min/max required actual argument missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57894 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Jul 21 11:46:43 2013 New Revision: 201092 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201092&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-07-21 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/57894 * check.c (mi

[Bug tree-optimization/14741] graphite with loop blocking and interchanging doesn't optimize a matrix multiplication loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741 --- Comment #24 from Sebastian Pop --- Looking at t.f90.003t.original (the first dump file of -fdump-tree-all-all) I see that the array c is already in linear form: (*cD.1876)[((integer(kind=8)D.9) jD.1897 * stride.12D.1892 + offset.13D.1893) + (

[Bug tree-optimization/14741] graphite with loop blocking and interchanging doesn't optimize a matrix multiplication loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741 --- Comment #23 from Sebastian Pop --- If possible, we need to maintain the subscripted version of arrays: C(I,J) A(I,K) B(K,J) Without a representation of multi dimensional arrays, we would need to delinearize the arrays prior to graphite.

[Bug tree-optimization/14741] graphite with loop blocking and interchanging doesn't optimize a matrix multiplication loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741 --- Comment #22 from Sebastian Pop --- Once we revert that patch, the remaining problem is that graphite_can_represent_scev returns false on this scev: {{(stride.12_14 + offset.13_15) + 1, +, stride.12_14}_1, +, 1}_2 the parameters are defined l

[Bug fortran/50536] an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- > it is insufficient as it does not take care of, e.g. >(foo%a(foo%i), foo%i = 1,5) > which is odd but valid. Or the following (for i /= j): (foo(i)%i, foo(j)%i = 1, 5).

[Bug tree-optimization/50913] [4.7 Regression] ICE in scan_tree_for_params_right_scev, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:633 compiling libgfortran with -floop-interchange -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/14741] graphite with loop blocking and interchanging doesn't optimize a matrix multiplication loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741 --- Comment #21 from Sebastian Pop --- Scop detection does not detect this loop because we now require the scev of the data references to be analyzable in all the loops around: commit e97c4b0daa932558eae4d9b9794cdd549e6d40bd Author: rguenth Date